Why Such a Difference?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Why Such a Difference?
Ok, so i go to the University of Northwestern Ohio, it's one of the leading automotive college's. A kid there has honda civic with almost 1k horsepower, out of what a 1.8? So my question is how come its so hard to get over 250 horses with a built 3.4 in a camaro?
#2
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Why Such a Difference?
1.8L thats no stock block, how big are turbo(s)? Probably suck the clothes right off of you 10 ft away. , 2JZ (Supra) can handle 1000hp on it's bottom end and its only 3000cc. A little smaller than our engines. Back to thirdgens. 3.4L with a turbo should do it i think. The key ingredient in any build weither its a 1.0 I4 or 8.4L V10 is money. Anything is possible with money.
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: dayton, oh
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85z-28
Engine: gm goodwrench 350
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: stock, 3.08 one wheel peel!
#5
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: Why Such a Difference?
The heads in that Honda probably flow very well, not to mention he has to be pushing alot of boost to make those numbers. Our heads flow like crap, the aluminum heads flow alot better than ours. Also since it is an I4 it is easier to get the air in/out.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Also I WAS a honda guy untill I realized I can go faster with a Chevy
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why Such a Difference?
University of Northwestern Ohio, and he had the car on one of 2 chassis dyno and it said 1k.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
LMAO do not listen to him with stock internals he will never make over 260-300hp. His max boost is around 12psi on a t3/t4 turbo. It dosent seem like a lot but that is 13 in the 1/4mile easy. If he did build the block its no longer a 1.8L, the 1.8 usualy slang that refers to the block size. Ex: His enigne is a B18a, B18b, B18c or B18c5... instead of saying that he would just say 1.8L. Also Stoopid Tuned maxed out around 600-700 hp. There is one stronger B18 but it doubt its your friend...What school you said you went to again?
Also I WAS a honda guy untill I realized I can go faster with a Chevy
Also I WAS a honda guy untill I realized I can go faster with a Chevy
So anytime an engine is built or rebuilt it is no longer what it was in displacment? Sounds like you need to learn a bit more about engine building and rebuilding.
The "B" refers to the series, the "18" is in refrence to how many CCs that engine has for the bore and stroke combination, to differentiate it from other B series engines. I know many built and rebuilt Hondas that are still the same dicplacement they were from the factory.
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Firebird, 1953 CJ3B
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Why Such a Difference?
big *** turbos and huge nitrous spray along with everything upgraded ei ign, heads, exuast...ect
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
So anytime an engine is built or rebuilt it is no longer what it was in displacment? Sounds like you need to learn a bit more about engine building and rebuilding.
The "B" refers to the series, the "18" is in refrence to how many CCs that engine has for the bore and stroke combination, to differentiate it from other B series engines. I know many built and rebuilt Hondas that are still the same dicplacement they were from the factory.
----------
Well I would like to see the results, if that is not a problem. If its true I would of heard of your friend so would the rest of the honda community.
Last edited by Iluvspd; 12-25-2007 at 10:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
[quote=Six_Shooter;3576470]That's what I said, 18 = 1800 cc. :roll:
Yes displacement can be changed all b series have intercangeable parts ex: B16 B17 B18 B20 any one of these engines can be converted to another by stroke bore and head click for a reference http://hondaswap.com/engine-building...ing-b18-84394/ LOL
I believe the guys question was how come his V6 cannot make such power so lets get back on topic " Not a Honda Site"
Yes displacement can be changed all b series have intercangeable parts ex: B16 B17 B18 B20 any one of these engines can be converted to another by stroke bore and head click for a reference http://hondaswap.com/engine-building...ing-b18-84394/ LOL
I believe the guys question was how come his V6 cannot make such power so lets get back on topic " Not a Honda Site"
Last edited by Iluvspd; 12-26-2007 at 12:07 AM. Reason: Not A Honda Site
#14
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Moberly Missouri
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L (planning for a turbo)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Why Such a Difference?
the V6 can do it, just needs some more time for people to create the parts for it. honda some how got insane aftermarket support. the V6 in the F bodys has basicly been built by the comunity with little aftermarket support. Some of our members have created turbo kits, custom intake setups, changed their igniton setups and even swaped entire top ends from newer FWD cars to get better flow and power.
My question is, what RPM was that HP made at?
My question is, what RPM was that HP made at?
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Im not sure what the Rpm it was, all i know is he put it on the dyno and thats what the dyno showed on the screen. This could all be made up but ive heard alot of people talk about it, so i dont know.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
His rpm would be in the neighborhood of 12.5-14.5k and his 1/4 mile is mid 10's for a 1k hp civic. To match or exceed that would would need an engine that has strong aftermarket support (350) nothing more or less because of the 3rd gen weight unless you already have her stripped down. I would'nt count too much on the V6 but with enough fabrication skills anything is possible. Dont give up I would check into GM 3.8L and see its limits.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Haha less than 10's, you're talkin a 2200lb car, with over 1000 horsepower. high 8's if there's a tail wind.
