Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

305 LB9 are slow bull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 12:05 PM
  #201  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by freaky
what about with a nice cam an vortec heads ?
big cam, with vortec heads could reach 400 crank HP I would think. LT1's can do it on stock heads with the right cam. There are cammed LT1s making those kinds of numbers easily. Some LT1's have made up to 360rwhp with the right cam, cai, and exhaust on stock heads (valve springs done ofcourse)

But that begs the question, how much are you willing to spend to upgrade it. At what point do you begin spending more money than you would have if you swapped to a 350, or if you swapped to a Gen3 motor.

If your goal is to build the ultimate 305 with the most power possible money no object then absolutely yes it can be done. And it could probably be done with a TBI type intake.
Old 02-14-2012, 12:15 PM
  #202  
Supreme Member

 
freaky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,074
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 88 camaro irocz
Engine: l98 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

how big a cam tho would it take ? would it be street drivable ? i'm going turbo myself in a couple months . to me thats the easiest route , something i know an know will work
Old 02-14-2012, 12:27 PM
  #203  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by freaky
how big a cam tho would it take ? would it be street drivable ? i'm going turbo myself in a couple months . to me thats the easiest route , something i know an know will work...
You can make 400-RWHP with a turbo on your 305 in your sleep. Naturally aspirated though, it is really asking a lot from a small bore engine that is relegated to a small intake valve. The cubic inch displacement was never the problem with these motors, it is how GM obtained the cubic inch displacement that gives it its' naturally aspirated limitation (small bore). Turbo is an entirely different story...
Old 02-14-2012, 01:18 PM
  #204  
Supreme Member

 
freaky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,074
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 88 camaro irocz
Engine: l98 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

i'm buying a turbo next month i'm putting the lt1 cam in her then i'm getting the turbo . i'm thing a t70 with a .84 ar exhaust . any thoughts street lethal ?
i just got the ebl flash i'm getting the bugs out first n learn to tune then it's turbo bound .lol
Old 02-14-2012, 01:57 PM
  #205  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by freaky
i'm buying a turbo next month i'm putting the lt1 cam in her then i'm getting the turbo . i'm thing a t70 with a .84 ar exhaust . any thoughts street lethal ?
i just got the ebl flash i'm getting the bugs out first n learn to tune then it's turbo bound .lol
If you go with that turbo, here is one from another member, $150.00 shipped...

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/sout...ml#post5181642

Your already ahead of the game with the EBL, as rather than waste time burning chips, Bob simplified everything with his own version of GM code and firmware. The cam is a great choice for the street as well as that turbo, but put a little extra work in whichever heads you choose to go with as that is where your real gains will come from...
Old 02-14-2012, 03:05 PM
  #206  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

You can throw the biggest cam made into a 305, but it won't do a damn thing unless the engines airflow demand requires it. 305's don't huff much air N/A so you'd be wasting your time with a huge cam and really high flow heads.
Old 02-14-2012, 06:26 PM
  #207  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Can I reuse my stock rockers,pushrods, and flat top lifters with my 113 heads on my 305 I hate when ppl don't give answers but opinions
Old 02-14-2012, 06:30 PM
  #208  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,370
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Sojer
Can I reuse my stock rockers,pushrods, and flat top lifters with my 113 heads on my 305 I hate when ppl don't give answers but opinions

You cannot reuse flat tappet lifters if you change the cam. If you are using all stock stuff you can reuse the rest
Old 02-14-2012, 07:20 PM
  #209  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
And I will still say you can get 400+ rwhp out of a tbi305
aaaaaaand theeeeeeen

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
+1 and if you don't want vortech heads, machine the hell out of the stock heads and along with the cam get roller rockers, lifters. Maybe a new crank. And probably switch to carb, i hate computers in my cars. I see 400 being possible
I really hate to feed the trolls but Jesus H Christ on a pogo stick....can you keep your story or wacky claims straight please?

