Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2019, 11:03 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ez.rider69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

I've been doing a ton of research about converting the t5 in an 83 TA from mechanical to hydraulic linkage. I know I need the pedal assembly and obviously master/slave cylinders. I can't find anyone who mentions the bellhousing they use when they do the swap. Does anyone know if factory hydraulic linkage will bolt right onto an 83 bell? Or do i need to the bellhousing from an 84+ t5.
Old 04-16-2019, 06:19 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
MikeP_82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 40
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1982 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: Saginaw 4-spd
Re: T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

You sure it's a T5 not a T10? Ive never heard of a z-bar T5. Consider a hydraulic throw-out bearing instead of a slave?
Old 04-16-2019, 06:22 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
ez.rider69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

Definitely a T5. I haven't considered a hydraulic throw-out, is that how these cars came from the factory?
Old 04-16-2019, 06:33 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,029
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,261 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

The 83 T-5 had Z-bar linkage. It SUCKED I changed mine to hyd in about 86; the instant I first came across a totalled 84 in the buzzard nest. (The interior part of collecting the swap was ... macabre)

The BH is different. The hyd one has a boss on the side to bolt the slave cylinder to

The pedals are also different. Different enough that I don't think they can realistically be adapted.

Just get all that stuff out of any 84-92 V8 Camaro or Firebird. Your trans, clutch, starter, etc. will all bolt right up.

Can't offer any wisdom re. hydraulic slave cylinders.
Old 04-17-2019, 01:16 AM
  #5  
jmd
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 6,287
Received 40 Likes on 39 Posts
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing

You need the 84-92 V8 third gen bellhousing to go 84-92 master / slave.
The earlier pedals (82-87? had the same neutral safety switch as your 83 up high. Later had one off to the left.
Pedal support rods (bolt to the pedal swing bolt up top, and to the two master cylinder studs) are not something to skip, In case you run into already-removed parts without them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
burnoutking82
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
07-11-2012 11:04 AM
z28rsss
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
03-15-2011 04:25 PM
will899
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
11-01-2003 01:47 AM
bhaas
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
08-20-2001 02:57 PM



Quick Reply: T5 mechanical vs hydraulic clutch bellhousing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.