Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-12-2007, 06:36 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 327???
clearance between rods

i'm putting together my engine and have .024" between the rods. they are eagle forged rods on an eagle crank. is this too much?
327??? is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2007, 06:55 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,445
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
No.

It's a touch more than normal, but not really "too much".

An unmolested stock crank and stock rods will usually show around .012" - .015". It opens up as cranks are ground and rods re-faced on the sides. It's not at all uncommon to see that much as a result.

As long as there's not so much that the rods can move so far to the side that they hammer the Spirolox out of the pistons, it's fine.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2007, 09:31 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It's in spec- barely. GM says .025" is the top end of the recommended range.

Agreed, factory stuff in stock condition is usually down in the .012-.015" range, in my experience.

You'll be fine.

I will give you credit for even checking this measurement. So few people do. I assume you checked it by pushing the rods apart and using feeler gagues between the two rods (the right way to do it).
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2007, 11:43 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 84

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I had just the opposite 327???, mine were .008 I had to surface them and got them .011 to .013. They were factory x rods to. I think someone told me that the tighter they are it will give abit more oil pressure, you should be fine.
Slayre is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 08:26 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
327???'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 622
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 327???
yup, checked them with feeler gauges. i called a friend that does some serious race engines and he said the same things that you guys said.

the pins are pressed in.

edit: i was also wondering if it's bad to torque the head gasket down twice, as in checking piston to valve clearance with clay.

Last edited by 327???; 01-13-2007 at 08:41 PM.
327??? is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 08:48 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 5,803

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If you didn't fire the motor it shouldn't be a problem, unless the gasket has "bonded" to the head and rips chunks off when you remove the head. Never reuse it if it's been run (although I did once and didn't have a problem, so do as I say, not as I do!!).

In the future, do your V-to-P clearance checks without a gasket. Then just add the compressed gasket thickness to your readings. It also helps with radial clearance around the edge of the valve (which sometimes gets overlooked). If it's got enough radial clearance without a gasket it definitely will when you install the gasket.
Damon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 08:48 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
reuse, spirolox
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details