What about these to go along with the Japanese hood?
What about these to go along with the Japanese hood?
Look at these canards that are on the Grace Co camaro. If they ever come on the market I think I might have to get a set. In the two pics after you'll see a carbon fiber rear diffuser and an FRP contoured wing. I think these things are cool and I hope they plan on mass producing and selling them. Just thought I would post some pics to see if you guys liked them too.k bye.
™
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
I don't know why everyone thinks this hood is the cat's a$$.
Personally I think it's ugly.
Personally I think it's ugly.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: Moreno Valley, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: 700R4 (MD8)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open (GU2)
Originally posted by urbanhunter44
I don't know why everyone thinks this hood is the cat's a$$.
Personally I think it's ugly.
I don't know why everyone thinks this hood is the cat's a$$.
Personally I think it's ugly.
I think it is like a cat's a$$. If I have to look at it, then whatever. But I don't choose to look at it, because I don't like it.
Trending Topics
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Car: 88' Iroc-Z
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by DanTheMan_smlk
All of it serves a function for what the car is used for. For a daily driver i would agree. The only thing non functional i see is the stock ground effects
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Goldsboro, NC
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI L98
Originally posted by 87CIZ
Grow Up
All of it serves a function for what the car is used for. For a daily driver i would agree. The only thing non functional i see is the stock ground effects
Grow Up
All of it serves a function for what the car is used for. For a daily driver i would agree. The only thing non functional i see is the stock ground effects
That car looks great! Its funny to see the peoples cars that complain they dont like it. Well most people dont like your car either.
Nice to something finally different! Some people live in the 80's.
Nice to something finally different! Some people live in the 80's. Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: Moreno Valley, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: 700R4 (MD8)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Open (GU2)
Originally posted by 92Three50Z28
That car looks great! Its funny to see the peoples cars that complain they dont like it. Well most people dont like your car either.
Nice to something finally different! Some people live in the 80's.
That car looks great! Its funny to see the peoples cars that complain they dont like it. Well most people dont like your car either.
Nice to something finally different! Some people live in the 80's. Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Car: 88' Iroc-Z
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
i agree on keeping it stock height, but i think it's awesome they actually gave it a lip to make it functional instead of just for looks like the 91-92 Z's The height does throw it off maybe bigger pictures and a straight shot on the rear would give it a different profile. It could be somewhat of an illusion
I like it (some of it), but supprised because I've never seen those pics before. I thought I had seen all the Camaros from Japan, that one is very nice. Kinda weird since some of that stuff is very very similar to some of the stuff I'm having made for my car, mainly the rear diffuser. The front diffusers are not similar to the ones I'm having made, but the idea is similar. Kinda cool to see a pic of a completed set before I start fitting mine. I'm not a fan of the wing, but then again, I'm also not a fan of the stock 91-92 wing either. I like the lower style wings like the stock IROC one or the Hawks 5 incher (whale tail style).
As for the car itself, I wouldnt be name calling because I've never seen it in action. For all you know it could be pushing 1000hp. It looks well built from those pics, nice rollcage, definately aftermarket suspension oriented towards roadracing, and a nice set of wheels. Definately alot nicer than DanTheMan_smlk's car!!!
As for the car itself, I wouldnt be name calling because I've never seen it in action. For all you know it could be pushing 1000hp. It looks well built from those pics, nice rollcage, definately aftermarket suspension oriented towards roadracing, and a nice set of wheels. Definately alot nicer than DanTheMan_smlk's car!!!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 6
From: san jose, ca
Car: 1990 IROC-Z (De-Badged-Carbon Hood)
Engine: Superram 383
Transmission: T-56 w/upgraded Viper Internals
Axle/Gears: 3.73 18x8 and 18x11 irocs
Wow...I like the canards, and the spoiler. And yes, looks like the hatch has some sort of plastic window.
These Japanese guys have some great ideas....especially that beautiful hood.
These Japanese guys have some great ideas....especially that beautiful hood.
Its still in the very early stages. I dont want to give away too much info on it, kind of my secret project. The general idea is to take the stock GFX and modify it a bit. I dont want to do something like take a different bumper and try to make it fit because I think it changes the look of the car too much. I really like how Camaros look so I want to stick to the same style, just have it more aggressive like a C5R compared to a C5. These parts I'm having made will be carbon fiber, but alot of it will be painted to match the body color. I'll be honest about it, this is mostly for appearance, I dont expect this stuff to make any sort of difference when going WOT for my applcation, though the posibility is there. I'm going to be taking alot of pics and giving specs on the build after all my exterior mods are done. So along with the modified front bumper, sideskirts, and rear bumper it'll also have the fenders, the doors, the gascap, the wing, and the hood all done. My goal is to make the car instantly recognisable as a 3rd gen Camaro, but then have the person second guess themselves because it looks so different from what they are used to seeing. And then of course there will be the nay sayers screaming steamed **** because its different, I'll just have to do a burnout for them
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Interesting. Most of it looks somewhat functional, but interesting peices. With dive planes out front, I am really suprised to not see see a front splitter assmebly.