Stock LO3 heads aren't supporting 400hp at the wheels N/A...period. But then again if a carb is on it.......
Old 02-14-2012, 09:39 PM
  #210  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Sojer
Can I reuse my stock rockers,pushrods, and flat top lifters with my 113 heads on my 305 I hate when ppl don't give answers but opinions
This isn't the engine tech section for those types of questions, but lifters are a no no for re-using. Only roller lifters can be re-used. As far as rockers and pushrods, yes they can be re-used. I would highly recommend new stiffer valve springs though if you are camming it.
Old 02-14-2012, 09:59 PM
  #211  
Supreme Member

 
kmcn47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lynden WA
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 84 Trans Am, 84 Fiero, 86 944
Engine: 5.0, 2.5, 2.5
Transmission: 5spd
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by freaky
what about with a nice cam an vortec heads ?
Originally Posted by thebuffalo
+1 and if you don't want vortech heads, machine the hell out of the stock heads and along with the cam get roller rockers, lifters. Maybe a new crank. And probably switch to carb, i hate computers in my cars. I see 400 being possible
i'm sorry but even an optimist/305 lover like myself cant pretend to see numbers around 400 from any of that, i mean it just doesn't translate to a substantial enough increase in hp on itself
Old 02-14-2012, 10:18 PM
  #212  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Sojer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Its the cam in it its jst for now to get it back running and I will upgrade to lt4 springs just for a 1 or 2k at most than a full rebuild I need my car back the fuel injectors went out after the race so I haven't dove it sents that day
Old 02-15-2012, 03:47 AM
  #213  
Member
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: manitoba.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 ws6, 2011 sierra 6.2L 6 speed
Engine: ls1
Transmission: M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Sojer
Can I reuse my stock rockers,pushrods, and flat top lifters with my 113 heads on my 305 I hate when ppl don't give answers but opinions
flat top lifters are good for high compresion. i like hydraulic pistons ease of maintenance. it's nice to not have to adjust your pistons every year.
Old 02-15-2012, 08:09 AM
  #214  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
crazy3rdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Long Neck, De
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2002 SS
Engine: Ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

What a frigin air head. lmao
Old 02-15-2012, 08:32 AM
  #215  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Sojer
Its the cam in it its jst for now to get it back running and I will upgrade to lt4 springs just for a 1 or 2k at most than a full rebuild I need my car back the fuel injectors went out after the race so I haven't dove it sents that day
Old 02-15-2012, 10:50 AM
  #216  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by fly89gta
aaaaaaand theeeeeeen



I really hate to feed the trolls but Jesus H Christ on a pogo stick....can you keep your story or wacky claims straight please?

Stock LO3 heads aren't supporting 400hp at the wheels N/A...period. But then again if a carb is on it.......
"machine the hell out of stock heads" means that the heads are no longer stock.
And 400hp at the wheels N/A is possible. I will still stick with this, and thinking that it is not possible is borderline ignorant.

I feel like people find one thing that doesnt add up and try to use it to prove a point but really, you didn't read enough or you're just blowing out hot air.

If a i4 honda motor can get 400hp N/a, Which I HAVE seen it do ON the dyno. Then there is NO way a 305 can't do it.

Originally Posted by kmcn47
i'm sorry but even an optimist/305 lover like myself cant pretend to see numbers around 400 from any of that, i mean it just doesn't translate to a substantial enough increase in hp on itself
What doesn't translate, a stock 305 gets about 170 on a good day. So.. you take those garbage swirl port heads, and machine them until they are wide open. This is about.. 30-40 hp RIGHT THERE. Then you take off that garbage throttle body and remove all those sensors that dont do anything and rip the ecu out from under your dash, thats another 15 man points. Get a new HEI distributor and a decent ignition box. New roller cam, lifters , rockers. Probably sitting at about 300 at this point with alot better RPM range and alot less internal friction. Since you got all that fuel running in now its time for headers, BAM everything just started working 10 times better, so the headers probably give you another 30-40, dont forget to remove the EGR and cat if you live in a emissions free area like me. Get a good muffler for some backpressure. Timing, switch from chain to gear to gear, thats about 20hp. So now carb and intake manifold. Hmm I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank but Idk... its just statistics.

