History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Was There Ever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 01:46 AM
  #1  
3rdHXCGen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Was There Ever

Was there ever a Third Gen Camaro made within the 10 years that they were produced that did not have an ECM?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:45 AM
  #2  
Ward's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 6
From: Rowlett, TX
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt, 3.45
Re: Was There Ever

Nope, in fact I think even all of the late second gens (like 80-81) came with ECMs, including the LG4 engine.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #3  
Darkshot's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: Was There Ever

Certain earlier model carbed Canadian export thirdgen cars did not have an ECM. These are somewhat rare though.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 04:07 AM
  #4  
Dens71TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 24
From: Midwest
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Re: Was There Ever

The Computer Command Control system was optional on LG4 305 V8 cars sold in Canada. Most people didn't order it. I'm not sure how the '82-84 2.8L V6 carbureated engines were setup for Canada.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #5  
3rdHXCGen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Re: Was There Ever

Thanks guys, Im gonna try to be on the look out for a Camaro without an ECM then even if they are rare bc I love these cars but I hate dealing with Check engine lights. Smog will always be there for these cars but at least with the ECM out of the way I could do a few things without throwing codes.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #6  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: Was There Ever

you can still do things to the cars and keep the CCC system, just have to get the chips burned is all. You can gut the ECM control and put a regular vacuum distributor and carb on the car. But if you are getting a TPI car, it would be best to keep all of that setup and get the chips burned.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #7  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: Was There Ever

I kinda like having the ECM tell me when a part fails and something is wrong. Instead of having the car run like crap and not know why. *shrug*
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
karl's-92'-z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 1
From: Paradise, Hawaii
Car: Too many cars
Re: Was There Ever

I think cars equipped with any type of injection came with an ECM & carbed cars didn't.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: Was There Ever

The carb cars in the US did have CCC on them, the carbs were controlled by the ECM with the timing and had alot of the sensors.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 01:23 AM
  #10  
Ward's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 6
From: Rowlett, TX
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt, 3.45
Re: Was There Ever

If you're hellbent on not having an ECM, it would be much easier to just convert a car to non-computer carbed than trying to find a rare factory one. Besides, even without a computer, would you still want the factory quadrajunk carb and intake? To convert a car, it doesnt really take much more than an intake, carb, and vacuum distributor. If the car is originally TBI or TPI, you can re-use the existing in-tank pump, with a regulator to lower the pressure down to carb range. I think a few people have also just disconnected the pump, and let the engine-driven pump pull fuel through it.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #11  
tanker's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Re: Was There Ever

was there ever one with stock dual exhaust..the whole way not just after the muffler
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 07:34 AM
  #12  
coolram62's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 4
From: Beaufort South Carolina
Car: 1983 Camaro Z/28
Engine: LU5 305 CFI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: J65/G80/G92-3.23
Re: Was There Ever

On the dual exhaust Tanker no is the answer in the traditional sense.The early cars had RPO-N10 which was a dual muffler setup off the single I-pipe from the cat.This was discarded on L69 cars in favor of a single hiflow muffler.

RPO-N10 was used again on the later cars for the dual cat setup but again still a single I-pipe feeding the muffler.

Starting with the L69 larger ID eahaust manifolds/y-pipe/i-pipe were used in conjuction with the free flowing monolith cat and muffler.This carried over to the majority of the TPI cars.The LG4/LO3 and LU5 shared exhaust system which is very restrictive.

My personal opinion why there wasn't a trual dual exhaust like the Fox body Mustang had was cost and lack of room underneath.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.