i just had one put on my 89 rs and am wondering where should the hole be cut and how big should the hole be under the hood now.

 

well personally, i have seen this and i hate it. i know exaclty which cowl your talking about because i have it on my 79 vette. i love it on a curvy car like that but on a boxy car like a 3rdgen, i hate it. but its my opinion, and i doubt i live anywhere near you so if you like it do it.

------------------
1985 WS6 Trans AM
T-tops
bone stock sloth of an engine LG4
T-5 tranny. thank god, i couldnt stand an LG4 auto.
Plans for an LT-1 or LT-4,
dual flowmaster exaust,
& a pounding stereo.
mods right now include a radar detector.

 

85ws6TA, what do you mean you are glad you dotn have an automatic LG4? Wahts wrong with an automatic?

 

DOES anyone have any pics of an L 88 hood on a camaro third gen

------------------
1987 BLUE IROC
IT'S A DOG
BUT IT'S MY DOG
AND IT HAS A NASTY BITE......
http://members.fbody.com/cnyfbodies/tonyrusso.jpg

 

a volvo is boxy..a 89 camaro has plenty of curves..[must be different in the usa i guess] AND I LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!

 

well BuddyLeeX, a stock auto will always be less powerful than a stock manual because the torque converter robs the rear wheels of horse power. that and you have less control over the driveline of your car. Autos a defineatly not bad if they are built better than stock. My vette has an auto, but its got an upgraded stall converter and a B&M shift kit. but i would still get more power to the wheels if it had a manual. if you get a chance, drive an auto 3rdgen, and then drive the same model and year 3rdgen manual, and you will see what im talkin 'bout

lol, and a Volovo is a fridge.
a 3rdgen is boxy.
------------------
1985 WS6 Trans AM
T-tops
bone stock sloth of an engine LG4
T-5 tranny. thank god, i couldnt stand an LG4 auto.
Plans for an LT-1 or LT-4,
dual flowmaster exaust,
& a pounding stereo.
mods right now include a radar detector.

[This message has been edited by 85ws6TA (edited February 10, 2001).]