Digital Camera Question
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Digital Camera Question
Im looking at getting a digital camera to snap some high quality shots of my car and other peoples cars....
In all seriousness....I need assistance please. I saw one at best buy that was a Kodak DX4330 with a 3.1 megapixel and even had a movie recorder on it.
http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=...cat=83&scat=84
I have a Kodak DC....something. (actually its my dad's thats why im looking for my own) All my digital pics on my website and even the ones I post on here are from that camera and are excellent quality. I would only think that the DX4330 would be better. Im looking to get a good camera for my business.
on a side note....
Are these digital cameras with the video worth anything? I mean are the quaility of the videos any good? I don't plan on using it for a video recorder just maybe taking some quick videos for my website and such.
Any comments or recommendations?
here's the camera...
In all seriousness....I need assistance please. I saw one at best buy that was a Kodak DX4330 with a 3.1 megapixel and even had a movie recorder on it.
http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=...cat=83&scat=84
I have a Kodak DC....something. (actually its my dad's thats why im looking for my own) All my digital pics on my website and even the ones I post on here are from that camera and are excellent quality. I would only think that the DX4330 would be better. Im looking to get a good camera for my business.
on a side note....
Are these digital cameras with the video worth anything? I mean are the quaility of the videos any good? I don't plan on using it for a video recorder just maybe taking some quick videos for my website and such.
Any comments or recommendations?
here's the camera...
Last edited by billsfirebird; Nov 1, 2002 at 11:52 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Tx
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 355TPI 380hp
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r w/ Transgo Shift Kit
I just bought my camera last weekend and got the sony 3.1 megapixel, the pictures are great but as far as the video, none of mine have come out very well, and no sound. I would say if you want one that does a half-a$$ good job on video, you may need to spend a little more.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Originally posted by jgifford
I just bought my camera last weekend and got the sony 3.1 megapixel, the pictures are great but as far as the video, none of mine have come out very well, and no sound. I would say if you want one that does a half-a$$ good job on video, you may need to spend a little more.
Jeremy
I just bought my camera last weekend and got the sony 3.1 megapixel, the pictures are great but as far as the video, none of mine have come out very well, and no sound. I would say if you want one that does a half-a$$ good job on video, you may need to spend a little more.
Jeremy
this one says it has sound....im not too interested in that anyway....how big of a picture did your 3.1 take?
The pics for a 3.1 MP will be very good, but the video quality may not be what you expect. I would probably stick to just the still pics rather that spend the extra cash on a video mode. But the camera you are look at should take very good shots considering mine is only 2.3MP and takes very good high quality shots. Plus you should get the docking station with Kodak (i think). You will probably want some more memory as well. I got the extra 64mg card and can take 69 highest quality shots or 900+ low quality, which is still good but no where near the best.
Fredel
Fredel
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Anything above 2MP is a waste if you want it for internet use.
Most of the time those digicams taht take video take low res shots that will be tiny on the screen , but it is handy.
However, I found a device that you can transfer VHS tapes onto the computer if you have a vhs camcorder, and it is only $60 or so.
Most of the time those digicams taht take video take low res shots that will be tiny on the screen , but it is handy.
However, I found a device that you can transfer VHS tapes onto the computer if you have a vhs camcorder, and it is only $60 or so.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Originally posted by Knight350
The pics for a 3.1 MP will be very good, but the video quality may not be what you expect. I would probably stick to just the still pics rather that spend the extra cash on a video mode. But the camera you are look at should take very good shots considering mine is only 2.3MP and takes very good high quality shots. Plus you should get the docking station with Kodak (i think). You will probably want some more memory as well. I got the extra 64mg card and can take 69 highest quality shots or 900+ low quality, which is still good but no where near the best.
Fredel
The pics for a 3.1 MP will be very good, but the video quality may not be what you expect. I would probably stick to just the still pics rather that spend the extra cash on a video mode. But the camera you are look at should take very good shots considering mine is only 2.3MP and takes very good high quality shots. Plus you should get the docking station with Kodak (i think). You will probably want some more memory as well. I got the extra 64mg card and can take 69 highest quality shots or 900+ low quality, which is still good but no where near the best.
Fredel
sounds as if I should go one model lower then. I really don't need the video. but this DX4330 has different snapshot features than the model below it. I guess I'll just have to weigh what I need to what I want.
So far I am very pleased with Kodak. I haven't really looked into other brands.
Whats up with the docking station. What is it for?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
Anything above 2MP is a waste if you want it for internet use.
Most of the time those digicams taht take video take low res shots that will be tiny on the screen , but it is handy.
However, I found a device that you can transfer VHS tapes onto the computer if you have a vhs camcorder, and it is only $60 or so.
Anything above 2MP is a waste if you want it for internet use.
Most of the time those digicams taht take video take low res shots that will be tiny on the screen , but it is handy.
However, I found a device that you can transfer VHS tapes onto the computer if you have a vhs camcorder, and it is only $60 or so.
Im not using it just for internet. I will be using it for print too.
bill.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by billsfirebird
Im not using it just for internet. I will be using it for print too.
bill.
Im not using it just for internet. I will be using it for print too.
bill.
