Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.
View Poll Results: Which F-body is the UGLIEST?
1st Gen 67-69
1
0.24%
2nd Gen 70 1/2 to 73
19
4.47%
2nd Gen 74-81
109
25.65%
3rd Gen 82-84
35
8.24%
3rd Gen 85-90
5
1.18%
3rd Gen 91-92
9
2.12%
4th Gen 93-97
128
30.12%
4th Gen Camaro 1998-2002
55
12.94%
4th Gen Firebird 1998-2002
16
3.76%
5th Gen
48
11.29%
Voters: 425. You may not vote on this poll

which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2010, 02:57 PM
  #201  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
3rd gen Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Z28, 2000 T/A
Engine: SBC 355, LS1
Transmission: T56, T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.73, 3.42
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Third gens are sexy. The only Fbody that looks better than 3rd gens are 67-73 Camaro's, third would have to be the 98-02 Trans Am's. To quote a buddy of mine. An LS1 camaro looks like it could kick your ***. An LS1 Trans Am looks like it is coming over to do it.
Old 11-30-2010, 03:17 PM
  #202  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jensen73110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,049
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Crap. I wasn't paying attention. Voted for early 2nd gen when I meant to vote mid/late 2nd gen.
Old 11-30-2010, 03:25 PM
  #203  
Member

 
fadedirocz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Had to vote 82-84 Thirdgens, Especially the ones with no ground effects at all. Although the 82-84 ground effects look horrid as well. Not a fan at all of them

After them the only ones uglier are the 98-02 Camaros, then the mid-late 2nd gens.
Old 11-30-2010, 03:56 PM
  #204  
Member

 
JimmyDavidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Manchester, TN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro z28/SC
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.89
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

We basically had this discussion in another thread, but it's nice having a poll to see the numbers.

Anyway, here's my thoughts(only regarding Camaros, because I haven't done nearly as much the research on Firebirds) Ugliest f-body is the 74-77. Ugliest Camaro is the 5th gen. Regardless, I voted 5th gen because it disgraces all that I like about Camaros(long and sleek instead of short and chunky)

I don't believe there should be two separate categories for 85-90 and 91-92 while you classified 74-81 in 1 category. The differences between 85-92 are minimal compared to 74-77 and 78-81. I absolutely hate the 74-77 aluminum bumpers, but I like the 78-81 much much better. I will also say the same thing about 67-69 Camaros. I hate the 67-68 while I like the 69. Some might not consider 67-68s and 69s that much different, but a complete redesign is a huge difference to me.

So I believe, if you're gonna separate 85-90 and 91-92 you should also separate 67-68 and 69, 74-77 and 78-81. Some might even argue having 74 Camaros in their own category too because in '75, they changed the rear quarter/glass. Which is a huge difference compared to a redesign of little bits of rubber and plastic moldings to dress up a car. No offense intended, just pointing something out.

And the main reason I don't like the 5th gen. 1. It's not an f-body. F-bodies have a different feel to them, something that was lost with the new platform. 2. The new Camaro is basically a much more sporty looking redesign of the Pontiac G8 to have similar features of the 1st gen Camaro. 3. I like my cars like I like my women, lol. Long and lean instead of short and chubby. I guess this ties in with my first point though. I liked the f-body wheel based much better too.

Final thing I have to say: I wonder how much money GM would have made if they remade the 69 Camaro for 2010. Of course and updated interior, safety and suspension would be mandatory. Why make a bloated version of the car everybody wants? Why not give them the car they want(Don't say the car is bloated because of safety, because that's bullshit reason I've heard in the other post. There are plenty of new cars being made that are much smaller than the Camaro, that probably have better safety features(Maybe not against Semis and tanks though but still)

Last edited by JimmyDavidson; 11-30-2010 at 03:59 PM.
Old 11-30-2010, 04:05 PM
  #205  
Moderator

iTrader: (6)
 
AmorgetRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,645
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I don't see any reason to have a second thread on this, so I merged the two (including the poll).
Old 11-30-2010, 04:06 PM
  #206  
Moderator

iTrader: (6)
 
AmorgetRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,645
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Originally Posted by jensen73110
Crap. I wasn't paying attention. Voted for early 2nd gen when I meant to vote mid/late 2nd gen.
Fixed that for ya
Old 12-01-2010, 09:55 PM
  #207  
Junior Member
 
niko89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I agree the 4th generation are the ugliest. Now I dont think any firebird is ugly I would GLADLY take a 4th gen. I think 4th gen is the worst looking but they're the most badass power wise. My absolute favorite firebird is a second generation formula. I never liked the 2nd gen trans ams(again wouldn't complain about having one)

but come on 3rd gen just look badass Theres my 89 formula at autocross.
Attached Thumbnails which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?-myfb.jpg  
Old 12-02-2010, 03:43 PM
  #208  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jensen73110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,049
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Originally Posted by JimmyDavidson
Ugliest f-body is the 74-77. I absolutely hate the 74-77 aluminum bumpers, but I like the 78-81 much much better.
Agree 100%.
'74 to '77 Camaros and Firebirds are disgusting.

Originally Posted by JimmyDavidson
Final thing I have to say: I wonder how much money GM would have made if they remade the 69 Camaro for 2010. Of course and updated interior, safety and suspension would be mandatory. Why make a bloated version of the car everybody wants? Why not give them the car they want(Don't say the car is bloated because of safety, because that's bullshit reason I've heard in the other post. There are plenty of new cars being made that are much smaller than the Camaro, that probably have better safety features(Maybe not against Semis and tanks though but still)
That's what they did. Retro body with modern safety, suspension, etc. It IS so heavy because of all the airbags, cruple zones, and other crap needed to get a high rating. Why does the Honda Accord weigh 3600 lbs? That is 1600 lbs more than the original. The current Civic is 1300 lbs heavier than the original. Same with the Camaro. People won't buy a flyweight car with 3 stars. Well, not enough people....
Old 12-02-2010, 03:51 PM
  #209  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

i hated 4th gens but now i have one.

the LS1 front ends do look like catfish, but now theres a bumper that doesn't make it look so much, it looks more aggressive.

the interior is nicer on the inside IMO. the door panels are more solid, the extra space in the side trunk panel is nice as well. plus the cupholders are pretty sweet

at a first glance many cars don't look that good, but if you take the time to look into them more, they really aren't so bad.

^^^ look what numerous art classes have done to me.
Old 12-02-2010, 09:11 PM
  #210  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
86sc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Charlotte, MI
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 sport coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 detroit locker
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

1st gens perferably 69' are my fav. But I also love early 2nd gens and 3rd gens. I would own a fifth but I would have to do something like this to it.
http://www.innovationretrokits.com/
Old 12-02-2010, 10:00 PM
  #211  
Member
 
dtk132's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 350ci 5.7L
Transmission: T-5 Borg Warner
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/ 3.42
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

every car has its potential of looking really nice. even those 2nd gens. dont like this thread at all
Old 12-02-2010, 10:16 PM
  #212  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,847
Received 213 Likes on 160 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

For me, its the later 2nd gens, and some of the early thirdgens. They just lack that performance element. A Firebird SE for example with the chrome accents is ugly.

Though I think most of the Thirdgen hate comes from the fact that they were pretty lack luster power wise. And there were far too many options. Most people have not run into a top model thirdgen so when they were in production most of them were slow.

Originally Posted by Convoy25
this is the concept i like. though i would do something about the taillights.
Thats a photoshopped Alfa Romeo 8C, it was never a camaro concept, just something an average joe did with photoshop.


Last edited by Thirdgen89GTA; 12-02-2010 at 10:19 PM.
Old 12-02-2010, 10:31 PM
  #213  
Supreme Member

 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

IROC Z is pleasing to the eye because the body propotions are so right.

Flaring RAM AIR nostrils makes LS1 Trans Am outright mean.

Most other F bodies are nice, but are distant runners up in this beauty contest.

74-77 Camaro? Crush them.

Last edited by eseibel67; 12-02-2010 at 10:34 PM.
Old 12-06-2010, 10:19 AM
  #214  
Member
 
Camaro305SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I didn't vote, I don't think any Camaros are ugly....
Old 12-06-2010, 11:06 AM
  #215  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
FryeDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85z28(sold),91 rs, 15'Mazda3GT
Engine: 5.7L V8 350 (ZZ4)
Transmission: 700r4 rebuilt with kits+ vette serv
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

Fourth gen is just ugly, and they people are just haters that third gen are so bad ***!
Old 12-06-2010, 08:48 PM
  #216  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
CamaroIROC88350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I voted for the 2nd Gen. Camaro's, years 73-1981. Seems like alot of guys think the same as I do.

