V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Power of the 2.8L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2003, 06:51 PM
  #101  
Supreme Member
 
icebird_1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i see your point but the way u are compareing it is wrong man.
first there is not that many stock imports that can take a stock l98, also back in the thirdgen days the l98 was the $hit. take the lg4, now its nothing compared to the new cars but back when it first came out compared to other cars it was good.
and yes every one knows there is some 350s out that are just jokes>thats y people dont put those 350 in! u r compareing the worst 350 engine to the best v6 engine. so yes a 350 is worth it if u want power>unless u plan to drop the worst 350 in and leave it stock
icebird_1981 is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 07:17 PM
  #102  
Supreme Member

 
Ovrclck350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Take a LG4 w/ 190 HP and a LH0 w/ 190 and see who gets better gas mileage.

It takes torque to move these cars.

I'm not dissing the V6....I still own one (for sale) but it's just a simple fact.

Granted technolog has gotten better, but you have to look at the time these were built. You say a V8 isn't SH*T unless it has 350HP, ok. Then I say that your 3.1/3.4/3.8 isn't **** unless it has 245. That's what Nissan Maxima's are pushing now days. You can talk all the **** you want, you can fight V8-V6 you want, but if there's one thing I've noticed, it's that everyone here on the V6 board is all gung-ho on V6's, but yet always yearn for the V8, and when they get it, they dis the V6. I'm not hating on the V6, just stating the facts.

V6's have less torque, therefore the have to put forth more effort to move these heavy cars.

3.1=191CID/140HP=.73HP/liter
L98=350CID/245HP=.70HP/liter
LB9=305CID/230HP=.75HP/liter
L03=305CID/170HP=.56HP/liter

3.1=191CID/185 ft/lbs=.97ft/lbs/liter
L98=350CID/345ft/lbs=.985ft/lbs/liter
LB9=305CID/300ft/lbs=.983ft/lbs/liter
L03=305CID/255ft/lbs=.84ft/lbs/liter


One thing is for sure. The 305TBI gus lost out on BOTH categories.
Ovrclck350 is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 07:26 PM
  #103  
Supreme Member

 
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
Originally posted by Ovrclck350

One thing is for sure. The 305TBI gus lost out on BOTH categories.
hell yeah they did

the heads those L03's came with cant flow worth a damn

sure i have a 305, but it sure as hell doesnt have those swirl port heads

nor does it have the restrictive exhaust manifolds

nor the peanut cam
1991tealRSt-topGuy is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 07:53 PM
  #104  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess your right, cant compare an old v8 from the past to a modern v6. As far as wanting a v8, i dont. It would be MUCH easier for me to get a 350 then finding a 3.4 would be.
brobert is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:07 PM
  #105  
Junior Member
 
'84TA w/L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Home: Missouri Now: KU
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 Liter v6
Transmission: 700r4 w/shift kit
my 2 cents

before anyone says i have a bias let me state some facts. i own/drive daily a '92 3.1L f-bird. it has gone almost 15 thousand miles without an oil change. she will still beat a lot of the 305 f-bodys and will still push me into my seat and will still go over 100 mph while still getting 27mpg and spinning the tires. i also have an 88 2.8L f-bird. it will also spin the tires, i dont know too much else about it because i have driven it only once after i bought it because it is a parts car. i also own an '84 TA w/L69. yes, that would be a 305 HO. the HO stands for high output. it is in bad condition, but will still spin the tires and is a little sluggish off the line however. and just so you dont think that i am bias in any way shape or form i also own an original '69 Z28 with the original 302. havent ever driven it as it is a work in progress and will be for some time. all the cars are automatics with 700r4s except the TA with a th350 and the camaro with a 4-speed. i am planning the 3.4L swap with the 3.1L. i am also planning on swapping everything on the L69 over to a 383 or 355 block. i am also planning on swapping in a 400 or bigger small block into the camaro and parting out, like i said, the 2.8. i believe that the best engine is entirely dependent on your needs. you can do the research and ask people who own the cars. but you'll make the rite choice if you continually search the boards. if you ask it, someone will answer.
'84TA w/L69 is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:09 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Wow I just went through this same discussion on s-series.org about doing my hybrid turbocharged swap vs a '96+ Vortec 5.7 swap, I still stand by my sediments that the V6 can be made to work well, very well, sure I could have swapped a SBC into my truck, in fact that's why I bought my truck, for daily driving/towing/SBC swap, but then decided to do something different and more along the lines of what I will be doing in my other car for some research, and get used to the way this design works, and I did it very inexpensivley, I didn't want to be just another SBC S-series.

