anyone got the 4" muffex exhuast system?

Subscribe
Nov 16, 2000 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
you like it? was it a good fit? hows it sound?

------------------
1992 camaro RS
373 10 bolt rearend
ssm sfc's
87 350 TPI
bored 30 over
compucam 2032 with 1.6
482-495 LIFT 214-220 duration full roller rockers
msd6AL
1 5/8 headman headers
2 `1/2 flowmaster exuast
k&n filters gutter air box gutted maf
3 pc under drive pulleys
no emissions no egr etc
custom ED Wright chip
eddelbroc intake base and runners ported plenum
midly ported and polished stock heads
Taylor 8mm wires
B&M mega shifter
gutted maf/airbox
hotchkis lower control arms
3" exhuast cutout
homemade cold air intake
2000 tci stall
700R4 with B&M shift kit
new best ET 13.5 @104.66
Reply 0
Nov 16, 2000 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
I have it with my hooker long tube headers. I love the sound of it. its very loud and raspy sounding. Your not going to be sneaking up on anyone with it though.

It fit pretty good too. ground clearance is good and it fit well in the back and over the axle as well.

Where are you located in Indiana?
Reply 0
Nov 16, 2000 | 09:49 PM
  #3  
I also have the long tube headers (Hooker Super Comps) and I love the sound from the Mufflex 4" system. The fit was good but I had to have some slight modifications made to the Y after the Spohn 350 torque arm was installed (really minor modification).
Reply 0
Nov 17, 2000 | 07:16 AM
  #4  
I have a few sound clips on my web page if your interested:
http://www.geocities.com/gtaluv/Index.html
Reply 0
Nov 17, 2000 | 07:39 AM
  #5  
I had the 4" on a 305 and it sounded pretty good with edelbrock headers. Now that I have swapped a 406 into the car with SLP headers, I have not started it yet but I think it will sound mean.

Are the Hooker long tubes any better than the SLP 1 3/4"? Is it a noticeable difference?

Thanks

Steve
Reply 0
Subscribe