295/50/16 BFG radial T/A

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 27, 2004 | 10:30 PM

llvll4l2c91350

Thread Starter

Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 2,067

Likes: 1

295/50/16 BFG radial T/A

found it at tirerack. would this tire be safe to use with stock 16" rims on the back of our cars without any rubbing? i know its impossible to put 'em in the front. also why does it only cost about 100 bucks. also if anyone's using it i'd like to see a pic of how it looks from the back.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....omCompare1=yes

TIA

Feb 27, 2004 | 10:36 PM

llvll4l2c91350

Thread Starter

Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 2,067

Likes: 1

nevermind i jus realized they are taller and probaby wont work with my lowered car. think i will go with 255's instead.

Feb 27, 2004 | 10:45 PM

Kontrax

Banned

Joined: Dec 2002

Posts: 828

Likes: 1

From: Moving to non emission state

Car: 86 Camaro

Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power

Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox

i have a 295 on my rears and they work great. im using a 15 inch wheel though... never seen a 295 on a 16

Feb 28, 2004 | 02:18 AM

Orinackra

Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 1,374

Likes: 2

From: Pittsburgh, PA

Car: 06 SRM M6 GTO, 98 Grand Prix GTP

I used to run 225/70-15's on my car, which are 3/10's of an inch taller than thse 295's, and height wise I could barely stick my hand in between the top of the tire and the fenderwell. Theres no way that will wrk on a lowered car. That'd be pretty cool if you could though.