Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

AEM, FAST injected SBC instead of LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2004, 09:49 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Battery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 75 & 82 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: Saginaw 4 speed
AEM, FAST injected SBC instead of LS1

Anyone running around with a aftermarket fuel injection system like DFI, AEM, or FAST on there other wise regular SBC, and if so, how much do you have into it?

Reason I ask, people left and right are wanting/doing the ls1 swap. LS1 is a cool engine and all, but in my opinion not worth half the money they sell for.

Just seems to me you could build up a bad *** SBC and retain reliability while having the potential for ultimate tuning for less money.

IE, Make more power, still be mild on the street, and cost less.
Old 03-19-2004, 11:06 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
TexasLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Angleton, TX
Posts: 3,819
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '92 RS
By the time you build up a badass small block and get any of the aftermarket computer systems, you are going to have more in it than an LS1 swap would have been for the same amount of tuneability. With LS1 edit you can do all the same things FAST and DFI can do.
Old 03-20-2004, 11:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
TA5LiterHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Transmission: 700r4 Highly Modified
I agree with Battery on this one. Parts are cheaper for a regular SBC than the LS1. It's not that expensive to get 320+ hp out of a SBC not to mention that much less money and time in fabrication to retrofit the LS1 into the car.
Old 03-21-2004, 01:56 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
TexasLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Angleton, TX
Posts: 3,819
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: '92 RS
Originally posted by TA5LiterHO
I agree with Battery on this one. Parts are cheaper for a regular SBC than the LS1. It's not that expensive to get 320+ hp out of a SBC not to mention that much less money and time in fabrication to retrofit the LS1 into the car.
I'm not disagreeing that SBC parts are cheaper than an LS1, but by the time you put an aftermarket computer system on it, you're no better off that with the LS1. Besides the fact an LS1 is going to have 320 hp when you drop it in.
Old 03-21-2004, 02:38 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
TA5LiterHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Transmission: 700r4 Highly Modified
To each his own I guess. Personally I think the original SBC looks better, sounds better and has plenty of potential. Also, fuel injection is not the only way to have a reliable daily driver. It can be done with a carb also.
Old 03-21-2004, 10:36 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
bes217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco,Ca area
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to see you get the reliability, power and fuel mileage that you can with an LS1, with a carb engine.
Old 03-21-2004, 11:41 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
TA5LiterHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Transmission: 700r4 Highly Modified
Any day of the week. May use a bit more fuel, but a carbed engine can still be fuel efficient if it is tuned right.
Old 03-22-2004, 12:25 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Battery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 75 & 82 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: Saginaw 4 speed
If you really want to get into a pissing match about it.

I have just over 2,000$ including buying the CAR in my setup.

I will put down at least 50 more to the wheels then any stock ls1.

You couldnt buy the damn motormounts for that
Old 03-22-2004, 01:32 AM
  #9  
Member
 
83_1/2 L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SillyCon Valley, CA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 83 Z-28 (Original owner)
Engine: 305 CC-carb
Transmission: Richmond 6-speed, Rear:3.73
Talk about drifting OFF SUBJECT in a hurry.
The question is LS1 vs. SBC plus spending BIG bucks on Fuel Injection.
Just a F.A.S.T. box alone cost about 2 grand.

If I was going to the trouble and expense of changing motors, I would not install a motor with the stock camshaft. By changing the camshaft on an LS1, you add a lot more power then just a cam swap adds to an LG4 or LB9.
You would need Intake/head mods on a TPI to equal a stock LS1, and once you start changing parts, the LS1 responds better.

If you don't think the LS1 design is a BIG improvement over the original SBC design, do some more research. The intake port shape and valve angles (18* vs 23*) alone make this new motor worth it.

Plus any time you remove 80-120 lbs of weight from the nose of a car, that’s worth BIG BUCKS in my book.

Last edited by 83_1/2 L69; 03-22-2004 at 01:40 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TX-SleeperC5
Firebirds for Sale
25
02-24-2016 01:34 PM
dbrochard
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
09-19-2015 08:13 PM
snakeshooter
V6
3
09-07-2015 11:13 AM
dimented24x7
Tech / General Engine
4
09-06-2015 03:51 PM
Jackrabbit501
Electronics
1
09-02-2015 09:14 PM



Quick Reply: AEM, FAST injected SBC instead of LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.