Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

COTM category suggestion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 11:42 AM
  #1  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
COTM category suggestion

I haven't seen one, maybe you've already done it (if so I'd like to see the link!)
But a back from the dead would be awesome. Either a restoration from junkyard or from junkyard to nice and clean. Maybe nobody else cares, but these should be showcased as more and more need to be done.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 03:16 PM
  #2  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 811
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: COTM category suggestion

This month Ron U.S.M.C will be a nominee with an excellent car pretty much saved from the crusher from what ive read.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 03:17 PM
  #3  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 811
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: COTM category suggestion


Couldn't tell it now!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 03:27 PM
  #4  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

More of a difference thread as opposed to end result.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 08:57 PM
  #5  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

Sort of like this?




Picked from an impound yard in Virginia with a blown V6. Destined for the scrapyard if I hadn't.




Stripped of the drive train (and other bits) and on it's way to the shop.




As it sat in the spring of 2012.




As it sits today. Two steps forward, one step back most of the time.

Here's hoping 2017 is better. A solid 40 footer though.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 10:33 PM
  #6  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Sort of. More dramatic though.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2017 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

I know what you're saying. While this car was disassembled, cleaned and painted (underneath and engine bay) and then reassembled with a better parts all around, it wasn't wrapped around a pole or salvaged from a big pile of rust. The top-side, which is what caught my attention, although being a 3/4 repaint (no roof, hood or rear deck paint) it still carries that paint job today. That's going on almost 10 years. That's also the reason it would never make it to COTM. It's hardly in a "highly finished state" as is the prerequisite for entry into the contest.
Still, it's a good example of starting with almost nothing and building it up. The engine and trans, both since replaced, were transplanted from the 86 IROC I had. The rest is all new.
It'll be interesting to see what your thread turns up.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2017 | 11:23 AM
  #8  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

while opening this thread, i was all, "dont say project of the month - dont say project of the month, dont say project of the month..."

Thanks, Vanilla Ice. that isn't a bad idea. i see no reason not to use that at some point. but as you said, it would be more of a cool idea for a thread/category, than a way to get a different outcome - as a fair percentage of COTM nominees and winners have been Rags to Riches stories.

thanks again for the input. good idea, and seems like it would be a fun month with some compelling stories.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2017 | 03:45 PM
  #9  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Linson
as a fair percentage of COTM nominees and winners have been Rags to Riches stories.
I know there have been some, but I like to see ones that aren't in perfect shape or showy or low mileage. Seems too cookie cutter. And as you said the compelling stories are far cooler to me than "I found this nice car and kept it nice."
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 11:42 AM
  #10  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Vanilla Ice
... but I like to see ones that aren't in perfect shape or showy or low mileage.
Therein lies the rub Vanilla. The COTM is supposed to be a showcase of the finest thirdgens these pages can produce. To show the scars and warts of the typical everyday example would , in a way, "tarnish the brand" and that has been discussed ad nauseum.
It seems our best opportunity to get a look at the more typical thirdgen is to look through the pages of members rides as there's no forum for (dare I say) projects.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 11:59 AM
  #11  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Meh, boring.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

I can relate. Personally I like to see the build process and don't really much care if the result is super shiny. I'm looking for results. And ideas.
As for the current COTM format, it seems to be doing well enough and it certainly does produce some excellent specimens.
I'm waiting for the calendar....
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 12:31 PM
  #13  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Anybody can create a thread around here, don't be so helpless. Just don't expect it to go on the front page.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 01:53 PM
  #14  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

I think that the point Vanilla is making is that, in fact, some of the most elite examples of high end builds and restorations were once destined for the crusher.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2017 | 05:14 PM
  #15  
jharrison5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 54
From: Lincoln, NE.
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 Vortec w/ factory TPI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 Posi
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Linson
I think that the point Vanilla is making is that, in fact, some of the most elite examples of high end builds and restorations were once destined for the crusher.
Or barn finds like mine!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2017 | 12:05 PM
  #16  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

I think this is an opportunity for a new thread. "Rags to Riches" or something like that.
At the very least, it may produce some specimens to be considered for COTM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2017 | 12:57 PM
  #17  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Here is your thread....