My GFs 2.1MP camera printed out a nice 8x10 quality print thru her photo printer.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
Then if you're lookin for 35mm quality, don't go below 3MP.
My GFs 2.1MP camera printed out a nice 8x10 quality print thru her photo printer.
Then if you're lookin for 35mm quality, don't go below 3MP.
My GFs 2.1MP camera printed out a nice 8x10 quality print thru her photo printer.
thanks for all the imput!! I really appreciate it. Im looking to pick up a digital camera this weekend.
later,
bill
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: boonton, NJ
Car: 84 camaro Z28
Engine: 434sbc
Transmission: powerglide
Axle/Gears: moser 9" with 411 posi
if you see one at best buy made by hulet packard (spelling) get that. i have that one it was $170 and its pretty good quality.
Mark's right about 35mm quality.. at least 3MP should be good.
The docking station is for the recharge and for easier loading of the pictures to the computer. Instead of using a separate battery charger and the usb connection to the computer.. plus it looks better!!
Let us know which one you get..
Fredel
Check out the shot my HP 318 2.3MP camera took, and this is reduced size of the actual shot! Your new 3MP camera should be amazing!!
The docking station is for the recharge and for easier loading of the pictures to the computer. Instead of using a separate battery charger and the usb connection to the computer.. plus it looks better!!
Let us know which one you get..
Fredel
Check out the shot my HP 318 2.3MP camera took, and this is reduced size of the actual shot! Your new 3MP camera should be amazing!!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: northeast ohio
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
http://robertg.netfirms.com/newpic/camaro4.jpg
taken with a nikon coolpix 2000, 2 megapixels.
it will take a maximum of 1600x1200 or so. i leave mine set at 1024x768 at the highest quality setting, i can squeeze approximately 30 photos on a 16 meg card.
i paid $263.11 after tax from a local camera store.
www.nikon.com
taken with a nikon coolpix 2000, 2 megapixels.
it will take a maximum of 1600x1200 or so. i leave mine set at 1024x768 at the highest quality setting, i can squeeze approximately 30 photos on a 16 meg card.
i paid $263.11 after tax from a local camera store.
www.nikon.com
I have a kodak DX3500 (2.2mega pixel 3X digital zoom) and I love the camera. The only thing I wish it had was an optical zoom, when I use the digital zoom it sometimes blurs the pictures when I download them to my computer. I payed 170 for the camera and a 32mb card.
Matt
Matt
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I've got the Kodak DX3600 camera. Its pretty bad in low light situations, but works well in day light.
Here's a pic of my sisters cat with some dramatic lighting. ^_^

Here's a pic of my sisters cat with some dramatic lighting. ^_^

Last edited by FruityOne; Nov 2, 2002 at 05:39 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Austria
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Car: 89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 - Demon 525
Transmission: 700R4
Damn thats a clean pic.
but
<font color=red size=8>GO HERE!</font>
www.etronics.com
You will find the lowest price there.
but
<font color=red size=8>GO HERE!</font>
www.etronics.com
You will find the lowest price there.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I took this pic with a Sony DSC-P51. its 2MP and I am very happy with it. I only use it to keep pictures on my computer. If the pic looks fuzzy its because I'm still trying to work all the settings.
i just bought a new digital camera after using a friends, its a canon a40 and i am very happy with it. there is sound with the videos and it is extremely easy to use. its 2.0 mp and it has 7.5x zoom. i think i paid 299.00 for it it might be cheaper now though
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 9OFirebirdV6
I work at best buy in the repair dept. I personally wouldnt get the kodak just cause ive seen them broken so much. Id go with the Sony, or the Nikon.
I work at best buy in the repair dept. I personally wouldnt get the kodak just cause ive seen them broken so much. Id go with the Sony, or the Nikon.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 49
From: Naperville, IL
Car: 89 Iroc Hardtop
Engine: LB9 w/G92 Pkg
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt, 3.45
I like that idea for a digital camera test... show us your sister's kitty. If she doesn't have a cat, then...
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by Firebird 383
I like that idea for a digital camera test... show us your sister's kitty. If she doesn't have a cat, then...
I like that idea for a digital camera test... show us your sister's kitty. If she doesn't have a cat, then...
I bet he woke up that cat because the cat looks pre-poised.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I think I can do one better. ^_^ I was getting on the highway this morning in my little 88hp escort. The car in front of my was a Yellow Challenger. So I decided to see if he'd open it up. I got him to and I kept with him and used the camera to take a snapshot of his car when I was side by side with him. This was right before he took off because theres no way my escort could keep with him. ^_^
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
I finally got the Kodak camera for Christmas! As soon as I get a good chance I will be getting some shots with it and even trying to get a video of my Firebird too! The camera has a audio/video feature. I can shoot up to a minutes worth of video on the standard 16MB internal memory card.
I love it!
I love it!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilotrick50
Interior Parts for Sale
1
Sep 2, 2015 12:48 PM
TA8487
Interior Parts Wanted
3
Aug 23, 2015 01:34 PM
tartagliaz28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Aug 15, 2015 10:59 AM