And i'm just a amateur, so if I could come up with this... imagine what a professional could do?

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-15-2012 at 10:58 AM.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:08 AM
  #217  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
LOL, priceless!

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
What doesn't translate, a stock 305 gets about 170 on a good day. So.. you take those garbage swirl port heads, and machine them until they are wide open. This is about.. 30-40 hp RIGHT THERE. Then you take off that garbage throttle body and remove all those sensors that dont do anything and rip the ecu out from under your dash, thats another 15 man points. Get a new HEI distributor and a decent ignition box. New roller cam, lifters , rockers. Probably sitting at about 300 at this point with alot better RPM range and alot less internal friction. Since you got all that fuel running in now its time for headers, BAM everything just started working 10 times better, so the headers probably give you another 30-40, dont forget to remove the EGR and cat if you live in a emissions free area like me. Get a good muffler for some backpressure. Timing, switch from chain to gear to gear, thats about 20hp. So now carb and intake manifold. Hmm I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank but Idk... its just statistics.

And i'm just a amateur, so if I could come up with this... imagine what a professional could do?
You are very much an amatuer, but most of us already knew that. Headers in no way, shape, or form are adding anywhere near 30-40 HP on a 305. A timing gear swap over a chain is also not adding 20 HP....or even 5 HP for that matter. It sounds like you opened up a jegs catalog and got your HP facts right out of the descriptions. I'll say it again....give it a shot on your quest for your 400 HP 305 and let us know how it goes. Until then, stop trying to preach to the guys that know better.

And that N/A 400 HP honda engine probably ran on race gas, had 14:1 compression, ITB's, the works. Making 400HP N/A on a honda engine is next to impossible as well.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:17 AM
  #218  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by whitedevilTA
LOL, priceless!



You are very much an amatuer, but most of us already knew that. Headers in no way, shape, or form are adding anywhere near 30-40 HP on a 305. A timing gear swap over a chain is also not adding 20 HP....or even 5 HP for that matter. It sounds like you opened up a jegs catalog and got your HP facts right out of the descriptions. I'll say it again....give it a shot on your quest for your 400 HP 305 and let us know how it goes. Until then, stop trying to preach to the guys that know better.

And that N/A 400 HP honda engine probably ran on race gas, had 14:1 compression, ITB's, the works. Making 400HP N/A on a honda engine is next to impossible as well.
headers may not add horsepower themselves but they make your engine run better because the AIR ( motor = air pump ) that your pushing through runs out better, which thus gives you less stress on the motor, gaining hp... Jesus, is this a basic engine class here or what? And a gear to gear swap doesn't give horsepower.. your right, it free's up wasted horsepower and transfers it 10 times better. I don't see why people on a 3rdgen forum hate 3rdgen motors so much. I'm not gunna build a 305, and im not on a quest for it. I'm just telling you that 400hp N/a is VERY EASILY obtainable on a 305. any more than that is tough but that is easy. To get horsepower on a motor all you're doing is pushing more air, faster, and more efficiently. I'm an amateur and I know these things...

400hp N/A honda motor had 4 dirtbike carbs, not sure the size. and it had like 13.5:1 so you're close.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:17 AM
  #219  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
"machine the hell out of stock heads" means that the heads are no longer stock.
And 400hp at the wheels N/A is possible. I will still stick with this, and thinking that it is not possible is borderline ignorant.

I feel like people find one thing that doesnt add up and try to use it to prove a point but really, you didn't read enough or you're just blowing out hot air.

If a i4 honda motor can get 400hp N/a, Which I HAVE seen it do ON the dyno. Then there is NO way a 305 can't do it.



What doesn't translate, a stock 305 gets about 170 on a good day. So.. you take those garbage swirl port heads, and machine them until they are wide open. This is about.. 30-40 hp RIGHT THERE. Then you take off that garbage throttle body and remove all those sensors that dont do anything and rip the ecu out from under your dash, thats another 15 man points. Get a new HEI distributor and a decent ignition box. New roller cam, lifters , rockers. Probably sitting at about 300 at this point with alot better RPM range and alot less internal friction. Since you got all that fuel running in now its time for headers, BAM everything just started working 10 times better, so the headers probably give you another 30-40, dont forget to remove the EGR and cat if you live in a emissions free area like me. Get a good muffler for some backpressure. Timing, switch from chain to gear to gear, thats about 20hp. So now carb and intake manifold. Hmm I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank but Idk... its just statistics.

