18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Car sticks a bit better now and looks a little bit better too.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Total clearance in the front besides at full lock it rubs the inner fender well plastic which I expected. The rear I have KYB Excel Gs and they are just too soft so on the highway when you have a drop off I get a little rub as the car compresses. Going to put a stiffer shock in the rear hoping I don't have to roll the rear fender lips. Just got back in from a night drive, the car really sticks well though.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Thanks for the tip and I might do that on top of some other stuff to as opposed to rolling the rear fender lip. I have KYB GR2s all the way around. They are too soft in the rear regardless for my taste so ordered some Gas-a-Just for the rears a few minutes ago. Seems to be the ideal combo if you are doing KYBs. I have Moog 5664 in front and 5665 in the rear. Going to remove the subwoofer and some other items from my trunk also as the 5665 is a linear spring rate. Going to get the rear right. Thanks again.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
So I just got back from a drive...after removing the 12 inch sub in the trunk and amp along with the spare tire and jack. Went over some bumps and no rub but waiting to get out on some of the highway ramps that have some of the dip drops that are more severe before saying it worked. Either way rear shocks are ordered and it will be a stiffer shock then the GR2. I knew I should have went with Konis as many advised. haha
#12
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
That's a nice looking car.
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
That's a sharp looking car!!!!!!!!!
Question about the clearance on the back. Could you have moved them in a little? Maybe used a 1.75" or 1.5" spacer instead of 2"?? I'm considering a similar set up and wouldn't mind tuckin' them in there just a smidge more.
Question about the clearance on the back. Could you have moved them in a little? Maybe used a 1.75" or 1.5" spacer instead of 2"?? I'm considering a similar set up and wouldn't mind tuckin' them in there just a smidge more.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
I believe I could have went with a 1.75 spacer in the back but doubt I could have went 1.5 without doing something to the inner fender wells.
#16
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
makes me wonder what the stock size was.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
The rears can move in a half inch and still clear. Just a little hammering of the front lower part as usual. I ran 18x10.5 with 17mm offset rear for some time on my 92.
#19
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
How fat a tire looks has a lot to do with where it tucks under the car. My 275 rear tire looks kind of skinny but it would look pretty fat if it was placed a little further inboard. And the cost of a 275/40-17 is way less than the 18s ( like half). I consume a set of rear tires in about 4 months driving on the street so the recurring cost adds up over time. In my case if I wanted a fatter look I would get a wheel with a different backspacing and stay with the more affordable 17-inch tire.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
How fat a tire looks has a lot to do with where it tucks under the car. My 275 rear tire looks kind of skinny but it would look pretty fat if it was placed a little further inboard. And the cost of a 275/40-17 is way less than the 18s ( like half). I consume a set of rear tires in about 4 months driving on the street so the recurring cost adds up over time. In my case if I wanted a fatter look I would get a wheel with a different backspacing and stay with the more affordable 17-inch tire.
At what size / back spacing do they hit? This is one of the reasons I myself am looking at the 18's. This square setup looks like a great combination.
#21
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
LOTS of different variable...LOTS....but rule of thumb is max 5" backspacing up front and max 5.85" backspacing out back. ....but again....research and measure. No two cars are exactly the same, plus mods and aftermarket suspension and brakes, etc. etc.
Lots of good info here:
http://www.skulte.com/adapterfaq.html
Lots of good info here:
http://www.skulte.com/adapterfaq.html
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
LOTS of different variable...LOTS....but rule of thumb is max 5" backspacing up front and max 5.85" backspacing out back. ....but again....research and measure. No two cars are exactly the same, plus mods and aftermarket suspension and brakes, etc. etc.
Lots of good info here:
http://www.skulte.com/adapterfaq.html
Lots of good info here:
http://www.skulte.com/adapterfaq.html
Using a 18" wheel in front would remove the issue of hitting the tie rod end compared to the 17" wheels. One less obstacle to overcome. On the 18, the tie rod would be inside the wheel.
Is a 10.5 wide wheel in front beneficial for a daily/occasional driver? I can understand for autocross, but for everyday driving?
Dont get me wrong, I love the look, just trying to understand better.
Wider wheels would seem to put more stress on steering parts over time, but I could be wrong.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
You can run a 17" x 9.5" wheel with 5.25" BS and not hit the tie rods - I make them, so they work. There are other wheels in 17" that fit - but not all of them are 9.5" wide.
Yes, a square setup is best for all around performance - going staggered on a front heavy car will give the car mechanical understeer and hurt braking too.
Yes, a square setup is best for all around performance - going staggered on a front heavy car will give the car mechanical understeer and hurt braking too.
#24
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Penny for your thoughts.
I'm doing some research here and seen this post. I'm thinking about refreshing the look on a bone stock 91 RS that has 15" wheels/tires. I love the square look and used to have a 90 RS but never had the chance to get wheels.
From what I understand 18x9.5 might fit nice without much interference. My intention is to put 275/35/18s at all 4 corners. I have no idea yet on backspacing but do you think this is a viable solution?
I'm doing some research here and seen this post. I'm thinking about refreshing the look on a bone stock 91 RS that has 15" wheels/tires. I love the square look and used to have a 90 RS but never had the chance to get wheels.
From what I understand 18x9.5 might fit nice without much interference. My intention is to put 275/35/18s at all 4 corners. I have no idea yet on backspacing but do you think this is a viable solution?
#26
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix Arizona - Formerly OCNY
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Silver 1985 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Penny for your thoughts.
I'm doing some research here and seen this post. I'm thinking about refreshing the look on a bone stock 91 RS that has 15" wheels/tires. I love the square look and used to have a 90 RS but never had the chance to get wheels.
From what I understand 18x9.5 might fit nice without much interference. My intention is to put 275/35/18s at all 4 corners. I have no idea yet on backspacing but do you think this is a viable solution?
I'm doing some research here and seen this post. I'm thinking about refreshing the look on a bone stock 91 RS that has 15" wheels/tires. I love the square look and used to have a 90 RS but never had the chance to get wheels.
From what I understand 18x9.5 might fit nice without much interference. My intention is to put 275/35/18s at all 4 corners. I have no idea yet on backspacing but do you think this is a viable solution?
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 18x10.5 Square Set up with 285/35/18s
Stock brakes and axle, I would run 5.5" Bs with an 18x9?5, front and back