Difference in front and rear brakes
09-01-2005, 11:29 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Olmsted, OH
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Engine: H.O. 305 5.0L;L69
Transmission: T-5; Axle Ratio 3.73
Difference in front and rear brakes
This may be a stupid question to some but why are rear brakes always smaller than front brakes. I can understand why you would need large brakes in the front but why not have the same size all around? Wouldn't it help your stopping distance to have larger wheel brakes?
09-01-2005, 01:07 PM
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Front brakes do the majority of the work so they're usually bigger. If you go too big on the rear, you can over power them causing frequent "end arounds".
Ed
Ed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
05-10-2023 07:19 PM