3rd Gen. Camaro's, especially the late 80's IROC-Z's and early 90's Camaro Z28's are beautiful cars.
Old 12-06-2010, 09:00 PM
  #217  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

though i'm not a fan of the high rise spoiler, i'm always going back to the dove tail spoilers like on the 2nd gens
Old 12-06-2010, 09:54 PM
  #218  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
iroc-z_23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hermann, MISSOURI
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc-z Camaro t-top
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700r4 TCI const. Pres. Valve body
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi/mosuer axles
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I appreciate a fine body, no matter how young or old

Hahaha
Old 12-06-2010, 10:53 PM
  #219  
Member

 
JimmyDavidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Manchester, TN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro z28/SC
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.89
Re: Is the 3rd gen really the ugliest F-body? Place your vote

Originally Posted by jensen73110
That's what they did. Retro body with modern safety, suspension, etc. It IS so heavy because of all the airbags, cruple zones, and other crap needed to get a high rating. Why does the Honda Accord weigh 3600 lbs? That is 1600 lbs more than the original. The current Civic is 1300 lbs heavier than the original. Same with the Camaro. People won't buy a flyweight car with 3 stars. Well, not enough people....
No they made a modern looking retro body. I mean what if they made the 2010 Camaro's exterior EXACTLY like the 69's. Only with the added safety and comfort features.

I agree that the new Camaro would obviously weigh more with extra features, but it doesn't have to look like it weighs more. The designers purposely designed the 2010 Camaro to be big and bulky, not because of safety features, but because that's apparently the new standard. They widened the wheel base, made the bumpers shorter, made the roofline taller, made the doors and side taller so the car didn't look jacked up. If I'm sitting in my 4th gen at stock ride height and a 2010 Camaro pulls up, why do I have to look up to see in the window? My point was that so many people desired a 1969 Camaro, so would they have made more profit if they gave them that instead? Please don't argue that the Camaro is that size because of safety reasons, the GTO wasn't even that big, and the Corvette isn't that big(or the mustang for that matter)

On page 3, I post 2 pictures. One that compares the size differences between the two Camaros, check it out. The scale of both the cars should be somewhat close. I looked at actual figures and estimated the scale. The other picture was a photoshop of the 2010 that I believe stays true to the Camaros of the past. Basically what the 2010 would look like if it was an f-body. Wheelbase, height, length would all be pretty accurate. The picture may not be the best representation it's good enough to get an idea.

No f-body, no care No offense meant, just arguing my point.
Old 12-07-2010, 10:00 AM
  #220  
Senior Member
 
the solitaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 47798 Germany
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 RS camaro 305 TBI
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: yep, has those too (stock)
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I actually really like the 3rd gens. Also the earlier thirdgens look great to my opinion.

The problem with the F-bodies is that there seems to be no consistency in which if the two I like during any particular period the thirdgens were on offer, which GM effectively solved by ejecting the Pontiac brand.

I'm not all that fond of the first gen. Most people do not understand this, neither do I but I just have no personal attachment to the first generation F-bodies.

Then the 2nd gen comes in 1970 and I really like the 1970-1973 Camaros. Not that sold on the early 2nd gen Firebirds. The 1974 and 1977 and 1978 Firebirds again look great.

I liked the thirdgens from the start. They look completely different from the earlier generations. They look flat, wide and for lack of a better word fulfilling their purpose (even though, due to a lack of engine power they do not quite fulfill the expectations the looks provide, which, if desired can be changed with little effort however, so that's not a dealbreaking issue)

I do prefer the early camaros over the firebirds, but from 1986 onwards (the new ground effects for the GTA for me make the thirdgen firebirds to the best looking F-bodies built)

The early fourth gens look as if no one knew what they wanted to do from there on which is a bit of a shame really.
Old 12-07-2010, 02:45 PM
  #221  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by the solitaire

I'm not all that fond of the first gen. Most people do not understand this, neither do I but I just have no personal attachment to the first generation F-bodies.
i'm one of the few that do, i would choose a 1970 camaro over a 69 any day of the week.

yes the first gens are nice, but its just something i can look at at a car show and then move on.
Old 12-07-2010, 03:02 PM
  #222  
Junior Member
 
faster1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89GTA, 62' GSXR1000-SS
Engine: 406-HSR
Transmission: Nocturnal
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

