V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

2.8 vs 3.1 computer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2005 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
dodger65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Kouts,IN
Car: 88 Firebird, 86 T/A
Engine: 3.1/305 short block
Transmission: 700r4 w/ transgo, vette servo/700r4
2.8 vs 3.1 computer?

i'm getting ready to put a 3.1 in my 88 firebird, and i have the option of swapping the entire system over to a 91, non-maf setup. is there any performance gain w/ the 3.1 setup vs the 2.8 maf setup, or will i be time & money ahead just dropping it in w/ the existing computer?

thanks, jeff
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 01:38 AM
  #2  
Coult_91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
i think it would best to change it, but it might work! not to sure!
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #3  
dodger65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Kouts,IN
Car: 88 Firebird, 86 T/A
Engine: 3.1/305 short block
Transmission: 700r4 w/ transgo, vette servo/700r4
i figure it will run fine if i don't swap it, but i'm wondering if the 3.1 computer has better advance curve, fuel mapping, etc...
Reply
Old May 11, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
dodger65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Kouts,IN
Car: 88 Firebird, 86 T/A
Engine: 3.1/305 short block
Transmission: 700r4 w/ transgo, vette servo/700r4
bump
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 02:13 PM
  #5  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Tuning software is more widely available for the 2.8s but there are a couple of programs out for the 3.1's computer. Personally I like the speed density setup better than the MAF setup but, that's just me.
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
dodger65's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Kouts,IN
Car: 88 Firebird, 86 T/A
Engine: 3.1/305 short block
Transmission: 700r4 w/ transgo, vette servo/700r4
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
Tuning software is more widely available for the 2.8s but there are a couple of programs out for the 3.1's computer. Personally I like the speed density setup better than the MAF setup but, that's just me.
i do too, but i don't have the air pump plumbing existing on my car, nor do i feel like adding it (or leaving it off and ignoring the ses light). i was just wondering if there were any performance improvements to be had by changing to speed density.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
redraif's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
well considering there are alot of people that say the MAF is another thing holding my car back, I would say you would be better off to change it if you want to do any significant performance additions! The maf will limit the air intake no matter what you do to the rest of the engine. Some say the prog is limited as well as the size of the opening! I'm trying to decide what will be the best course of action with mine to either run a larger MAF or switch to speed density!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mcfastestZ28
Tech / General Engine
1
Oct 1, 2015 11:23 AM
rs_z28_vert
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
6
Sep 30, 2015 09:47 PM
usafirebird
Engine Swap
3
Sep 29, 2015 11:58 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.