Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2009, 03:19 PM   #51
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyCM View Post
since i already have to buy rockers why not get the 1.6 rr?
The cam you have was designed to take advantage of the 1.6 rocker so you really need use 1.6 rockers unless your heads can't handle the lift.

Who ever told you "1.6s will be unnecessary" doesn't understand the cam you have.

You can call Comp Cams tech line for some good info.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 03-31-2009, 03:45 PM   #52
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heslekrants View Post
The cam you have was designed to take advantage of the 1.6 rocker so you really need use 1.6 rockers unless your heads can't handle the lift.

Who ever told you "1.6s will be unnecessary" doesn't understand the cam you have.

You can call Comp Cams tech line for some good info.
^^^ Agreed
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 03:50 PM   #53
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

i know the heads can handle it. i got info from an AFR tech rep and he actually said to use the 195s instead of the 180s for that cam.

i was planning on the 1.6 anyway just need to find a good set at a good price. trying to keep the built under $3k and it getting close.

so the for mentioned 1.6 rockers on ebay will work nicely?
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 05:11 PM   #54
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyCM View Post
i know the heads can handle it. i got info from an AFR tech rep and he actually said to use the 195s instead of the 180s for that cam.

i was planning on the 1.6 anyway just need to find a good set at a good price. trying to keep the built under $3k and it getting close.

so the for mentioned 1.6 rockers on ebay will work nicely?
I think so, I'm very happy with the 2 sets of SS roller rockers that I've bought from them. Keep in mind that without alot of modifing these will not fit under stock valve covers.
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 01:10 AM   #55
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

how many miles have you run on the 2 sets youve purchased?
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 01:15 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
ordered these btw

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 05:52 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: ordered these btw

no i was refering to these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...Q5fAccessories
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 09:18 AM   #58
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: ordered these btw

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyCM View Post
Maybe 5K on the 383 & 10K on the 468 with the 468 seeing the north side of 7000rpms alot. The 383's tranny is setup to shift at 5800rpms at full throttle to match the peak of the cam.

The 468 is apart right now due to an internal gas leak on the Demon carb sending fuel into the oil and trashing the bearings. We inspected the rockers after 10k use and couldn't see/feel any wear. If these were alum rockers you would show some wear.
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 10:05 AM   #59
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: ordered these btw

im going to probably be picking up a set of these. would you recommend them for a daily driver?
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 10:23 AM   #60
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: ordered these btw

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyCM View Post
im going to probably be picking up a set of these. would you recommend them for a daily driver?
Yes on these SS rockers. I wouldn't put alum rockers in a daily driver. I've been down that road many times.
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 02:22 PM   #61
Senior Member
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,232
Car: 87 IROC Z RED W/T-TOPS,89 chevy 4x4
Engine: 5.7 L-98 TPI/4.3 v-6 TBI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall/700R4
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's/?

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

I`d watch out for any off brand rockers.Stainless or not.The firs set of rockers I put on my engine were cat stainless steel 1.6rr I got from pace.About 5000 miles needle bearings started going in them one at a time.Chinese made crap.I now run a set of summit 1.6 7/16 full rr.I realize it is also an off brand and alluminum but I`ve seen several guys run them with no problems.Seen guys put 100,xxx miles and more on them in a DD.Mines not a DD modt of the time unless my truck is down but I`ve put about 15,000 on them with absolutly no issues.
__________________

5.7,Stock TPI,LT4 production cam w/1.6 R.R.
ZZ4 heads,Hooker 2460 headers w/full 3" exhaust
2500 stall,3.42 gear,suspension mods.Full list of mods in VB garage.
Shadygrady is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 02:47 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

whats up shady? long time no see. thanks for the info. i just want a good low price but quality rr for this build. always open to suggestions.
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.

Last edited by navyCM; 04-02-2009 at 12:14 AM.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 02:59 PM   #63
Senior Member
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,232
Car: 87 IROC Z RED W/T-TOPS,89 chevy 4x4
Engine: 5.7 L-98 TPI/4.3 v-6 TBI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall/700R4
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's/?