93-97 is the ugliest to me.. camaro or firebird.. 74-76 was ugly for both but 77-78 trans ams are gorgeous, but i wish they would have used the small rear window (70-73)on all the 2nd gens.. but 67-69 camaro is perfect but the firebird was hidious to me

MY FAVORITE=70-73 split bumper or formula.. my dad has a 71 formula in progress with a 455 (478 now) and i can just stare at it all day + bb pontiac motors are nasty especially in those cars .. in my opinion they have the most potential of any car

Last edited by faster1k; 12-07-2010 at 03:09 PM.
Old 12-07-2010, 07:04 PM
  #223  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
topduarte's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pflugerville, Texas
Posts: 1,342
Received 434 Likes on 263 Posts
Car: 92 Heritage Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Limited Slip
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by Convoy25
i'm one of the few that do, i would choose a 1970 camaro over a 69 any day of the week.

yes the first gens are nice, but its just something i can look at at a car show and then move on.
1969 is my favorite year (year I was born) but they are everywhere and at every car show plus they win every award for the last 15+ years I have been attending car shows.

My 3rd gen was the only 3rd gen f-body at the Rudy's Car show this past year with I believe over 200 cars.

Got many compliments on how clean mine was and people wished there were more of these on the road.
Old 12-12-2010, 04:43 PM
  #224  
Senior Member

 
Dartht33bagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: L31-R 350 w/ EBL P4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I'm honestly surprised there isn't more people that hate the 70-77 ones. I thought those were terrible looking. 78-81 was great though.
Old 12-12-2010, 09:12 PM
  #225  
Member

 
fadedirocz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I absolutely love the early 2nd gen, split bumpers.



I thought everyone loved them. lol
Old 12-13-2010, 07:01 PM
  #226  
Senior Member

 
Dartht33bagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: L31-R 350 w/ EBL P4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by fadedirocz28
I absolutely love the early 2nd gen, split bumpers.



I thought everyone loved them. lol
I hate them, the front end looks terrible to me lol. I only like the late second gens.
Old 12-13-2010, 07:40 PM
  #227  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by fadedirocz28
I absolutely love the early 2nd gen, split bumpers.



I thought everyone loved them. lol
ahhhhh i do i do


if there was a drooling emoticon, it would be used right here
Old 12-22-2010, 08:58 AM
  #228  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Stevolwevol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,697
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 IROC Z, 92 RS
Engine: 305 4bbl, 305 TBI
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

The tail lights make all the difference. Just like the 65 Impala. They had three individual tail lights, but in 66 they had to f them up by changing them.
Old 12-22-2010, 09:18 AM
  #229  
Senior Member
 
oxrabidus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8l v6
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Probably the stock 3.42
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

none are as pretty as the early 2nd generation camaros, granted to me, those were the ugliest firebirds, but the pretties camaros. the coolest firebird hands down are the thirdgens...

the ugliest to me are the 90-97 4th gens, when they put the ls1 and beefed up the looked they looked better...
Old 12-22-2010, 09:38 AM
  #230  
Junior Member
 
CamaroPrince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Memphis
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro R.s
Engine: tpi 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: idk just know it came out a z28
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

i have to say 2 gen
Old 12-22-2010, 05:21 PM
  #231  
Senior Member

 
89rs454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 SS
Engine: LT1+1500$ hooker exhaust
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 bogger
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I love them all the same, you can find something ugly with all of them.
Old 12-23-2010, 07:50 AM
  #232  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

i really think if everyone spend more time around each one, it would grow on them. take the time to walk around one, look at everything, sit in it, drive it.

the first camaro i consciously recognized was a black 81. yes, i thought it was awesome.
at first, i thought 3rd gens looked terrible. (ended up being my first car)
then i thought 4th gens looked terrible. (i now have one)

i saw 70-73 split bumpers, then disowned the idea of a later 2nd gen. though dare i say it, if i was around one more, i think i would appreciate it.
Old 12-24-2010, 08:04 PM
  #233  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (6)
 
The Project's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of Toronto
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I like the 3rd gen so much.......I bought one

93-97 plastic body LT1 (OPTI) Camaro......not so much
Old 02-05-2011, 09:27 AM
  #234  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
58mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mesquite, Texas
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

this isn't even close for me. worst looking camaro, the 1998-2002 4th gen

I don't really like the big bumper cars, but I'd take a nice one of it was a good price.