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...ml#post6111476

Now, where did I put that EASY button I had laying around here?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2017 | 04:16 PM
  #18  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by QwkTrip
Here is your thread....

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...ml#post6111476

Now, where did I put that EASY button I had laying around here?
There's no formatting, it's destined to go nowhere.

If it's to be anything, the idea needs is its own subforum. Not a thread.
A collection of project threads is about the only way if nobody cares to have a single month dedicated to the idea in COTM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2017 | 04:42 PM
  #19  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: COTM category suggestion

I'll say this. .....a forum with nothing but rags to riches/projects would be cool. Of course as 95% of our cars ARE projects, going from "x" condition to "Y" condition as we improve them, there would have to be criteria. ...and where do you draw the line? Sure, a car destined for the crusher and restored to a national show winner is obvious. Hundreds of pics, mods, comments, videos, etc. etc. But what if you only took your crush worthy car to a running weekend racer, but she ain't too pretty? ....or what it your show winner was actually pretty good to begin with? ...or what if your project DID go from a "1" to a "10", but you only have 5 or 6 pics with little info?

Ultimately the threads you request ARE out there.....and if they're not, well then they're not going to make it into COTM anyway, because no one knows about them in the first place. I think the desire to read these threads is a lot different than the practicality of consolidating them into a forum, or COTM sub-category. I think builds like what we're discussing are AWESOME. ....but when you go to a car-show, that's not what wins. ...and COTM is essentially a car show.

Deja-vu......didn't we all just have this convo last month???
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2017 | 06:53 PM
  #20  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

The subforum wouldn't need formatting. A thread does otherwise it's a mess.
A Chronicles forum would be a place where you introduce your car as it was os is at purchase and update it with ...updates. That's all that would need to be.

My Restomod thread is a poor example but it's where I'm chronicling my own. There are far better build threads that would belong there.

The COTM could showcase the best of such a forum. Which is what I'd like to see.

Last edited by Vanilla Ice; Feb 13, 2017 at 07:10 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 01:07 AM
  #21  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

Look...
Having a "Rags to Biches" COTM criteria one of these months isn't a problem in and of itself.
However...a "Chronicles" sub forum? That seems kinda like what the "Members' Camaros" and "Members' Firebirds" sub forums are for. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 09:08 AM
  #22  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Look, I'm only replying to people. I'm not pushing anything and if anything have lost interest in the whole thing.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 10:32 AM
  #23  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: COTM category suggestion

...a "Chronicles" sub forum? That seems kinda like what the "Members' Camaros" and "Members' Firebirds" sub forums are for. Just my opinion.
I agree...however those forums have become nothing much more than brand specific A&D forums. -meaning there's so much junk posted. I think we need to fine tune those forums or get rid of them. ...getting into a broader topic, I know.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 10:41 AM
  #24  
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 47
From: ARIZONA
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Abubaca
I agree...however those forums have become nothing much more than brand specific A&D forums. -meaning there's so much junk posted. I think we need to fine tune those forums or get rid of them. ...getting into a broader topic, I know.
Here's what I'd do:
Pull them out of appearance section, Combine them, give it it's own actual forum category, force a tag on each post for either Camaro or Firebird (Like the for sale section with states) and say it's the forum where you talk about and post pictures of your car/project.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 02:48 PM
  #25  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: COTM category suggestion

I've floated a similar idea in the Moderator forum. We'll see if it gains traction.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 06:52 PM
  #26  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Vanilla Ice
There's no formatting, it's destined to go nowhere.
Originally Posted by Vanilla Ice
Look, I'm only replying to people. I'm not pushing anything and if anything have lost interest in the whole thing.
You big grump.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 09:34 AM
  #27  
morrow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 865
Likes: 15
From: simi valley, southern cali
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: COTM category suggestion