And i'm just a amateur, so if I could come up with this... imagine what a professional could do?
Buffalo, your post is full of fail and mis-information.

Dont' make me animate that 305 saga picture.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:22 AM
  #220  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,370
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
"machine the hell out of stock heads" means that the heads are no longer stock.
And 400hp at the wheels N/A is possible. I will still stick with this, and thinking that it is not possible is borderline ignorant.

I feel like people find one thing that doesnt add up and try to use it to prove a point but really, you didn't read enough or you're just blowing out hot air.

If a i4 honda motor can get 400hp N/a, Which I HAVE seen it do ON the dyno. Then there is NO way a 305 can't do it.
The problem with the 305 is not the size it is the bore. Chances are the Honda heads with 4 valves have a much higher flow potential than any 305 heads every will because of valve size. Also the Honda engine can probably spin 2xRPM then the 305 will ever spin on its best day. I have seen a fair amount of streetable Hondas turning 10k RPMs.

If the 305 had a bore big enough to accept some decent sized valves it could make 400whp no problem.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:22 AM
  #221  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
Buffalo, your post is full of fail and mis-information.

Dont' make me animate that 305 saga picture.
You may say it's full of fail, but thats cause I'm right and 400hp is achievable, what i said may only be around 330-350 but thats close and it wouldnt be hard to get the rest. no mis-information either. all legit.

Fact: if you support a 305, people will get mad and rage and even go against what is known to try to prove a point.

Originally Posted by midias
The problem with the 305 is not the size it is the bore. Chances are the Honda heads with 4 valves have a much higher flow potential than any 305 heads every will because of valve size. Also the Honda engine can probably spin 2xRPM then the 305 will ever spin on its best day. I have seen a fair amount of streetable Hondas turning 10k RPMs.

If the 305 had a bore big enough to accept some decent sized valves it could make 400whp no problem.
See, someone knows a thing or two about how to go fast. I've heard of 305's doing 9,000 rpm's but I know s2000's are capable of 11,000

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-15-2012 at 11:27 AM.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:26 AM
  #222  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Jersey Shore
Posts: 833
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo

What doesn't translate, a stock 305 gets about 170 on a good day. So.. you take those garbage swirl port heads, and machine them until they are wide open. This is about.. 30-40 hp RIGHT THERE. Then you take off that garbage throttle body and remove all those sensors that dont do anything and rip the ecu out from under your dash, thats another 15 man points. Get a new HEI distributor and a decent ignition box. New roller cam, lifters , rockers. Probably sitting at about 300 at this point with alot better RPM range and alot less internal friction. Since you got all that fuel running in now its time for headers, BAM everything just started working 10 times better, so the headers probably give you another 30-40, dont forget to remove the EGR and cat if you live in a emissions free area like me. Get a good muffler for some backpressure. Timing, switch from chain to gear to gear, thats about 20hp. So now carb and intake manifold. Hmm I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank but Idk... its just statistics.

And i'm just a amateur, so if I could come up with this... imagine what a professional could do?

that takes the cake, man i wish that was true my L98 would be pushing 500 if that was the case
Old 02-15-2012, 11:31 AM
  #223  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by insomniac
that takes the cake, man i wish that was true my L98 would be pushing 500 if that was the case
no, it wouldnt. it would be pushing like 350 cause L98's have low stock hp too.


I'm going to look up the article of the 305 N/A that was on a circle track pushing like 500 just to end this debate.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-15-2012 at 11:37 AM.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:37 AM
  #224  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Jersey Shore
Posts: 833
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
no, it wouldnt. it would be pushing like 350 cause L98's have low stock hp too.