I think the early 4th gens are OK, just barely, because they still kept a lot of the style cues from the 3rd gens, except they made the whole car look like it melted in the oven for a while. All the corners and edges have been blended away
Old 02-05-2011, 01:35 PM
  #235  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
K-slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91' Firebird
Engine: 3.1 LH0 V6
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

The 4th gen camaro is just not that great. It lost all it's style after 1992. The firebirds did too, but only untill 1998. The last run of the 4th gen Firebirds were sweet, with the dual pop up lights, and the 4 nostrils..
Old 02-09-2011, 01:54 PM
  #236  
Member

 
hartsmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Black IROC
Engine: 305 Quadrajet
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 273
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by Gumby
Someones mother drank n smoked while carrying them causing severe brain damage

3rd gen's are the best looking for both Camaro's and Birds

4th gen fish lip with a bad botox job Camaro's are gross.

4th gen Birds/TAs are tough muscle
I know this is old but I agree! I think 68' is the best year of the first gens.
Old 02-09-2011, 03:14 PM
  #237  
Junior Member
 
tango1112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982 Firebird
Engine: 355 CID
Transmission: 700r4
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Love my 3rd gen 82 Firebird... My first love was my 86 T/A... How could anyone think differently...
Old 02-10-2011, 12:04 AM
  #238  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
85 ZXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 Z28 T-Top 36mm sway & wonderbar
Engine: TPI L98 350 W/85 Vette Stage II ECM
Transmission: W/C T-5, alum drive shaft
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi, 3:27, PBR's, BB LS1's
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by Stevolwevol
The tail lights make all the difference. Just like the 65 Impala. They had three individual tail lights, but in 66 they had to f them up by changing them.
I agree! The Caprice SS had the thin horizontal chrome lines that made a slight improvement for the 66's though.
Old 03-05-2011, 01:05 AM
  #239  
Member

 
firehawk1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: wv
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Firebird Formula(1988 changed to 91
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73(needs changed)
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I would have to say my least favorite was the 74-77 Camaros. When they came out with the plastic bumpers in 78(thru 81) that was an improvement(i did own a 78 Camaro at one time). Other then that i would say I love all the rest. For me it was about the evolution of these cars that made me want them more and more. Both F-bodies used round lights until the Firebirds went to 4 rectangular lights in 77. Then in 82 the Camaro gets the 4 lights and the Firebirds switch to hideaways(sign of the times compared with other cars). These lasted till 92 and endured longer then any other car through the 80s to early 90's. Well except the Fox platform(Mustangs) by Ford which lasted longer but stayed ugly IMO.
The 91-92 Firebirds were the best with the new bumpers and blew me away at the first sight of one. Then the 4th gens evolved keeping the light set ups but making the cars more rounded and sleeker to complete with the competitors(Supra, Talons/Eclipes,300ZX, Stealths,Probes). I thought the 4th gen got better looking as time went on(love those Ram Air T/As in 98-02)
The 5th gen is nice but honestly I wouldn't go out and buy one. Like Jimmy said earlier, too short and chunky looking for my tastes. I like low, long and sleek. The retro styling cues doesn't do anything for me. Why go backwards when you should go forwards. Although this is excused by most since the 8 year gap between generations was allowed and most were happy to see a Camaro finally return. Will the 6th gen Camaro have cues from a 2nd gen in the next 5-10 years. It breaks the continuity of the lines of the cars over the years.
Old 03-05-2011, 07:12 AM
  #240  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

oh i love the LS1 Trans Ams

and as far as 6th gens, idk which year, 2014,'15, or '16 is the mark of the new generation. they will be lighter and have a shorter wheelbase
Old 03-05-2011, 08:01 AM
  #241  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lonestar7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firbird formula 350
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Nine Bolt
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

The 1st and 3rd gen bodies are definitely the best looking, IMO. Next best looking are the 2nd gen bodies. I like some of the 2nd gen Firebird/TAs better than the Camaros. The 5th gen cars look interesting to me in some trim packages but only because they remind me of the 1st gen styling. Lastly comes the 4th gen car. They may be great driving cars but that body style does nothing for me. They pale in comparison to the 1st and 3rd gen as far as looks go.
Old 03-06-2011, 01:14 AM
  #242  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
V8ReiMeR88MaRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 SC, 89 Silvy, 13 Cruze
Engine: LO3, LO5, LUW
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4, M40-6
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73, 3.94
Re: why are 3rd gens the "ugliest" f-body?

