Are the 91-92 valances any deeper/longer than the 86-90 valances? I can't really see any difference if there is any in pictures...so I was just wondering.

 

valances...how so do you mean by deeper?

 

By deeper I mean longer in vertical direction.

I better edit it to make more sense.

 

Off topic and you may have answered it elsewere, but... Why does your wheel look pushed back in your sig pic? Sorry it was bugging me . I think it is a little lower since when other members have swapped older for newer it looked as if they lowered their cars a bit. Later, b-man.

 

The wheel is just turned. I was going to photoshop it but just left it the way it was.

 

ok I found a few differences out besides the scoops, it wasn't really my original question of this post but here's what I figured out...and I'm sure some of you already knew.

1. 91-92 gfx are flared out slightly more all around. Most noticable in front and rear.

2. 91-92 gfx are also rounded slightly more at the bottom.

3. 91-92 gfx are shaped more to the contour of the wheels, most noticable right behind the front wheels.

 

i think you would have gotten a quicker responses asking what the differences where between the gfx's.

there is a huge difference overall in the appearance in points that you showed and beyond. they are also held on in more places, the rear bumper itself is different on the aero package (91-92) to accomodated the lower rear side sections. the sides are definately alot lower and the front tapers to meet this.

you can "lower" the looks of your car just by putting on the 91-92 gfx.