I get more respect and the "holy **** factor" than I would have, had I swapped in a SBC, I could have had the SBC and tranny for free, but it just wasn't appealing anymore. A firend of mine with a SBC S-10 and I ran, and I was gaining on him when I shifted to 3rd, if he gets his truck running again by Friday we'll be running each other at the track, which was the plan last week, but he tore up his cam a few days before, and the track closed just as I was going to pull into the staging lanes due to weather.
This Friday is supposed to be nice, so I will be there.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:52 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
dennis6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
The camaro and firebird perfomance legacy is based on the V8 aside from the TTA. I don't think even a 350 hp 2.8 running 12's will get as much respect as a 550hp 350. The 550 hp would be cheaper too.

S10's were never V8 vehicles and the 4.3 is a good motor, no reason to swap in a V8.
dennis6 is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 09:04 PM
  #108  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
OK... comparing a 3700lbs 2nd gen with a 185hp 400 to a lighter 3.4 is kinda wrong... for one, doing just true dual exhaust will turn that 400 right past the 3.4.

If you're rebuilding 2 engines... one a 400, the other a 3.4 (like 207ci?) which will end up with more power, for less $$??

There is no replacement for displacement. Short of forced induction.

There is only one thing wrong with the 60 degree V6. NO aftermarket. This is more aggrevating than working on a 455 Buick... *grumbles*

As said, though, some of us on the boards are working on fixing that.
Doward is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 12:36 AM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
deniss, it's not a 4.3 those are dogs IMO, poor design when you have to add a balace shaft (which I know is only on the '92 and up 4.3s...), but still belong in the scrap heap IMO.

My build is also a 660, that once tuned will go against just about any V8, I don't really care if I win or lose, but will give a good run, ok, except for those running single digits LOL.

And if the truck doesn't give a good run, my other 660 once built (in my project car) will.

Ok, heres a question, which will get more respect?

A V8 making 800 HP or a 660 making 600HP?

I can already hang or be in front of quite a few V8s around, I just hope the weather is good this week, I need some time slips, and some tuning time with objective results.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 10:45 AM
  #110  
Supreme Member

 
redraif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by icebird_1981
i see your point but the way u are compareing it is wrong man.
first there is not that many stock imports that can take a stock l98, also back in the thirdgen days the l98 was the $hit. take the lg4, now its nothing compared to the new cars but back when it first came out compared to other cars it was good.
and yes every one knows there is some 350s out that are just jokes>thats y people dont put those 350 in! u r compareing the worst 350 engine to the best v6 engine. so yes a 350 is worth it if u want power>unless u plan to drop the worst 350 in and leave it stock
This is LT1guy on Redraif's logon...and I have to ask, how old are you? Not to knock anybody with a TPI 350, but performance wise all of the thirdgens, except the TTA, were the underdogs when compared to the turbo Buicks and LX 5.0 Mustangs running around then. Stock for stock, either would waste the typical 350 IROC, and both were easier and cheaper to modify. For less than $1000, you could put either car in the twelves, and not with nitrous either...you'd have to spend far more than that on the TPI to get the same results. Don't get me wrong, I love the cars, but they weren't the pavement-ripping supercars that some people today seem to believe. They have as much or more POTENTIAL as anything made in that era, but they were unfortunately more about image than straight line performance.
redraif is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 02:35 PM
  #111  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Damn, this is one hell of a bitch fest, eh?
TomP is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 03:30 PM
  #112  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by redraif
This is LT1guy on Redraif's logon...and I have to ask, how old are you? Not to knock anybody with a TPI 350, but performance wise all of the thirdgens, except the TTA, were the underdogs when compared to the turbo Buicks and LX 5.0 Mustangs running around then. Stock for stock, either would waste the typical 350 IROC, and both were easier and cheaper to modify. For less than $1000, you could put either car in the twelves, and not with nitrous either...you'd have to spend far more than that on the TPI to get the same results. Don't get me wrong, I love the cars, but they weren't the pavement-ripping supercars that some people today seem to believe. They have as much or more POTENTIAL as anything made in that era, but they were unfortunately more about image than straight line performance.
This is ture, i have had an 83 0r 84 ( cant remember right now ) lx 5.0 and a 98 gt and both of them would out run any iroc but they were not as good as far as cornering.
brobert is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 05:37 PM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
dennis6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
They did put a Vortec Supercharger on a 4.3 and it held 500 hp. It was in October 01 or 02. I don't remember which magazine. I do agree having to have a balance shaft is pretty stupid. They should have done a little more than chop two cylinders off the 350 and call it a 4.3.

A 60 degree V6 putting off 600 HP will get you more respect as a engine builder than a 800 HP V8. I would rather build a 1200HP V8 though, or you could build a 800HP 305. LOL Any of those will bring alot of respect. I just don't understand why people invest more money for less power. If you want to do it just to do it great. However, there are a few people pushing the 3.4 as a means for the average person to have a performance vehicle, and this is just not true. It takes an expierenced engine builder to pull any serious power out of a 60 degree V6.


Originally posted by The_Raven
deniss, it's not a 4.3 those are dogs IMO, poor design when you have to add a balace shaft (which I know is only on the '92 and up 4.3s...), but still belong in the scrap heap IMO.

My build is also a 660, that once tuned will go against just about any V8, I don't really care if I win or lose, but will give a good run, ok, except for those running single digits LOL.

And if the truck doesn't give a good run, my other 660 once built (in my project car) will.

Ok, heres a question, which will get more respect?

A V8 making 800 HP or a 660 making 600HP?

I can already hang or be in front of quite a few V8s around, I just hope the weather is good this week, I need some time slips, and some tuning time with objective results.
dennis6 is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 05:38 PM
  #114  
Junior Member
 
'84TA w/L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Home: Missouri Now: KU
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 Liter v6
Transmission: 700r4 w/shift kit
wow, tomp, that really helped things along.

just kidding. you just said what im sure most of us were thinking.
'84TA w/L69 is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 08:18 PM
  #115  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This post has gone WAY off base since it was started
brobert is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 12:28 PM
  #116  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Heh, I figured everyone could use a laugh; myself included.
TomP is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 03:53 PM
  #117  
Supreme Member
 
CamaroRS385hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Augusta/Valdosta, GA
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
Daishi - i dont know if you own a 2.8 camaro yet or you were thinking about buying one...but since you're obviously interested in power, don't get the 2.8. you can find 3.1's for the exact same price, and 5.0's in good condition for not much more. if you're going to shell out a couple grand on a camaro, dont get the 2.8 if you want speed.

(lol bet what i said sounds off-topic, since the actual topic of the thread hasn't been touched since like the 4th post.)
CamaroRS385hp is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 04:47 PM
  #118  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
LT1guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by CamaroRS385hp
Daishi - i dont know if you own a 2.8 camaro yet or you were thinking about buying one...but since you're obviously interested in power, don't get the 2.8. you can find 3.1's for the exact same price, and 5.0's in good condition for not much more. if you're going to shell out a couple grand on a camaro, dont get the 2.8 if you want speed.

(lol bet what i said sounds off-topic, since the actual topic of the thread hasn't been touched since like the 4th post.)
Or better yet...find an ex-5.0 car that someone has already swapped to a decent small block (350, 383, 406, etc). You'll be that much ahead of the game, and swaps are more common than you'd think. Not many people rebuild 305s.
LT1guy is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 09:10 PM
  #119  
Supreme Member

 
Ovrclck350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This thread got way off topic
Ovrclck350 is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 04:18 AM
  #120  
Member

 
87CamaroMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Johnstown, PA.
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Chevy Cobalt & Camaro
Engine: 2.2 DOHC/3.1
Transmission: Not so slushy slush box/Slush Box
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23
Wait I am confused now... I do not have posi but when i floor it when moving or spin out its 2 tire marks every time... but I know it switches from on wheel to the other when needed.. I got stuck in a snow drift and watched them.. I have no clue if my rear is stock or not... The car was butcherd when I got it.. and when in park and the rear is jacked up, if you turn one wheel by hand the other spins the opposite way.. what kinda rear would that be.


edit: I didn't see there was a 2nd page to this thread so you may have stopped talking about the rear thing...

Last edited by 87CamaroMan; 10-09-2003 at 04:21 AM.
87CamaroMan is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 05:43 AM
  #121  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at the code on the rear, here is a chart to help you.Im not getting back into the rear posi conversation again..
Attached Thumbnails Power of the 2.8L-axel.jpg  
brobert is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 01:19 PM
  #122  
Supreme Member

 
Ovrclck350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ok, sorry i didn't have time to respond to your email.

If you look at that chart, it lists the codes for the types of gears put into the units. If you have Posi, you still have a RPO of G80 in which case the 2HR 3.42's would have been used, but you'd still have an RPO of G80.
Ovrclck350 is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 02:05 PM
  #123  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Sounds like you've got a G92/G80 IROC or T/A rear end.
Doward is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 02:10 PM
  #124  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ovrclck350
Keep in mind, I'm not trying to be a smartass....

6 or 8
V6 with a factory Posi

Last edited by 1badTTA; 10-10-2003 at 03:11 PM.
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 03:10 PM
  #125  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for the F-Bodys with 2.8's, they are a descent engine for longevity and reliability, but like any other engine ever made, once you start modifying them they won't be nearly as reliable since they are doing more than they were designed to do (and most people will end up overlooking something in the list of modifications such as fuel or timing requirements).

As has been stated earlier, if you are looking for lots of power, the 2.8 isn't the way to go. You will be able to get roughly the gas mileage out of other larger engines that put out more power. Needless to say if you plan on buying a 2.8 and modifying it to make as much power as a stock 350TPI then you should really start looking at the 350TPI cars to buy. If you are getting a smoking deal on the 2.8 car (buying it off your mother with 30,000 miles for $1500) then go for it but don't plan on doing a few bolt ons and running 13's and being able to drive it for the next 200,000 miles with no problems.

If you are serious about an engine swap and want a V6, look into the 3800 series II engines. They can be had both NA and Supercharged, will put out WAY more power than a 2.8 will and can be modified with great results.

Just my $.02
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 05:15 PM
  #126  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1badTTA
V6 with a factory Posi
HE originaly was talking about people not telling the diff between a ta and a firebird. Then it was switched into the v6 or v8 post as you can see. But oh well that convo is over with now lol
brobert is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 06:42 PM
  #127  
Supreme Member

 
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
Originally posted by Lee7
sorry to bring the bad news to you, but the 350 in 3rd gens are not a "performance engine" either. 245hp out of 350ci is laughable, its more like an inefficient piece of **** than a performance engine.

Sure you can MAKE it into a performance engine, but you can do the same with the V6's. But of course its better to you because its a V8, ive seen honda civics that would put your V8 mentality to shame.

Yeah, V8's kick mucho *** when they are pushing at least 350hp, but its a shame to see such a huge *** engine putting out anything less.

efficiency > displacement.
ok smart guy, show me where i said it was a performance engine

now that i stopped you from putting words in my mouth, i can show you many a 350 that make mega power

since when were honda's part of this conversation?

hondas CAN be quick because they are light

they dont need much power to be quick

thats a moot point, because we are talking about 3500 pound cars

3rd gens arent light, sorry to let you in on that fact

fastest i ever heard of a 660 running was low 14's

show me some 660's that can beat modded 350's

then we can talk

Last edited by 1991tealRSt-topGuy; 10-10-2003 at 06:45 PM.
1991tealRSt-topGuy is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 08:16 PM
  #128  
Supreme Member

 
Ovrclck350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by brobert
HE originaly was talking about people not telling the diff between a ta and a firebird. Then it was switched into the v6 or v8 post as you can see. But oh well that convo is over with now lol
But he's right....that is one (well 1500 actually) V6 with factory Posi.
Ovrclck350 is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 04:27 PM
  #129  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually 1550 plus 5 pilot cars, but close enough.

Next thing someone will try saying that all Trans Ams came from the factory with V8's
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 07:38 PM
  #130  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the firebird was not avalible in the color red untill the 4th gen!
brobert is offline  
Old 10-11-2003, 08:13 PM
  #131  
Supreme Member

 
Ovrclck350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by 1badTTA
Actually 1550 plus 5 pilot cars, but close enough.

Next thing someone will try saying that all Trans Ams came from the factory with V8's
I was going to put 1550 but that 50 has been dabated back and forth. Personally I believe 1550, but....I didn't feel like arguing.



This older guy driving an El Camino asked me what I had in mine after I got beat one day. When I told him 305, he informed me that my car is NOT a real Z28 because ALL Z28's came with 350's.
Ovrclck350 is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 01:49 AM
  #132  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by brobert
And the firebird was not avalible in the color red untill the 4th gen!
Look up the '79 Red Bird...

I really hope you were being sarcastic
Doward is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 02:09 AM
  #133  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Doward
Look up the '79 Red Bird...

I really hope you were being sarcastic
Of course i was
brobert is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 12:56 PM
  #134  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by brobert
And the firebird was not avalible in the color red untill the 4th gen!
So all the first gens (67-69) that are red were repainted....LOL

G0D I love misinformation!!!

Edit: Why is the word "g0d" bleeped out on this board?
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 08:54 PM
  #135  
Senior Member
 
dennis6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Good question...
dennis6 is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 12:55 AM
  #136  
Junior Member
 
Pyroja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: None! =(
Engine: My own two feet.
Transmission: My, uh.. Knees?
I hope this is on topic?

Hey folks, I'm new to the boards. Heck, I'm new to the realm of Camaros. In fact, the car I speak of will be my first car.

A mechanic who lives next door ofered me a great deal on a 1985 Camaro with a 2.8L V6. See, his ex-wife wants himto sell it for $1500, but he says for me he'll let me have it for $700. Not only that, but he won't sell it to me until he's got it to pass smog. Seems like a sweet deal to me, eh? Granted, there's a Z28 parked nearby for $700, too.. But any Z28 that's sat outside for 2 weeks for $700.. And HASN'T sold must have something ***-awful wrong with it. The V6, I know, runs.

What I was wanting to know is.. Well, is there anything I should really know right off the bat? Anything to do once I get it to make sure it's in top running order? Again, this will be my first car, and I'm more a computer geek than a car nut (I hope to change that!) so this is all quite new to me.

Also, as I am a 16 year old male, I feel obligated to ask what are the simplest things I can do to(what will soon be) my car to make it.. Well, a little bit faster. I have the feeling 135hp just won't be enough. Actually, I get that feeling because my grandma's '94 Lumina has the 3.1L V6 in it, hence.. My grandma's sedan goes faster than my Camaro I want to change that. Any suggestions, comment,s whatever, I don't care.. Any input would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Pyroja is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 04:30 AM
  #137  
Member

 
87CamaroMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Johnstown, PA.
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Chevy Cobalt & Camaro
Engine: 2.2 DOHC/3.1
Transmission: Not so slushy slush box/Slush Box
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23
I know if I had my camaro when I was 16 I probably would be roadkill (if it was V8) My advice would be. Think about how much you trust you driving skills they probably arn't that developed yet. You should start out with the v6 and do a few mods. There not made for racing really just to drive around. And you gotta think about what area you live in if you live in a area that snows. Your not going anywhere in the winter with a v8. I drove my v6 everywhere in the winter. got stuck only once ( I was on my way to the tire shop to get my winters put on)... And V8's drink the gas. What you have to do is take all of you pro's and con's and analize them.. Just don;t buy a car because its gotta bigger engine and has more power. You should also look into what kinda condition both cars are in ex: body, frame, suspension, tranny, I think you get the Idea. camaro's and firebirds are know to blow trannys from 87-1/2 and down. Are you just looking for a dependable car that you can somewhat show off, or a car that you can just show off and "look cool" doing it. I am only 19 and I had to prove to myself that I could be responsobile enough to go from a 2.8lt-3.4lt.