I vote fore a performance/track car theme
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 11:23 PM
  #28  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by morrow
I vote for a performance/track car theme
That has my vote. And even if it has been done before ( and I think it may have), I think it would still hold up for a second go around.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2017 | 09:57 PM
  #29  
morrow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 865
Likes: 15
From: simi valley, southern cali
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by skinny z
That has my vote. And even if it has been done before ( and I think it may have), I think it would still hold up for a second go around.
Agreed lol but I can't remember when that was done though. I think it would be awesome to do a track car, high performance driving car.. pro touring, grand touring would be very cool
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 01:28 AM
  #30  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

^ it HAS been done. Unfortunately, each time it's been done, it has generated very limited nominations (two or three) and (seemingly) limited interest by those who were nominated.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 01:00 PM
  #31  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Performance cars can be nominated any time you want. Within the last few months I have nominated a pro tour car and an 8 second drag car.

Why are some people so interested in constraining the category to limit entrants? Is it because they don't see a path to victory otherwise?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2017 | 11:13 PM
  #32  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,919
Likes: 885
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: COTM category suggestion

Some here, despite having interesting, well executed examples of the third gen platform simply don't care about COTM. Their interest isn't in recognition or publicity but rather the hobby itself. Driving and wrenching is what motivates them.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 12:42 AM
  #33  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Yes, that is true. I saw Linson's call for participation and that is what drew me in. Until then I never paid any attention to COTM or even the Appearance forum for that matter.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 11:29 AM
  #34  
Croz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by skinny z
Therein lies the rub Vanilla. The COTM is supposed to be a showcase of the finest thirdgens these pages can produce. To show the scars and warts of the typical everyday example would , in a way, "tarnish the brand" and that has been discussed ad nauseum.
It seems our best opportunity to get a look at the more typical thirdgen is to look through the pages of members rides as there's no forum for (dare I say) projects.
Agreed. Someone may correct me but I belive COTM is open to any type of vehicle whether it is completely original or has been highly modified. The one caveat is that the vehicle is high quality and in a completed state. To Quote Skinny: "to showcase the finest thirdgens". If someone has brought a car back "from the dead" and it is an awesome car, then it goes into COTM with a summary of the work done. If someone wants to showcase their vehicle while it is being built with pics, suggestions and ideas for others to share and learn from, then create a thread.

I see COTM as the finish line....if someone has done an extensive restoration or modification, feel that is the best their car will ever be; and they throw their hands up and yell "finished!!!", that's when their car goes into COTM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 10:39 AM
  #35  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: COTM category suggestion

There needs to be separation for COTM between stock cars (as a less than X modifications) and modified. We have too many members with real cars, that have real build threads that get tens of thousands of views that really attract attention lose to stock, maintained cars.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 12:18 PM
  #36  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
25 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,431
Likes: 2,093
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: COTM category suggestion

Apparently you're not happy with who wins. Sometimes I look at the voting and think to myself, "What the heck?!" But hey, such is the nature of finding out what appeals to other people.

Personally, I think being nominated and doing the write ups is the fun part of the process. Getting the most votes isn't as big a deal as you might think. I don't even remember who won 2 months ago, but I do remember the pictures and write ups.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 01:09 PM
  #37  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Tibo
There needs to be separation for COTM between stock cars (as a less than X modifications) and modified. We have too many members with real cars, that have real build threads that get tens of thousands of views that really attract attention lose to stock, maintained cars.
* It IS an imperfect system.

* Sometimes it plays out like more of a popularity contest than a "best/baddest car" contest. I personally do not always agree with the outcome.

* However, statistically, the voters nominate and elect a good balance of stock and modified cars which is beneficial to COTM. Even turbo charged LSX's with 315s out back gets old after a while. I've had to make the same point to someone complaining that "everyone votes for the 'flashy modified cars'. If you look at the COTM Winner's list, you'll see that it is quite well balanced. https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...ners-list.html. If anything, the most under-represented group would be "mildly modified cars" - those that are on the spectrum BETWEEN highly engineered LSX conversion and bone stock time capsule.