I would be very interested to see the underside of the car, a rear diffuser is not really of any function, without a full belly pan, and a way to create a ventury beween the ground and the cars underside. The diffuser acts as a way to help accelerate and smooth the airflow into the over the car airsteam. Without seeing more information on the design of the rest of the stuff, I don't know that those mods are very functional.
I really like the rear wing, it looks as though it fairly functionable (actualy airfoil shape, located in the air stream, etc.). Its function might explain the front dive planes, as a way to try to balance the car at speed.
Crazy -- You should hit me up on PM's or e-mail. We can compare notes on our projects, as I am currently working on aero stuff that is completely functional. (although I'm still in the design, and planning stages.)
I would be very interested to see the underside of the car, a rear diffuser is not really of any function, without a full belly pan, and a way to create a ventury beween the ground and the cars underside. The diffuser acts as a way to help accelerate and smooth the airflow into the over the car airsteam. Without seeing more information on the design of the rest of the stuff, I don't know that those mods are very functional.
I really like the rear wing, it looks as though it fairly functionable (actualy airfoil shape, located in the air stream, etc.). Its function might explain the front dive planes, as a way to try to balance the car at speed.
Crazy -- You should hit me up on PM's or e-mail. We can compare notes on our projects, as I am currently working on aero stuff that is completely functional. (although I'm still in the design, and planning stages.)
Originally posted by MikeDirntRulez
I hope that wasnt directed towards me.
I hope that wasnt directed towards me.
i think the black stuff on the front is ugly...and the spoiler too. I say what i want when you ask for an opinion
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca.
Car: Base Firebird
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
I personally think that the car is done tastefully. The canards are a bit much for me, but the slight variance on the spoiler and the rear diffuser are subtle, yet look to achieve the owners goal of a more planted rear end at higher speeds. Some people don't like the look of that carbon fiber hood, but think about its functional purpose.. save weight and aid in engine cooling by allowing underhood air to escape. This isn't any ordinary street car, and I think the car pulls off everything fine.
One last thing.. take a look at what's done to that car. If you can't see that this car is a prime example of form follows function, then I don't know what to say.. I guess the weapon R bullsh!t some n00b tacks onto his cavalier is no different than the spoliers/canards/diffusers/whatever on any car in lemans, formula one, top fuel, etc. etc...
One last thing.. take a look at what's done to that car. If you can't see that this car is a prime example of form follows function, then I don't know what to say.. I guess the weapon R bullsh!t some n00b tacks onto his cavalier is no different than the spoliers/canards/diffusers/whatever on any car in lemans, formula one, top fuel, etc. etc...
Supreme Member

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 2
From: Western Maryland
Car: 82z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
happen to have a link to the original pics? Id like to see the rear diffuser in more detail.
edit: found it.
http://www.grace-co.co.jp/3d_rcing_w...cing_wing.html
edit: found it.
http://www.grace-co.co.jp/3d_rcing_w...cing_wing.html
Last edited by blyth18md; Sep 7, 2005 at 05:10 PM.
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
Dan didnt you have a calica with a carbon fiber hood and your calling this camaro R*ce.
Dan didnt you have a calica with a carbon fiber hood and your calling this camaro R*ce.

my car didnt have graphics, a spoiler, or ground effects stuff.... The hood was about to be painted but then i got in to camaros and sold the celica. Hows your mazda?
Last edited by DanTheMan_smlk; Sep 7, 2005 at 05:56 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
just have it more aggressive like a C5R compared to a C5.
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
You know what I meant. Mazda think I might sell it for a rex ill admit I like imports but nothing like american muscle.
You know what I meant. Mazda think I might sell it for a rex ill admit I like imports but nothing like american muscle.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Car: 88' Iroc-Z
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Or how about a twin turbo LS1!
Those come with like 300HP stock! Without the turbo's! And all aluminum! wow.....
Those come with like 300HP stock! Without the turbo's! And all aluminum! wow..... Last edited by 87CIZ; Sep 7, 2005 at 10:50 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Boscobel, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4 w/ about 7500 miles on rebuild
Originally posted by DanTheMan_smlk
what really needs to be done is to put a twin turbo second gen RX-7 rotary engine in a third gen . So fast yet light weight...those engines make 300hp stock. CAMAROS RULE!
what really needs to be done is to put a twin turbo second gen RX-7 rotary engine in a third gen . So fast yet light weight...those engines make 300hp stock. CAMAROS RULE!
Dan with the plan--------
Why dont you be the first to go out and do that. Oh and by the by -I didn't say anything against your interior of your car. Where did that come from.
Why dont you be the first to go out and do that. Oh and by the by -I didn't say anything against your interior of your car. Where did that come from.