The reason he can also make over 1000 horsepower is one simple thing, technology. Our cars were built in the 80's, his is most likely more recent, most likely built from an aluminum block, with aluminum heads. The 3.4, straight out of the 93-95 F-body is all Iron.
The reason he can also make over 1000 horsepower is one simple thing, technology. Our cars were built in the 80's, his is most likely more recent, most likely built from an aluminum block, with aluminum heads. The 3.4, straight out of the 93-95 F-body is all Iron.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canada, Vancouver Island
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 T-Top Camaro RS
Engine: engineless
Transmission: Trannyless
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt/3.08. soon to be axleless
Re: Why Such a Difference?
i would ask him for a dyno sheet if he has one to see if he really has 1000hp.
im sure he has aton of money to make him little engine have that much hp as well. and why would even want a 1000hp civic? i even got a civic and there pure crap lol tho i take mine off road and do things you shouldnt be doing a car but its a civic. ill see how long this car will last me. tho its a '83 civic and i paid $200 for it! see if they are unbreakable. (my friends call em that) anyways. im sure that civic sounds like crap with there huge mufflers on the back.
im sure he has aton of money to make him little engine have that much hp as well. and why would even want a 1000hp civic? i even got a civic and there pure crap lol tho i take mine off road and do things you shouldnt be doing a car but its a civic. ill see how long this car will last me. tho its a '83 civic and i paid $200 for it! see if they are unbreakable. (my friends call em that) anyways. im sure that civic sounds like crap with there huge mufflers on the back.
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Haha less than 10's, you're talkin a 2200lb car, with over 1000 horsepower. high 8's if there's a tail wind.
The reason he can also make over 1000 horsepower is one simple thing, technology. Our cars were built in the 80's, his is most likely more recent, most likely built from an aluminum block, with aluminum heads. The 3.4, straight out of the 93-95 F-body is all Iron.
The reason he can also make over 1000 horsepower is one simple thing, technology. Our cars were built in the 80's, his is most likely more recent, most likely built from an aluminum block, with aluminum heads. The 3.4, straight out of the 93-95 F-body is all Iron.
----------
i would ask him for a dyno sheet if he has one to see if he really has 1000hp.
im sure he has aton of money to make him little engine have that much hp as well. and why would even want a 1000hp civic? i even got a civic and there pure crap lol tho i take mine off road and do things you shouldnt be doing a car but its a civic. ill see how long this car will last me. tho its a '83 civic and i paid $200 for it! see if they are unbreakable. (my friends call em that) anyways. im sure that civic sounds like crap with there huge mufflers on the back.
im sure he has aton of money to make him little engine have that much hp as well. and why would even want a 1000hp civic? i even got a civic and there pure crap lol tho i take mine off road and do things you shouldnt be doing a car but its a civic. ill see how long this car will last me. tho its a '83 civic and i paid $200 for it! see if they are unbreakable. (my friends call em that) anyways. im sure that civic sounds like crap with there huge mufflers on the back.
Last edited by Iluvspd; 12-27-2007 at 12:12 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: 350 0.060" over
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Why Such a Difference?
That seems a bit expensive for what it is but that looks really cool.
#24
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Re: Why Such a Difference?
You don't think it was easy for him to get 1k HP out of that Honda, do you? He sure didn't get there with simple bolt-ons.
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Yeah technology vtec, I was wondering??? there is a MSD kit to advance timing inside the car by the turn of a **** is there a way to wire that to advance itself at certain rpm's??? If so a **** load of hondas will be pissin themselves soon, with my home made 305 vtec LMAO (but seriously this is worth looking into)
Also the MSD unit(s) you speak of do not advance the timing, it is an adjustable retard, usually varied by RPM or boost pressure.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Re: Why Such a Difference?
The way that everyone tends to go is with a B18 block out of something like an integra or Civic and put the Head off a CR-V on it to make it a 2.0L
the 1.8L motors are something like 1849cc and the 2.0L out of the Cr-V is something like 1951cc because of the combustion chamber.
#27
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Correct. VTEC uses oil pressure to advance or retard the exhaust cam on the earlier series VTEC motors and both cams on the newer ones.
The way that everyone tends to go is with a B18 block out of something like an integra or Civic and put the Head off a CR-V on it to make it a 2.0L
the 1.8L motors are something like 1849cc and the 2.0L out of the Cr-V is something like 1951cc because of the combustion chamber.