*Like you, I too like the modified cars that keep our beloved Third Gen platform on the leading edge of performance along with the modern, 500 factory horsepower, two ton '60s design ripoffs. "Hotrodding" now as in the past, in my opinion, is what keeps these cars and this hobby moving forward. That being said, take a look at this month's bone stock COTM winner: NO MODIFICATIONS NEEDED. That's a great car.

* I'm not here to "defend the COTM program". I am, if nothing else, a straight shooter - and I tend to agree with you that the "Bone Stock Cars" might be slightly over-represented at times, due to the popularity of certain members with the COTM faithful. Don't like it? We're here every month. Tell your friends to come and check us out - and cast a vote.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 01:34 PM
  #38  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Linson
* It IS an imperfect system.

* Sometimes it plays out like more of a popularity contest than a "best/baddest car" contest. I personally do not always agree with the outcome.


Originally Posted by Linson
* It IS an imperfect system.

* However, statistically, the voters nominate and elect a good balance of stock and modified cars which is beneficial to COTM.


Originally Posted by Linson
I've had to make the same point to someone complaining that "everyone votes for the 'flashy modified cars'.


Originally Posted by Linson
*
* I am, if nothing else, a straight shooter - and I tend to agree with you that the "Bone Stock Cars" might be slightly over-represented at times, due to the popularity of certain members with the COTM faithful.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 03:54 PM
  #39  
brianlibby791's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 108
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, New Jersey
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L 350 TPI (Deleted Cats)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Original 3.27
Re: COTM category suggestion

Kill me for saying this and someone getting offended which i feel someone highly will. But you all sound like a bunch of crying liberals with this complaining about who wins COTM. Get over it, not as many people like your 3rd gen as they like the other. And i see quite a mix of stock 3rd gens and modified 3rd gens on here. Also, if you really wanna be noticed that bad on the forum then be more active. Sorry if I offended anyone
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 04:13 PM
  #40  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Croz
Agreed. Someone may correct me but I belive COTM is open to any type of vehicle whether it is completely original or has been highly modified. The one caveat is that the vehicle is high quality and in a completed state. To Quote Skinny: "to showcase the finest thirdgens". If someone has brought a car back "from the dead" and it is an awesome car, then it goes into COTM with a summary of the work done. If someone wants to showcase their vehicle while it is being built with pics, suggestions and ideas for others to share and learn from, then create a thread.

I see COTM as the finish line....if someone has done an extensive restoration or modification, feel that is the best their car will ever be; and they throw their hands up and yell "finished!!!", that's when their car goes into COTM.
rather well put.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #41  
Linson's Avatar
COTM Editor (Retired)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: COTM category suggestion

a little off-topic, but while we're on the subject of COTM...

quality is important. quality of photos is important because COTM isn't just for us - it's also, at least in theory, TGO's public face to the world. if WE don't insist that our [under appreciated] Third Gen Platform deserves to be respected and admired, then it's gonna be hard to convince the rest of the automotive enthusiast world...

I guess what I'm saying is if you want to do a photo shoot that is COTM-worthy, try taking the car someplace beyond your driveway to take some pics. it makes for a much better presentation of Third Gens.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 06:36 PM
  #42  
Croz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Re: COTM category suggestion

Originally Posted by Linson
a little off-topic, but while we're on the subject of COTM...

quality is important. quality of photos is important because COTM isn't just for us - it's also, at least in theory, TGO's public face to the world. if WE don't insist that our [under appreciated] Third Gen Platform deserves to be respected and admired, then it's gonna be hard to convince the rest of the automotive enthusiast world...

I guess what I'm saying is if you want to do a photo shoot that is COTM-worthy, try taking the car someplace beyond your driveway to take some pics. it makes for a much better presentation of Third Gens.
agreed, if you want people to put in the effort to vote, then put the effort in to make your car look as good as it can, plus it can be fun finding unique places to take pics.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.