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Hi Navy.I like my summit rockers.T realize they arent the best but the price was right and I`ve seen people use them with no issues.My expereince with the SS rockers may have been a fluke or just a poor choice in brand.I bought the summits cause my car was down due to the other rockers and they`ve been on there for about 2 years now.Thats a year and half longer than the SS I bought lasted.
Shadygrady is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 08:02 PM   #64
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Hey guys. I will be installing the rockers next saturday, then Ill prob be having it dynoed. Hoping for 15 horses at the motor!
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 09:23 PM   #65
Senior Member
 
Shadygrady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flowood,MS
Posts: 1,232
Car: 87 IROC Z RED W/T-TOPS,89 chevy 4x4
Engine: 5.7 L-98 TPI/4.3 v-6 TBI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall/700R4
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's/?

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

If you see 15hp at the motor I`m going to have to look into some 1.7 rr`s.Been considering it anyway.

Last edited by Shadygrady; 04-02-2009 at 09:42 PM.
Shadygrady is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 10:49 PM   #66
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89IrocZ350TPI View Post
Hey guys. I will be installing the rockers next saturday, then Ill prob be having it dynoed. Hoping for 15 horses at the motor!
which rockers did you get?
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 11:56 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by navyCM View Post
which rockers did you get?
proform. 15 my be a bit much but thats what its advertised as.
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 12:37 AM   #68
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89IrocZ350TPI View Post
Hey guys. I will be installing the rockers next saturday, then Ill prob be having it dynoed. Hoping for 15 horses at the motor!
Have you dynoed the motor the way it is already or are you going to dyno it a couple of times, swap rockers then dyno some more?

Going to the dyno tends to be a humbling experience.
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 10:09 AM   #69
Senior Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario. 2 1/2 hours from the drag strip
Posts: 998
Car: Camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heslekrants View Post

Going to the dyno tends to be a humbling experience.
The drag strip too.
The 15 hp isn't too much of a stretch provided you can tune to take advantage of the increased breathing.
In a 3650lb car, the 1.6 upgrade netted 2/10's and 2 mph which translates roughly into 313 rwhp which is up from 297rwhp before the swap. Apparently the little Vortecs respond well to the extra lift which would have been .488" as opposed to .458".
Good luck.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 01:06 PM   #70
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

I installed 1.6 rockers on all 3 of my Vortec motors and have been very happy with the results. It's the biggest bang for the buck plus an easy install for these Vortec motors(v8).
__________________
Previous F-Bodys owned: 68 SS, 68 RS, 79, 81, 81 Z28, 98

Current cars: 65 Mustang Conv, 74 454 Camaro, 90 350 Vortec TBI Camaro, 99 Suburban 383, 00 Camaro SS, 01 Firebird, 06 Mustang Pony, 08 Grand Prix GXP 5.3L V8,
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 02:08 PM   #71
Senior Member
 
tony_cogliandro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: sunny so cal.
Posts: 1,528
Car: 1990
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: ordered these btw

hello commander - did you go ahead and buy those rockers?
is you dont mine, be sure to post how they looked and worked - im going to have to get a set of ss full roller rockers and im getting info.
are you going with 1.6? what springs are you using. i know im picking your brain, but i got a set of springs, push rods, spring retainers with a zz4 cam and im trying to see what i need to get to put them into a 601 head.
looks like i will need screw in studs too - anyone here buying new ones?
well thanks for any info.
tony_cogliandro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 03:02 PM   #72
Senior Member
 
skinny z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario. 2 1/2 hours from the drag strip
Posts: 998
Car: Camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heslekrants View Post
I installed 1.6 rockers on all 3 of my Vortec motors and have been very happy with the results. It's the biggest bang for the buck plus an easy install for these Vortec motors(v8).
I see that you don't mention the push rod hole mod in your posts. I assume you haven't changed to a screw-in stud/guide plate arrangement.
skinny z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 04:05 PM   #73
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinny z View Post
I see that you don't mention the push rod hole mod in your posts. I assume you haven't changed to a screw-in stud/guide plate arrangement.
2 of my installs were self aligning 1.6 roller tip rockers so I didn't have any issues with the push rod holes on stock Vortec heads.