The way that everyone tends to go is with a B18 block out of something like an integra or Civic and put the Head off a CR-V on it to make it a 2.0L
the 1.8L motors are something like 1849cc and the 2.0L out of the Cr-V is something like 1951cc because of the combustion chamber.
You can't change the displacment of the engine by swapping heads.
Displacement is bore X stroke X # of cylinders.
Combustion chamber size has no effect on these measurements.
#29
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Lets leave the honda alone and focus on the kids camaro. We need to find out what he needs to do to improve his 3.4 or which engine to swap. So he can beat that POS 4cyl
Last edited by Iluvspd; 12-28-2007 at 02:53 PM. Reason: Wrong Answer
#30
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: Why Such a Difference?
I'm with sixshooter, sounded like you were saying you get larger displacement by installing a new head.
#31
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
But I'm leaving this thread if I wanted to talk about hondas I would stayed at hondaswap.com, I just feel this kids camaro is what we should be discussing
Last edited by Iluvspd; 12-28-2007 at 02:58 PM. Reason: THE KIDS CAMARO!
#32
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Case in point, the GM 60degreeV6, the stroke was increased from 2.99" to 3.31", to take the 2.8L to a 3.1L, and the heads are IDENTICAL.
Cam timing, is what determines valves clearance, now there is a variable that can be changed by changing stroke, piston dwell time, but that is not a direct effect, since dwell time can also be changed by changing rod length.
But I'm leaving this thread if I wanted to talk about hondas I would stayed at hondaswap.com, I just feel this kids camaro is what we should be discussing
Last edited by Six_Shooter; 12-28-2007 at 06:40 PM.
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Well, that's not entirely correct. Piston crown shape, head design, valve size and cam timing all have an effect on valve clearance (and head gasket thickness if you really want to get detailed) but given the same rod length and compression height the piston does travel further up the bore, ergo the 3.1's shorter compression height. The piston travels further upward and down in the bore.
As for making a 3.4 live at 1k hp who knows, it might be possble on a factory crank. The 3500 crank is forged and could probably put up with 1k with a little massaging and some forged sbc rods and forged pistons you've got the base for serious power. 4 bolt mains wouldn't be a bad idea either. Then all you need are some 3x00 heads and a lot of boost. Then you can blow the doors off some riceboys.
As for making a 3.4 live at 1k hp who knows, it might be possble on a factory crank. The 3500 crank is forged and could probably put up with 1k with a little massaging and some forged sbc rods and forged pistons you've got the base for serious power. 4 bolt mains wouldn't be a bad idea either. Then all you need are some 3x00 heads and a lot of boost. Then you can blow the doors off some riceboys.
#34
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why Such a Difference?
I plan on getting a 3.4 block. getting some strong pistons and connecting rods. Then either get a pair of heads off a new fwd 3.4 or port and polish the ones that come stock and the intake. Then eventually run a trubo with like 10 - 15 pounds of boost. I already have the exhaust and headers for my 3.1. I know i have to weld new ends on to the headers to get them to work with the 3.4 and i have the dual snorkel intake off a tpi motor.
#36
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Well, that's not entirely correct. Piston crown shape, head design, valve size and cam timing all have an effect on valve clearance (and head gasket thickness if you really want to get detailed) but given the same rod length and compression height the piston does travel further up the bore, ergo the 3.1's shorter compression height. The piston travels further upward and down in the bore.
The compression hight difference is a given, as the piston can't really be allowed to travel farther up the bore, at least not much when stroking an engine and has to be dealt with before hand.
The piston travels no farther up the bore (comparing 2.8 to 3.1), only farther down. Both engine share the same deck hight.
As for making a 3.4 live at 1k hp who knows, it might be possble on a factory crank. The 3500 crank is forged and could probably put up with 1k with a little massaging and some forged sbc rods and forged pistons you've got the base for serious power. 4 bolt mains wouldn't be a bad idea either. Then all you need are some 3x00 heads and a lot of boost. Then you can blow the doors off some riceboys.
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: Why Such a Difference?
The race to 1k is on! Too bad I'm not in the running, never enough money!!!
#38
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
I'm in no race either, this engine that I am building (not for the Typhony) won't be fired for a few years anyway, will take that long to research all options and get the parts made. I hope to have it in a car by 2011 or so. I still have to find the right car, and no it STILL won't be an F-body. It won't even be a domestic.
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
1k is aiming high. The fastest v6 fbody right now is making just over 800hp in a fully purpose built race car and has a 3800II TT and runs high 8's.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
Last edited by firstfirebird; 12-30-2007 at 08:23 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#40
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
1k is aiming high. The fastest v6 fbody right now is making just over 800hp in a fully purpose built race car and has a 3800II TT and runs high 8's.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
BTW the chassis I am going to use is 2450 lbs to 2780 lbs depending on the year. That means I get to add the weight where I want it and not try to remove it from where I don't want it.
