NEED HELP!! Car is running awful.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
NEED HELP!! Car is running awful.
Just did a LT4 hotcam swap with 1.6's and a set of S/R Torquer heads. The car is running awful. No power at all. At the track today my best was a 16.4 when last year I went 14.3 on the stock cam and heads. What could be wrong?? She's also running pig rich, I burned three times as much gas going out as I did last year. I have a few ideas on what the problem could be, what do you guys think??
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Easton, MA
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700 r4
could be a lot of things. First I'd check the codes. Tell us if you get any. If your car is a speed density car, it shouldn't be its an 88, but if it is there is no way that swap you made will run good at all without some chip tuning.
Interesting problem I had that might help you. I swapped my rockers with roller rockers on my vette heads, and they didn't fit right, even though i got the valve covers on. The rockers would not let the valves seat against the heads on 5 of my cylinders so i had major compression loss, resulting im a loss of power, and wicked ****ty running.
All that because i trusted my dad to buy roller rockers, i even specifically told him they needed to be for centerbolt valve covers, o well, he's taught me everything i know so i forgive him.
Interesting problem I had that might help you. I swapped my rockers with roller rockers on my vette heads, and they didn't fit right, even though i got the valve covers on. The rockers would not let the valves seat against the heads on 5 of my cylinders so i had major compression loss, resulting im a loss of power, and wicked ****ty running.
All that because i trusted my dad to buy roller rockers, i even specifically told him they needed to be for centerbolt valve covers, o well, he's taught me everything i know so i forgive him.
First, recheck your ignition timing.
Second, ensure that the computer is at least trying to correct the fuel consumption. If you do not have a scanner, take out your handy-dandy digital voltmeter and go the ECM connector at terminal E14 with the positive probe. Then, Go to a good ground with the negative terminal. Fire up the engine and watch to see if the voltage is bouncing around from .1V (lean) to about .900 (rich). Or if it's staying above .450 for the majority of the time (indicating a rich condition). If it is stuck at any particular voltage, your O2 sensor is bad.
Though, without a scanner, you won't be able to tell if you're getting into closed loop operation.
Also, I've heard that even for MAF cars, there's a limit to how much you can alter the engine from stock and get away with it. Going from a stock 202°/206° cam to an LT4 218°/228° cam is a pretty big jump. The timing curve is going to be very different between the two. You may need to have a chip burned.
Second, ensure that the computer is at least trying to correct the fuel consumption. If you do not have a scanner, take out your handy-dandy digital voltmeter and go the ECM connector at terminal E14 with the positive probe. Then, Go to a good ground with the negative terminal. Fire up the engine and watch to see if the voltage is bouncing around from .1V (lean) to about .900 (rich). Or if it's staying above .450 for the majority of the time (indicating a rich condition). If it is stuck at any particular voltage, your O2 sensor is bad.
Though, without a scanner, you won't be able to tell if you're getting into closed loop operation.
Also, I've heard that even for MAF cars, there's a limit to how much you can alter the engine from stock and get away with it. Going from a stock 202°/206° cam to an LT4 218°/228° cam is a pretty big jump. The timing curve is going to be very different between the two. You may need to have a chip burned.
ACtually, the exact opposite is true. Since the MAF cars measure the airflow directly, they're able to compensate a little better. The MAP cars simply measure manifold pressure and make an "educated" pre-programmed guess as to how much air is being inhaled by the engine. This is why significant modifications can wreak havoc on engine operation (espcially when playing around with camshaft profiles). It's been my experience that increases in duration that top 7° or 8° more than stock on the intake side start pushing the calibration to the limits for MAP cars.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: NE florida
Car: 1992 Z28 and 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: both L98s one with SD and one with MAF
Transmission: both 700R4s
ok its just the way this thread was going thats what it sounded like. thanx for clearing it up.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
the spark cal wouldnt be the huge killer here it would be the idle that went from 30-35kpa to basically 60kpa with the hotcam(im running the same thing in a SD setup)... Your car is prolly getting so much fuel it doenst need below 3k now that your gonna end up washing the cyl walls down unless u address the tuning issue asap....
"If" everything is assembled correctly and mechanically/electrically good, your only way out is pay someone to tune it or learn prom burning yourself........
Its not that bad i do it now, wish i started sooner and side note, just learn how to do it unless u want to pay for a waste of $$$$ from fill in the blank....or work with them by sending your chip back twice a week and have no car for 3 days at a time
LAter
Jeremy
"If" everything is assembled correctly and mechanically/electrically good, your only way out is pay someone to tune it or learn prom burning yourself........
Its not that bad i do it now, wish i started sooner and side note, just learn how to do it unless u want to pay for a waste of $$$$ from fill in the blank....or work with them by sending your chip back twice a week and have no car for 3 days at a time
LAter
Jeremy
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
So basically the only way out is to bet a proper tune done. I will check a few things mechanically and electrically first and then I will get a custom burn done. Thanks for all the help guys.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
10
Aug 11, 2015 10:11 PM
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM





