'91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
'91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Hello everyone, not sure whether this is the best place to ask this question, but there doesn't seem to be a section about basic driving questions...
I have a '92 Z28, and am now considering a '91 which isn't anywhere close to me. My car is the only 3rd gen Camaro I've ever spent any real amount of time driving. My understanding is that '92 used lots of body adhesive which provided a "tighter" driving experience. Can anyone comment as to whether the difference is noticeable between '91 and '92, or does a '91 really feel pretty much the same on the road (including during "spirited" twisty road driving)?
Thanks a million for any actual experience-based input!
I have a '92 Z28, and am now considering a '91 which isn't anywhere close to me. My car is the only 3rd gen Camaro I've ever spent any real amount of time driving. My understanding is that '92 used lots of body adhesive which provided a "tighter" driving experience. Can anyone comment as to whether the difference is noticeable between '91 and '92, or does a '91 really feel pretty much the same on the road (including during "spirited" twisty road driving)?
Thanks a million for any actual experience-based input!
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I had a 91 RS 28 years ago and was a fun car to drive. 305 5 speed. I now have a 92 z28 5.7
I did not notice much difference as I was young when I had the RS. Put almost 100k miles on it with no major issues.
The z28 is tight but does have a squeak here and there. But not major
I did not notice much difference as I was young when I had the RS. Put almost 100k miles on it with no major issues.
The z28 is tight but does have a squeak here and there. But not major
The following users liked this post:
F86 (01-18-2021)
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I had a 91 RS 28 years ago and was a fun car to drive. 305 5 speed. I now have a 92 z28 5.7
I did not notice much difference as I was young when I had the RS. Put almost 100k miles on it with no major issues.
The z28 is tight but does have a squeak here and there. But not major
I did not notice much difference as I was young when I had the RS. Put almost 100k miles on it with no major issues.
The z28 is tight but does have a squeak here and there. But not major
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 140 Likes
on
100 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I have a '91 GTA and a '91 T/A convertible. Nothing different really. If anything, I actually prefer driving the '91.
The following users liked this post:
F86 (01-18-2021)
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,345
Received 298 Likes
on
234 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
It's pretty much the same, no noticeable difference. Suspension and body mods are much more noticeable
The following users liked this post:
F86 (01-18-2021)
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I agree no real difference. The mileage, amount of abuse, and overall condition(especially the suspension components) has a lot more effect on how the car drives than what year it was made. Good luck, hopefully you will have another thirdgen soon.
The following users liked this post:
F86 (01-18-2021)
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Thanks everyone for your input. I've always wondered whether the body adhesive made a noticeable difference driving, or whether it just added a bunch of weight and goo...
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Yeah... Today I'm kind of regretting not hanging in a little longer, but I really try to keep some self discipline in auctions... Otherwise a different kind of regret can happen!
But that one really ticked boxes for me. Fixed roof, manual, G92, no stupid mods, no cracks in the sail panels. It didn't seem to have led a difficult life. Oh well.
But that one really ticked boxes for me. Fixed roof, manual, G92, no stupid mods, no cracks in the sail panels. It didn't seem to have led a difficult life. Oh well.
#10
Senior Member
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
im going against the grain a little here and saying there is a difference. the way it drives and handles will be the same. the difference that all of the seam sealer (adhesive) they used on the 92 models is that it stops almost all of the squeaks that 3rd gens are famous for.
The following users liked this post:
ev305tpi (01-22-2021)
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 140 Likes
on
100 Posts
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
My '91 is quieter than my '92. The '91 has C&C T-tops and a set of outer SFCs. The '92 is a convertible and has both inner and outer SFCs.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 727
Received 221 Likes
on
158 Posts
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 liter V-8
Transmission: 4 speed auto
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
im going against the grain a little here and saying there is a difference. the way it drives and handles will be the same. the difference that all of the seam sealer (adhesive) they used on the 92 models is that it stops almost all of the squeaks that 3rd gens are famous for.
I thought the adhesives came along with the '91s, but I'm probably wrong. I thought I'd remembered hearing about the adhesives in some of the press about Pontiac rolling out a convertible for the first time in years for 1991. One of the reasons given that Pontiac finally did launch a convertible was the tighter, quieter feel produced by these adhesives.
#13
Senior Member
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I thought the adhesives came along with the '91s, but I'm probably wrong. I thought I'd remembered hearing about the adhesives in some of the press about Pontiac rolling out a convertible for the first time in years for 1991. One of the reasons given that Pontiac finally did launch a convertible was the tighter, quieter feel produced by these adhesives.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,434
Received 723 Likes
on
492 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
My 91 T-Top car was the tightest Thirdgen I ever drove even at over 100k mi. Ive always believed it got the adhesive treatment.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Received 212 Likes
on
178 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
I’ve driven many different thirdgens of varying ages, conditions and mileage and would say that condition and mileage has more of a factor on the squeaks and rattles than anything else.
A low mileage, babied 1982 hardtop is going to be a more solid car than a 150K mile T-Top daily driver 1992.
All things being equal though, I would say there seems to be little perceptible difference in squeaks/rattles and structural integrity from about 88’ and later. The earlier cars did seem to be looser.
My Dad had a 92’ RS that he bought in 1994 with 34K miles on it and that’s the newest, lowest mile thirdgen I recall experiencing back when they were relatively new cars. Other than the T-Tops squeaking on cold days, it seemed to be a pretty solid car and didn’t have too many squeaks and rattles. I bought my 89’ GTA in 1999 with 100K miles and at that time, my Dad’s RS also had about the same mileage. Both cars were in similar condition (well cared for daily drivers). Honestly, both cars felt about the same as far as squeaks and rattles. The 92’ may have had adhesive in the seams and the 89’ didn’t, but it wasn’t very noticeable.
I had an 86’ IROC before the GTA and with 100K miles and even being a hardtop, it squeaked, rattled and creaked quite a bit. It definitely had a harder life than the GTA did, so that probably had a lot to do with it as well. Back then I also had various friends with an 83’, 84’ and an 85’ and they were more like my 86’ than my 89’ or the 92’.
So, take my personal observations for what they’re worth, but I would not consider the added adhesive a decision factor in which year car to buy. It just didn’t seem to make much of a perceptible difference, although I’m also remembering from many years ago. In any case, mileage and condition are going to be bigger factors.
A low mileage, babied 1982 hardtop is going to be a more solid car than a 150K mile T-Top daily driver 1992.
All things being equal though, I would say there seems to be little perceptible difference in squeaks/rattles and structural integrity from about 88’ and later. The earlier cars did seem to be looser.
My Dad had a 92’ RS that he bought in 1994 with 34K miles on it and that’s the newest, lowest mile thirdgen I recall experiencing back when they were relatively new cars. Other than the T-Tops squeaking on cold days, it seemed to be a pretty solid car and didn’t have too many squeaks and rattles. I bought my 89’ GTA in 1999 with 100K miles and at that time, my Dad’s RS also had about the same mileage. Both cars were in similar condition (well cared for daily drivers). Honestly, both cars felt about the same as far as squeaks and rattles. The 92’ may have had adhesive in the seams and the 89’ didn’t, but it wasn’t very noticeable.
I had an 86’ IROC before the GTA and with 100K miles and even being a hardtop, it squeaked, rattled and creaked quite a bit. It definitely had a harder life than the GTA did, so that probably had a lot to do with it as well. Back then I also had various friends with an 83’, 84’ and an 85’ and they were more like my 86’ than my 89’ or the 92’.
So, take my personal observations for what they’re worth, but I would not consider the added adhesive a decision factor in which year car to buy. It just didn’t seem to make much of a perceptible difference, although I’m also remembering from many years ago. In any case, mileage and condition are going to be bigger factors.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes
on
520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Was going to post a picture of the "glue" but I can't seem to find it. Maybe tomorrow
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MA
Posts: 732
Received 18 Likes
on
15 Posts
Car: 92 & 91 Z28 1LEs, 87 IROC-Z, 90 ZR1
Engine: L98, LT5
Transmission: 700R4, 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.42, 3.73, 3.27
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Having owned a few 92s and my 91 (which have nearly the identical miles and options), driven back to back, the 92s have far less squeaks and rattles than the previous year cars. My cars have within a couple thousand miles from each other and similar option. It's a big deal to me.
#18
Community Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
The ’91 Firebird convertible was available with the LHO 3.1L V6, the L03 5.0 V8, and the LB9 5.0 V8. Production improvements led to use of new body sealants that added to the rigidity of the body.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Long before there was an internet (at least that I was aware of), I too was under the impression that the body adhesive started sometime in '91, and that my '91 RS had it. Did a lot of reading and research on the cars before I bought mine, but I really can't recall where I thought I saw that.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,712
Received 241 Likes
on
186 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Auburn
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Mine is a late 91, July, and it is loaded with adhesive. It is a vert so that may have something to do with it but it is definitely visible on my car.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S. UTAH
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes
on
134 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z 305 LB9 AT Convertible
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: AT
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
So what did the factory do, adhesive wise? I assume they glued all the areas where panels were lap welded together? Was the adhesive applied before or after welding?
Was the adhesive semi flexible, in cured form? Like a polyurethane adhesive?
Was the adhesive semi flexible, in cured form? Like a polyurethane adhesive?
#22
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KS
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird vert
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: auto
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
In college I had a 92 Firebird convertible with 75k miles on it. Now I have a 91 Firebird convertible with 75k miles on it. There's no difference that I can tell, it still squeaks/rattles/talks to you.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes
on
520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Here is the picture I was looking for. I've seen this on the front and rear "frame rails" and a few other spots. What a surprisingly great product.
The following users liked this post:
ev305tpi (01-24-2021)
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S. UTAH
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 162 Likes
on
134 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z 305 LB9 AT Convertible
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: AT
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
So as I thought I recalled, GM applied the adhesive before welding the panels together. NICE!
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,643
Received 754 Likes
on
580 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Hmmm...I don't think I have a way of determining when my RS was built. I don't have the car any more, but do have the window sticker. Doesn't "seem" to have a date on it, but it does have a FEB in the lower right corner of the lower left box. Not sure if that means February or not.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Hmmm...I don't think I have a way of determining when my RS was built. I don't have the car any more, but do have the window sticker. Doesn't "seem" to have a date on it, but it does have a FEB in the lower right corner of the lower left box. Not sure if that means February or not.
#30
Senior Member
#32
Supreme Member
Re: '91 vs. '92 Driving Experience
Having owned a few 92s and my 91 (which have nearly the identical miles and options), driven back to back, the 92s have far less squeaks and rattles than the previous year cars. My cars have within a couple thousand miles from each other and similar option. It's a big deal to me.
I got some time in his 91 and 92 1LEs, both in mint condition (6-8k miles). It's rare to get a chance to experience comparable cars back to back these days. The 92 was noticeably better in terms of noise, vibration, harshness, squeaks, rattles... The car felt tighter. It won't equate to faster lap times, but the driving experience is of a slightly higher quality.
Again, this is some nuanced stuff and most people won't notice it; furthermore, this stuff is unnoticeable on the average beat up old thirdgen.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post