Last edited by 92Three50Z28; Sep 7, 2005 at 11:11 PM.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
Originally posted by DanTheMan_smlk
second gen RX-7 rotary engine......those engines make 300hp stock. [/B]
second gen RX-7 rotary engine......those engines make 300hp stock. [/B]
Production:
Engines: 1.3 rotary 160 bhp @ 7000 rpm, 140 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm. 1.3 rotary turbo 200 bhp @ 7000 rpm, 196 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm.
Performance: 1.3/160: 0-60 in 7.2 seconds, 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds @ 88 mph. 1.3t/200: 0-60 in 6.5 seconds, 1/4 mile in 14.4 seconds @ 93 mph.
Engines: 1.3 rotary 160 bhp @ 7000 rpm, 140 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm. 1.3 rotary turbo 200 bhp @ 7000 rpm, 196 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm.
Performance: 1.3/160: 0-60 in 7.2 seconds, 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds @ 88 mph. 1.3t/200: 0-60 in 6.5 seconds, 1/4 mile in 14.4 seconds @ 93 mph.
youre looking at a 1st gen rx7. Im talking about the twin turbo ones from 91 - 01(?) Here in the US they are stated as 276hp because japan had a voluntary hp limit so they rated the cars lower, but they really make around 300 hp
anyway, back to camaros
anyway, back to camaros
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
The hood is badass, when one like it is avail i will buy, the spoiler corners stuck to the bumper just look silly, I dont care for that wing either, the stock 91-92 piece is just fine.
As for mr misguided dan...
The 3rd gen RX7 stock twin turbo engine was rated at 255 HP, so this is going to make a rocket ship out of a thirdgen ?
Oh we also wont take into account that it only was rated for 217 ft lbs of torque, thats over 100 ft lbs shy of an LT1 or an LS1.
Learn this fact, or argue with it and look stupid, that motor isnt going to make a heavy car fast, they dont make incredibile numbers, and only a few of them actually are quick, typically only in a lightweight car. We wont even get into how unreliable they are, or only making 217 ft lbs on 10 psi of boost.
So, aside from it costing more than an LT1, and being more trouble to put in, its down about 50 HP, 110 ft lbs, and requires 10 psi of boost to do it. Aside from this its rated for less fuel mileage, and in a lighter car, so you'd end up with even less mileage than when it was in an RX7, fwiw they were rated at 17/18 mpg city manual/auto and the LT1 powered RS a buddy is driving around is getting 21 MPG in the city, so 3 mpg more, with a lot more power, and gobs more torque.
Take your rotary is superior attitude elsewhere.
As for mr misguided dan...
The 3rd gen RX7 stock twin turbo engine was rated at 255 HP, so this is going to make a rocket ship out of a thirdgen ?
Oh we also wont take into account that it only was rated for 217 ft lbs of torque, thats over 100 ft lbs shy of an LT1 or an LS1.
Learn this fact, or argue with it and look stupid, that motor isnt going to make a heavy car fast, they dont make incredibile numbers, and only a few of them actually are quick, typically only in a lightweight car. We wont even get into how unreliable they are, or only making 217 ft lbs on 10 psi of boost.
So, aside from it costing more than an LT1, and being more trouble to put in, its down about 50 HP, 110 ft lbs, and requires 10 psi of boost to do it. Aside from this its rated for less fuel mileage, and in a lighter car, so you'd end up with even less mileage than when it was in an RX7, fwiw they were rated at 17/18 mpg city manual/auto and the LT1 powered RS a buddy is driving around is getting 21 MPG in the city, so 3 mpg more, with a lot more power, and gobs more torque.
Take your rotary is superior attitude elsewhere.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire County, England, UK
Car: VIN=85 T/A, CAR=82/3 T/A gfx, go figure. She's a T/A anyway!
Engine: 5.0, Holley 600 cfm 4-barrel
Transmission: THM350 ??
Think of the expanse of room you'd have in the f-body engine bay though! You could even see the floor when you open the hood 
Mark.
(Sorry, must limit irrelevant posts...)

Mark.
(Sorry, must limit irrelevant posts...)
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
wow, your doing exactly as i have dreamed in my mind! i want to make a more agressive looking front piece
wow, your doing exactly as i have dreamed in my mind! i want to make a more agressive looking front piece
Well Dan, if you cant get it locked by starting a **** name calling war, try to get it locked by changing the subject to something non thirdgen related. Great plan. At least get the facts straight ... 93+ RX7's are called FD's and the previous generation were called FC's.
Anyway, back on topic. I really like the stance in this shot:
Originally posted by Z28*****
Take your rotary is superior attitude elsewhere.
Take your rotary is superior attitude elsewhere.
and mr hawaiian, my goal in life is not to get topics locked...
sorry about getting carried away about the rotary stuff guys...
the stuff on the front of that blue camaro would look better painted
camaros rule







drooool