I'm going to look up the article of the 305 N/A that was on a circle track pushing like 500 just to end this debate.

i wasnt serious
Old 02-15-2012, 11:57 AM
  #225  
Junior Member

 
1985WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norfolk,NE
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 WS6 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 355 TPI N/A
Transmission: Borg/Warner T-5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Sojer
Its the cam in it its jst for now to get it back running and I will upgrade to lt4 springs just for a 1 or 2k at most than a full rebuild I need my car back the fuel injectors went out after the race so I haven't dove it sents that day
If you are seriously running stock springs on anything other than the stock cam, you are ****ing dumb. Get springs on that damn motor and run 1.6 rocker.
Old 02-15-2012, 12:02 PM
  #226  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by 1985WS6TA
If you are seriously running stock springs on anything other than the stock cam, you are ****ing dumb. Get springs on that damn motor and run 1.6 rocker.
I say all new heads...
Old 02-15-2012, 12:06 PM
  #227  
Junior Member
 
85 Frankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1988 305 TPI
Transmission: 1993 T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

This is the funniest thread I have ever read
Old 02-15-2012, 12:19 PM
  #228  
Junior Member

 
1985WS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norfolk,NE
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 WS6 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 355 TPI N/A
Transmission: Borg/Warner T-5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I say all new heads...
How about anything other than a 305....
I'm all for being different but there's just no point in building a 305 99% of the time.
Old 02-15-2012, 01:58 PM
  #229  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
sailtexas186548's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kemah, Tx
Posts: 2,604
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo

What doesn't translate, a stock 305 gets about 170 on a good day. So.. you take those garbage swirl port heads, and machine them until they are wide open. This is about.. 30-40 hp RIGHT THERE. Then you take off that garbage throttle body and remove all those sensors that dont do anything and rip the ecu out from under your dash, thats another 15 man points. Get a new HEI distributor and a decent ignition box. New roller cam, lifters , rockers. Probably sitting at about 300 at this point with alot better RPM range and alot less internal friction. Since you got all that fuel running in now its time for headers, BAM everything just started working 10 times better, so the headers probably give you another 30-40, dont forget to remove the EGR and cat if you live in a emissions free area like me. Get a good muffler for some backpressure. Timing, switch from chain to gear to gear, thats about 20hp. So now carb and intake manifold. Hmm I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank but Idk... its just statistics.

And i'm just a amateur, so if I could come up with this... imagine what a professional could do?
So you said:

Stock 170hp

+ 30-40hp from ported stock iron heads
+ 15hp for a carb swap (I think thats what you meant, you cant just
"rip the Tb and ECU out" to gain HP )
+ 75hp for a new HEI and MSD box, cam and rockers (already roller cam so no gain there, and you probably going to INCREASE friction with the larger cam BTW, thats negligable though)
+30-40 for headers
+5 hp for no cat which is generous (EGR is disabled at WOT so no gain there)
+20 hp for swapping a timing chain to gear drive (your dreaming here)

so your at 365HP(which is laughable because the numbers your throwing out are WAY high on average), and the last 35hp from an intake (and carb again?) swap.

Then you take into account the divide all catalog advertized HP gains by 2 and you get real world, soooo your sitting at 285 HP, give it a little fudge factor of 15hp and ok your at 300 crank HP.

Your right, you are an amateur... who's reading a jegs catalog and adding up the "+XXXhp" figures. And no, simple addition is NOT statisitcs, it's first grade math.
Old 02-15-2012, 02:31 PM
  #230  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by sailtexas186548
So you said:

Stock 170hp

+ 30-40hp from ported stock iron heads
+ 15hp for a carb swap (I think thats what you meant, you cant just
"rip the Tb and ECU out" to gain HP )
+ 75hp for a new HEI and MSD box, cam and rockers (already roller cam so no gain there, and you probably going to INCREASE friction with the larger cam BTW, thats negligable though)
+30-40 for headers
+5 hp for no cat which is generous (EGR is disabled at WOT so no gain there)
+20 hp for swapping a timing chain to gear drive (your dreaming here)

so your at 365HP(which is laughable because the numbers your throwing out are WAY high on average), and the last 35hp from an intake (and carb again?) swap.