My other install was with an aftermarket set of Vortec alum heads that already had large pushrod holes, 7/16" screw in studs & guide plates so my non self aligning SS full roller rockers installed without any issues. I did install longer pushrods per the head manufacturer.
__________________
Previous F-Bodys owned: 68 SS, 68 RS, 79, 81, 81 Z28, 98

Current cars: 65 Mustang Conv, 74 454 Camaro, 90 350 Vortec TBI Camaro, 99 Suburban 383, 00 Camaro SS, 01 Firebird, 06 Mustang Pony, 08 Grand Prix GXP 5.3L V8,
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 07:42 PM   #74
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heslekrants View Post
Have you dynoed the motor the way it is already or are you going to dyno it a couple of times, swap rockers then dyno some more?

Going to the dyno tends to be a humbling experience.
Already had it dynoed
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 09:32 PM   #75
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by 89IrocZ350TPI View Post
Already had it dynoed
How about posting the dyno sheet?
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 09:50 PM   #76
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 83
Car: 86 iroc-z
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 lsd

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

so i am in the process of swaping out the original lb9 305 heads for a new set of vortecs i got from jegs i also got the tpi intake manifold for vortec heads now i need to know what rockers i need? and what would be a good cam?
rojas1826 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2009, 10:14 PM   #77
Junior Member
 
Heslekrants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 71
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.7L Vortec TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4 2800 stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by rojas1826 View Post
so i am in the process of swaping out the original lb9 305 heads for a new set of vortecs i got from jegs i also got the tpi intake manifold for vortec heads now i need to know what rockers i need? and what would be a good cam?
Your cam choice depends on what you want to do with the car & its driveability then rear intake/fuel, gears/torque converter need to meet the cam requirements.

Stock Vortec heads can't handle more than .480 lift without mods.

Stock Vortec heads use self aligning rockers. Type of rocker depends on how hard you plan on driving it. Not all rockers fit inside factory covers.

If you call Comp Cams they will walk you thru picking the right cam. It's easy to over cam to sound cool but run like crap.
__________________
Previous F-Bodys owned: 68 SS, 68 RS, 79, 81, 81 Z28, 98

Current cars: 65 Mustang Conv, 74 454 Camaro, 90 350 Vortec TBI Camaro, 99 Suburban 383, 00 Camaro SS, 01 Firebird, 06 Mustang Pony, 08 Grand Prix GXP 5.3L V8,

Last edited by Heslekrants; 04-03-2009 at 10:21 PM.
Heslekrants is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2009, 01:16 AM   #78
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

so what would be a good cam/head set up w/ these 1.6 rr for a daily driver? i think the set up i intended to go w/ is not going to be good for a daily driver. i want to keep good fuel economy.
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 06:50 PM   #79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Valparaiso,Chile Southamerica
Posts: 1,048
Car: 1982 S/E
Engine: 173 CID 2.8 V6
Transmission: TH200C
Axle/Gears: 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Calderone Send a message via Skype™ to Calderone
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

People still buys proform ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxROQtv7o2A
__________________
1982 Pontiac Firebird S/E,1989 CustomFormulaTaillights,1988Wraparound Wing, 1988 Formula Wheels 16 x 8 ,2.8 V6 173 Slow one TH200C,PMD Seats

LOOKIN' FOR EXCELLENT WEBDESIGN ? CHECK MY CLIENT PORTFOLIO AT :
WWW.CALDERONE-ONLINE.COM
Calderone is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 06:54 PM   #80
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,742
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Are these rocker arms decent

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calderone View Post
People still buys proform ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxROQtv7o2A
Anything can break. Thats the only case ive seen of that ever happening. Maybe it was damaged during shiping?
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Aftermarket Product Review

Tags
16, 57, 84, arm, arms, chevy, corvette, cylinder, gear, head, knock, ls1, modification, rocker, roller, summit, tip
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.