If you buy the 2.8lt you can drop a 3.4lt into it thoes run stock around 160hp and about 200lbs tq its the same basic block just a larger bore and longer stroke. I am a "computer geek also" I only really started being a gear head for the past year and already changed 2 trannys and 1 engine.

Anyway don't want to sound like anyones parent here... Just trying to help.
87CamaroMan is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 05:12 AM
  #138  
Supreme Member

 
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
sorry, cant agree with that above statement........if you really want a V8, get a V8, you'll save yourself a ton of headaches (and heartaches for that matter) in the long run
1991tealRSt-topGuy is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 09:58 AM
  #139  
Supreme Member
 
CamaroRS385hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Augusta/Valdosta, GA
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: auto
yeah, you were talking about how it'd suck to get beat by your grandma's car...with a 2.8, all granny cars will blow you away. pretty much all cars period will beat you. you might be able to take some small ricers, and some geo's, but for the most part you'll get beat by almost anything that is actually racing you. i just bought an '87 Iroc-Z, so I have 225hp, 330 lbs/torque, but i still get beat by way too many things on the road. to make a 2.8 pump out the numbers of a 5.7, you'd have to pour THOUSANDS into the car, and then when you got there (if it's even possible to) you still would be slower than the new sedans out on the road. my advice - pass up the deal on the 2.8....you don't want a daily driver for $700 anyway. look around for a v-8, preferably one with a 350. at least then you'll have respectable power, since it seems like what you're looking for is power. trust me, my first camaro was a 3.1.....it seemed fine for a while, but if you want power, it gets old real quick. that's why i owned the 3.1 for a little over a year, then got the 5.7
CamaroRS385hp is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 11:38 AM
  #140  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is it that so many people come on here and say, "hello, i was gonna buy a "V6" cam/fire, are they good for racing"? Dont you think if they were good for racing that no one woulda bought the z28s and ta's? DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or they say hey i want a v8 so ill put in a 4.3 cuz its almost a v8, Uh NO. If you want a v8 then buy one.Also look at the prices on these cars. Near me the v6 counterparts are selling for $1500 and up with over 150K on them. Think about the work going from v6 to v8.Get what you want the first time.I got very lucky with mine, the lot thought it needed a new computer . Turned out it had a vac hose completely missing. Only problem i had with it so far was the coil went. But i had an old mustang coil laying around so i put that in.
brobert is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 11:41 AM
  #141  
Member
 
DJsyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The V6 part of this board does a lot of V6 bashing.
DJsyclone is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 11:47 AM
  #142  
Junior Member
 
brobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DJsyclone
The V6 part of this board does a lot of V6 bashing.
Im not bashing, i am very happy with my car the way it is. I joke sometimes about getting beat by a school bus but its just a joke. It just gets annoying how these people come on the v6 bord and ask "should i get a v8?" We should be disscusing cams,injection,who the hell has headders, etc.
brobert is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 11:51 AM
  #143  
Supreme Member

 
TomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by DJsyclone
The V6 part of this board does a lot of V6 bashing.
Yeah right? I'm confused about it too.
TomP is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 01:58 PM
  #144  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being 16 years old, I would recomend the V-6 Camaro. You will have a descent looking car that the insurance is much cheaper on and will do a better job of keeping you out of trouble. The last thing you want is a car that either you cant afford to drive due to insurance and gas prices, can't drive because of getting too many tickets in, or can't drive because it is always broke (the V-8 Camaro he speaks of doesn't sound too reliable). We all want the most power possible, but for a minute just think with the big head and not the little one. In my opinion it isn't worth the extra expense of having an underpowered V8 instead of an underpowered V6. Neither car will be very fast if all stock and in this situation the V6 would be a much better option.