Then you take into account the divide all catalog advertized HP gains by 2 and you get real world, soooo your sitting at 285 HP, give it a little fudge factor of 15hp and ok your at 300 crank HP.

Your right, you are an amateur... who's reading a jegs catalog and adding up the "+XXXhp" figures. And no, simple addition is NOT statisitcs, it's first grade math.
i actually didn't get a jegs catalog(i prefer summit anyways), i was just guestimating.
Old 02-15-2012, 03:32 PM
  #231  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Buffalo, you're saying you can make an N/A 305 produce 400hp wheel? As in somewhere around 500hp crank? as in somewhere in the ballpark of 1.6hp per cubic inch? Do you work for Ferrari building F1 motors? If not, you should.
Oh, one more thing. If you're saying yes to any of the questions I said above, you're lying.
Old 02-15-2012, 03:36 PM
  #232  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
Buffalo, you're saying you can make an N/A 305 produce 400hp wheel? As in somewhere around 500hp crank? as in somewhere in the ballpark of 1.6hp per cubic inch? Do you work for Ferrari building F1 motors? If not, you should.
Oh, one more thing. If you're saying yes to any of the questions I said above, you're lying.
Maybe honda mechanics should too, s2000's have even better hp per cubic inch stock. (240hp / 122 cubic inches)
and 400 out of the crank of a 305 would be 1.311475409836066hp per cubic inch

I'm thinking this is getting close to 400hp right out the crank
read first, talk later.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-15-2012 at 03:45 PM.
Old 02-15-2012, 03:48 PM
  #233  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

You definitely said 400 wheel power. And the H22 makes 230 crank not the 2 liter. And if we're talking wheel, then the s2k puts down about 200hp on a good day, you do the hp per liter math on it.
Do your homework kid.
Edit, the anticipation is killing me. Its 1.56hp per ci.
Old 02-15-2012, 03:50 PM
  #234  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
sailtexas186548's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kemah, Tx
Posts: 2,604
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
And 400hp at the wheels N/A is possible. I will still stick with this, and thinking that it is not possible is borderline ignorant.
read first talk later?
Old 02-15-2012, 03:53 PM
  #235  
Member
 
thebuffalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seminole, FL
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 trans am
Engine: 350sb
Transmission: t400
Axle/Gears: 7.5/2.73
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by sailtexas186548
read first talk later?
I said 400 to the wheels is possible, not that I can do it. I said I can do 400 out of the crank.

read first, then talk.


Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
You definitely said 400 wheel power. And the H22 makes 230 crank not the 2 liter. And if we're talking wheel, then the s2k puts down about 200hp on a good day, you do the hp per liter math on it.
Do your homework kid.
Edit, the anticipation is killing me. Its 1.56hp per ci.
still producing 1.5+ hp per cubic inch, so maybe they should be ferrari mechanics?

I feel like you guys are off topic not providing any legit statements as to a 305 being slow and simply just trashing to bash me, as to when I'm saying you can get 400hp+ out of the crank.

Last edited by thebuffalo; 02-15-2012 at 03:57 PM.
Old 02-15-2012, 04:17 PM
  #236  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,370
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
Maybe honda mechanics should too, s2000's have even better hp per cubic inch stock. (240hp / 122 cubic inches)
and 400 out of the crank of a 305 would be 1.311475409836066hp per cubic inch


read first, talk later.
Honda does not need to work for ferrari. They already build awesome race engine that get well over 3whp per cube between F1 and moto GP. They also have factory engines that get over 2.5whp per cube.

Example the CBR1000 makes about 165whp on a dyno and is only 61 cubes.
Old 02-15-2012, 04:27 PM
  #237  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by thebuffalo
I said 400 to the wheels is possible, not that I can do it. I said I can do 400 out of the crank.

read first, then talk.




still producing 1.5+ hp per cubic inch, so maybe they should be ferrari mechanics?

