TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

The value of TBI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2016, 09:34 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
cosmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
The value of TBI

Back when I had a 91 RS LO3, just before I parted it out, I pulled the TBI and gave it the intake manifold off an 87 LG4, and a freshly remanufactured QJ for an 80 LG4, the only non-computer year that any 305 ever got a QJ.
I also swapped a 79 HEI.
No matter where I set the timing, it never had the response nor the torque of the TBI.
I tried a curve kit, then going back to the LO3 distributor, but neither of those worked out either.
Rather than investing in fixing the TBI, I moved on to a carbed 350 in an S-10, and I did get that one to be more responsive, torquey, and powerful than the LO3, but I still remember clearly the lesson of my experiment with ditching TBI.
I thought the LO3 was lame, but the TBI wasn't choking it, the TBI was saving it from being even worse.
It was lame, I wouldn't want an LO3, but if you have one, forget carbureting it.
Old 11-23-2016, 09:41 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,370
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: The value of TBI

This comes up a lot on the boards when people want to swap out their TBI or TPI for a carb. We try to explain that they will lose HP and MPGs but they just don't care.
Old 11-23-2016, 12:01 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
cosmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: The value of TBI

I didn't check my MPG, but I doubt it, because TBI maintains 14.7:1 for emissions, but 17:1 will work better for MPG. Any leaner than that will surge and misfire ( that what lean surge really is, misfiring )
Old 11-23-2016, 12:02 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
cosmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: The value of TBI

Also, TBI is more costly than MPEFI for trying to get much more than 300 HP.
Old 11-24-2016, 02:24 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,516
Received 73 Likes on 57 Posts
Re: The value of TBI

Originally Posted by cosmick
I pulled the TBI and gave it the intake manifold off an 87 LG4, and a freshly remanufactured QJ for an 80 LG4, the only non-computer year that any 305 ever got a QJ.
I also swapped a 79 HEI.
No matter where I set the timing, it never had the response nor the torque of the TBI.
I tried a curve kit, then going back to the LO3 distributor, but neither of those worked out either.
First Guess: The problem had nothing to do with carb vs TBI, the problem was you had a crappy carb and questionable distributor.

1. Production-line remanufactured carbs are--and always have been--a friggin' nightmare. The castings don't match, the tuning bits--jets, rods, air bleeds, fuel restrictions--are deliberately screwed-up to make the carb "universal".

2. If the carb was rebuilt properly, it was still an emissions-choked model that would have been very lean on the primaries.

The Q-Jet is an amazing device IF SET-UP PROPERLY.
Did your distributor re-curve kit include the vacuum advance? Few do, and without tuning the vacuum, it's entirely possible to wind up with FAR too much advance off-idle and in the cruise range.
Was your '79 HEI a four- or five-pin module?
Old 11-24-2016, 04:02 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
 
cosmick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Salt Lake
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: The value of TBI

Dumbarse, I just stated I had a fresh, $400, remanufactured QJet, the only carb ever calibrated specifically for a mild 305. There was no lean misfire, no surging, no fouled plugs, no black smoke, it was neither grossly rich nor grossly lean. The idle was as good as TBI. Blaming a really good carb makes you look stupid. I'm the 40-year-old pro tuner who was actually there, who knew the quality of the carb, and the condition of the 79 HE I. Who do you think you are? Get out and stay out, jerk.
Old 11-24-2016, 07:24 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,516
Received 73 Likes on 57 Posts
Re: The value of TBI

Originally Posted by cosmick
I'm the 40-year-old pro tuner who was actually there, who knew the quality of the carb, and the condition of the 79 HE I.
I'm not the one who can't make a 4-barrel/HEI run as strong as a computer-controlled (emissions-strangled) stock TBI. If I were you, I wouldn't advertise that as a "pro tuner", I can't even equal the power of GM's STOCK emissions-compliant tune.

SOMETHING was wrong with the carb, or the distributor, or the tune, or all three. I'm calling that "Case Closed" unless you've got more snappy remarks about my parentage.

Last edited by Schurkey; 11-24-2016 at 07:29 PM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.