JMHO
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 04:34 PM
  #145  
Junior Member
 
'84TA w/L69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Home: Missouri Now: KU
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 Liter v6
Transmission: 700r4 w/shift kit
i agree very much with 1badtta. i was 14 when i bought my first car, a '69 Z28. it needs a lot of work and insurance will be killer on me util im like in my lat 40s anyways. then when i got closer to 16 i started to think things out. gas prices, insurance prices, tickets, etc.... me and my dad looked at a lot of v8s and v6s. i chose a v6 and figured the cash i save now on things can be put into a v8 later. i love my v6 and will have it till the day i die. but still be careful, trust me you can get tickets in a v6. i dont care what some of the people in the v6 forum say. they are just bored and dont have lives, so they come here to bash us with v6s....even though i own both v6s and v8s. so, i guess im an exception.
'84TA w/L69 is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 04:38 PM
  #146  
Junior Member
 
Pyroja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: None! =(
Engine: My own two feet.
Transmission: My, uh.. Knees?
Thanks folks.

Thanks for the input guys. I read the readme post and I read about TomP's TuneUp... Seems like alot of stuff to do, but I think the experience would be worth it. I've pretty much decided on the V6 Camaro because.. Well, for one, it's a car that's only $700. It's in generally good shape (I drove it once), and it does look cool (Paint could use fixing...). I figure, if I can do the tune up and make sure the engine is running as well as I can get it, and I make the interior all nice and clean, and I generally ge tthe car in pretty good condition, I could sell it for a profit and go buy something else.

Basically, it seems like a good car to start with because I'll learn basic mechanic-type things, and I'll learn how to maintain a car and the like. I can take the experience there (and the profit from selling the car) and apply it to something better (Like.. A V8 Camaro? Or one of the 4th Gens with the 3.8 V6? Those look nice! Then again, I'm 16.. I'm open to almost any kind of car, heh).

I saw someone mention that a $700 daily driver wasn't good... Why? I've seen worse cars than this for twice the price (Believe me, I have. My dad and I do web advertising for used car dealers.). Completely ignoring the fact that it's a Camaro and looks cool and all.. It's a decent car fo $700. I'd bite at that even if it were an old Honda or something. Maybe.

But back to the point... Thanks for the info. I anxiously await finally purchasing the Camaro and learning my way around under the hood.
Pyroja is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 05:00 PM
  #147  
Supreme Member

 
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
Originally posted by DJsyclone
The V6 part of this board does a lot of V6 bashing.
i had to suffer with a weak-kneed 3.1 for 3 years

it sucked, it couldnt get out of its own way

show me someone who can smoke my 305 with a 660 with the price of the 660 mods less than what it cost me to do my swap, and i will eat my hat

doesnt look like i will be eating my hat anytime soon
1991tealRSt-topGuy is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 07:01 PM
  #148  
Junior Member
 
1badTTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys need to quit knocking the V6's, remember tha fastest and quickest 3rd Gen was a V6!!!!! Said car also has twice the book value of the rest of the 3rd Gens also. And yes I am predjudiced towards the TTA's, but face it, it is still a V6 that eats V8's for breakfast lunch and dinner.
1badTTA is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 07:29 PM
  #149  
Supreme Member

 
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
i never said anything bad about the 3.8 did i?

thats an apples and oranges issue my friend, apples and oranges

i'm tyring to help these guys save face, before they make the same mistake i made

and yes, thats where my bitterness for the 660 comes from, the mistake i made in buying one
1991tealRSt-topGuy is offline  
Old 10-15-2003, 07:36 PM
  #150  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by 1991tealRSt-topGuy
i had to suffer with a weak-kneed 3.1 for 3 years

it sucked, it couldnt get out of its own way

show me someone who can smoke my 305 with a 660 with the price of the 660 mods less than what it cost me to do my swap, and i will eat my hat

doesnt look like i will be eating my hat anytime soon

So, How much do you have in your swap?
The_Raven is offline  


Quick Reply: Power of the 2.8L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.