I feel like you guys are off topic not providing any legit statements as to a 305 being slow and simply just trashing to bash me, as to when I'm saying you can get 400hp+ out of the crank.
We're not providing legit statements? Please post up an N/A L03 motor, producing 330hp wheel. I lowered the standard for ya to make it easier.
Old 02-15-2012, 04:45 PM
  #238  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
sailtexas186548's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kemah, Tx
Posts: 2,604
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

buff - you EXPLICTLY claimed that 400RWHP is possible, then threw some numbers out of a catalog and are expecting to not get called out? takes you lumps, move on, and stop spreading false info/claims
Old 02-15-2012, 06:11 PM
  #239  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (30)
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

This is good for many laughs.

+1

Carry on.
Old 02-15-2012, 06:12 PM
  #240  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by BlueZee28
This is good for many laughs.

+1

Carry on.
Old 02-15-2012, 06:26 PM
  #241  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (30)
 
BlueZee28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

I think I'm going to buy an Iron Duke Camaro and mod it to get 300rwhp.
Old 02-15-2012, 06:32 PM
  #242  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

And on that note, I'm gonna go stare at my motor on its stand, and wave my magic wand and hope for 2hp per cubic inch. Later!
Old 02-15-2012, 06:49 PM
  #243  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
sailtexas186548's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kemah, Tx
Posts: 2,604
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by BlueZee28
I think I'm going to buy an Iron Duke Camaro and mod it to get 300rwhp.
just get a new HEI for your 6.0 you'll gain 57rwhp!
Old 02-15-2012, 08:49 PM
  #244  
Junior Member
 
83TransAmDayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 trans am Dayton
Engine: 305 cross fire
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Heres some facts

http://www.hioutput.com/tech/343hp/343hp.html

http://www.hioutput.com/tech/400hp/400hp.html

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...s/viewall.html





Old 02-15-2012, 09:08 PM
  #245  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by BlueZee28
I think I'm going to buy an Iron Duke Camaro and mod it to get 300rwhp.
300rwhp might be out of line, but you could get about 330 crank HP with the SuperDuty 4 parts and a 3.3L stroker kit. GM built one from off the shelf Superduty parts. Peak power was at about 7800rpm though. Enough to make some of the honda boys begin to drool. This was in 1982.
Old 02-15-2012, 09:09 PM
  #246  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

The popular hotrodding article doesn't load.

I'm willing to bet that ALL of those engines were dynoed without spinning their own water pump, alternator, nor did they have a full exhaust back to the tail pipes when dynoed.

Thats the same as the old SAE Gross numbers as compared to the SAE Net numbers.
Old 02-15-2012, 09:17 PM
  #247  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

The popular hotrodding article is accurate.
edit: nevermind, i opened the wrong article the first time.

Last edited by calamitascamaro; 02-15-2012 at 09:21 PM.
Old 02-15-2012, 09:22 PM
  #248  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
The popular hotrodding article doesn't load.

I'm willing to bet that ALL of those engines were dynoed without spinning their own water pump, alternator, nor did they have a full exhaust back to the tail pipes when dynoed.

Thats the same as the old SAE Gross numbers as compared to the SAE Net numbers.
They show the 3oh5 with nothing attached in the article, so you are absolutely correct.
Old 02-15-2012, 09:22 PM
  #249  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,844
Received 212 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by calamitascamaro
The popular hotrodding article is accurate.
Yeah, take a look at those pics. The engine isn't spinning its own alternator or water pump, and its essentially dumping at the headers.

Put the accessories back on and come talk about the 400hp 305.

Do you see it spinning its own accessories in the pic below? Nope. Come back with one that is.

Old 02-15-2012, 09:24 PM
  #250  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
calamitascamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: 305 LB9 are slow bull

Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
Yeah, take a look at those pics. The engine isn't spinning its own alternator or water pump, and its essentially dumping at the headers.

Put the accessories back on and come talk about the 400hp 305.

Do you see it spinning its own accessories in the pic below? Nope. Come back with one that is.

Im on your side lol. Read post above yours.


Quick Reply: 305 LB9 are slow bull



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 AM.