I like all the Gens except for a few years. My list best to worst.

1. 85-90 Camaro/70-73 Split Bumper
2. 91-92 Camaro
3. 67-69 Camaro/Firebird
4. 91-92 Firebird
5. 98-02 Firebird
6. 93-97 Firebird
7. 85-90 Firebird
8. 93-02 Camaro unless its an SLP SS in which that's tied for 3rd.

If you didn't notice I didn't mention the 2010+ Camaro as it's a Zeta Body. I good looking car none the less.
Old 03-10-2011, 07:53 AM
  #243  
Junior Member

 
lawbreaker2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: brunswick,oh
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 gta t-tops/leather
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5sp
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Wow didn't know so many pros can have so much hate for there brothers and sisters. LoL but I always say we that grew up in the 70's as a kid and a teen in the oh so great 80's have the best of both worlds. I don't hate any of them no do I hate the other cars say like a GN or stang, I love the look of a IROC with that big F-40 looking spoiler and the 3gen ta's were just to pointing looking now the 98 to 02 ta is just a badass looking car and my dream car is a 70 ta and so I bought a 70 ta, 73 formula 76 ta 80ta 81ta and a 91 gta. And would love to get a 85 ta and a 98 to 02 ta and a IROC-Z so going to have to say the 74 to 77 camaro are the ones I hate most. This was a very tough thing to do. But im sure if sombody drove by with a 74 slammed down on some 18's with a sweet *** paint job I would be all over it.
Old 03-10-2011, 08:23 AM
  #244  
Member
 
stroken85z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: south east north dakota
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z28/1981 Z28
Engine: 85 383 stroker/81 350
Transmission: 85 fortes tko 600 /81 turbo 350
Axle/Gears: G P ford 9" in proces
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

i would say the forth gen that have the sguare headlights i love my third and second gen camaros but there is a special place in my heart for my third gen
Old 03-10-2011, 08:28 AM
  #245  
Junior Member

 
lawbreaker2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: brunswick,oh
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 gta t-tops/leather
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5sp
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Oh I some times wonder if I would be a camaro person cuz back in 85 I wanted a.new trans am but could not afford one so I bought a 78 z-28 and then it was stolen from school parking lot so I then bought a 80 pace car and then it snowballed. I bought the 91GTA in 92 used with 6000 miles and I was king $hit back then but man did I have fun with that car.
Old 03-10-2011, 08:56 AM
  #246  
Supreme Member

 
cuisinartvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Ugliest camaro are you kidding?

They are all good in their own right.

Like 3rd gens sorry guys but the 67 rs is the sexiest ever.
Old 03-10-2011, 09:16 AM
  #247  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lonestar7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firbird formula 350
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Nine Bolt
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I don't hate the looks of any of them, I just like the 1st and 3rd gens the best. I think the 3rd gen Firebirds had the best exterior styling but their interiors were way too busy for my taste. I like the Camaro interiors more.
Old 04-15-2011, 01:41 AM
  #248  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
camarosrock1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Camaro RS--
Engine: MPFI
Transmission: 700r4
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

I am with you goose! I like in this order,1-3-2-5-4
I have seen a few really nice looking 4th gens, I just don't think they have much of a muscle look. 1st come on> HOT, I have always been in love with the 3rd, my first camaro was my iroc. I have seen alot of 5th Gens looking pretty nice! Color matters!
Old 04-25-2011, 04:20 AM
  #249  
Member
 
lmidden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: long island ny
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 camaro sc
Engine: lg4 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

3rd gensare the best it has a box shape but has a muscle feel to it and it has power
Old 04-25-2011, 04:26 AM
  #250  
Supreme Member

 
freaky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,074
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: 88 camaro irocz
Engine: l98 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?

Originally Posted by lmidden
3rd gensare the best it has a box shape but has a muscle feel to it and it has power
lmfao ...POWER ? you've never been in a powerful car if you think a thired gen has power stock .lmfao again .


Quick Reply: which gen is the "ugliest" f-body?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.