The truck, which will be the tow vehicle for this car I'm only shooting for about 500 HP.
#41
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miami,fl
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 prelude si/91 camaro rs
Engine: 2.0/3.1
Transmission: D2J5/700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Why Such a Difference?
that is going to be a nice build to be pretty much a daily driver running 8's will be sick as hell
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: Why Such a Difference?
I've seen guys use sub-9 sec cars as daily drivers. Of course those were big block v8's on spray... not a huge chance of blowing parts there. Still sounds like fun to me!
#44
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Why Such a Difference?
WRONG! Increasing stroke has nothing to do with valve clearance or need for an increased combustion chamber. The increase in stroke is ALWAYS in the bottom of the cylinder. The top of the piston ALWAYS, stops at the same point at the top of the cylinder, or within a few thousanths anyway since this is one variable that can't change.
Case in point, the GM 60degreeV6, the stroke was increased from 2.99" to 3.31", to take the 2.8L to a 3.1L, and the heads are IDENTICAL.
Cam timing, is what determines valves clearance, now there is a variable that can be changed by changing stroke, piston dwell time, but that is not a direct effect, since dwell time can also be changed by changing rod length.
That's your call, and in a round about way we are discussing the Camaro, or any car for that matter, as many things are very similar between all engines.
Case in point, the GM 60degreeV6, the stroke was increased from 2.99" to 3.31", to take the 2.8L to a 3.1L, and the heads are IDENTICAL.
Cam timing, is what determines valves clearance, now there is a variable that can be changed by changing stroke, piston dwell time, but that is not a direct effect, since dwell time can also be changed by changing rod length.
That's your call, and in a round about way we are discussing the Camaro, or any car for that matter, as many things are very similar between all engines.
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Read a little more> http://www.centuryperformance.com/piston2valve.asp
You have to remember when stroking a motor, either the rod length or the wrist pin height has to change as well. When we are talking about using the same block to make two different volumes, both being from the same mfgr - one would have to assume that the clearances have already been worked out.
A good example of this is when a 383 stroker is made from a 350. When this was first being done, the best and cheapest option (I'm talking before there were "stroker kits") Ford rods were used to maintain the deck height.
The piston ALWAYS has to be at or near the deck height regardless of the stroke. This means that unless you allow the piston to protrude from the top of the block, then proper valvetrain geometry remains.
#46
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Read a little more> http://www.centuryperformance.com/piston2valve.asp
Did you read that?
No where in there did I see mention of a change in stroke effecting valve to piston clearance.
As I already stated, any change in piston to valve clearance is not a constant when it comes to stroking an engine. A change in piston dwell time at TDC, can be effected by changing the rod length as well, which using the same stroke would require a new piston with a different compression hight, so that the piston still stops at the same point at the top of the cylinder. The TDC point in relation to the deck surface is something that can't change by a whole lot, [i]maybe by about .010" in an engine using the same the head gaskets and heads. If you change the thickness of the headgasket, you could change the TDC point of the piston if you wanted, but that's yet another variable thrown into the mix.
In short stroke alone does not effect piston to valve clearance, there are other variables that have a much more intwined relationship to this.
#47
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why Such a Difference?
I found a pair of clyinder heads off of a 1996 buick regal with a 3.1. Its front wheel drive so i was just wondering if those are the heads that will flow much better than the stock 3.4 camaro heads.
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Why Such a Difference?
EDIT: I have a bunch of 3400/3100 big port and 3500 top ends if anybody is looking.
#49
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Why Such a Difference?
1k is aiming high. The fastest v6 fbody right now is making just over 800hp in a fully purpose built race car and has a 3800II TT and runs high 8's.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
The record Honda's still in FWD configuration just broke into the 8's and the RWD Honda conversion record just made 8's. Both cars have about 1k HP and absolutely CANNOT drive on the street, so I call BS on a local driving one around. Both are drag-slicked, wheelie bar'd, alcohol running cars with chutes and skinnies.
Heck, even the 9.5 second "TCVR6" Jetta locally isn't street legal.
----------
EDIT: The goal for the Firebird is 250hp N/A minimum and 500hp with boost on a 660 (and stcok 3.4 crank).
And the rods are already forged in a 660.
#50
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why Such a Difference?
Im Gonna use a 3.4 block out of a camaro or firebird. I was planning on getting those heads and porting and polishing them. The junk yard only wants $75 for each and there supposenly they only have 65k miles on them. Would that flow as good as the 2000 and up models? How much would you want for those big port clyinder heads? Im also looking for a really cheap pair of junky clyinder heads to practice port and polishing on.