Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 905
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
This is my first time installing equipment modern enough to have a built in crossover! We just didn't use to worry about such things. 
New amplifier with built in crossover. Crossover offers three settings: flat (crossover off), 90Hz and 60Hz.
The Infinity 4x6 component speakers are rated to reproduce sound down to 72Hz.
So which is worse...choosing 90Hz and losing some bottom end reproduction (but perhaps saving the speakers), or taking your chances on speaker damage and getting all of the low frequency response you can out of the speakers?
FYI: The car has the UQ7 factory sub-woofers, so they will help fill in on the bottom end some.

New amplifier with built in crossover. Crossover offers three settings: flat (crossover off), 90Hz and 60Hz.
The Infinity 4x6 component speakers are rated to reproduce sound down to 72Hz.
So which is worse...choosing 90Hz and losing some bottom end reproduction (but perhaps saving the speakers), or taking your chances on speaker damage and getting all of the low frequency response you can out of the speakers?
FYI: The car has the UQ7 factory sub-woofers, so they will help fill in on the bottom end some.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 326
Likes: 1
From: SLC, UT
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Re: Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
I personally run my cut off frequency for the 4X6s on the higher end(90Hz in your case).
I don't really notice any difference in additional low frequencey sound if I try to get my 4X6s to produce anything lower, and the possibility of distortion(and subsequent speaker damage) is increased when trying to have the 4x6s reproduce lower frequencies.
I don't really notice any difference in additional low frequencey sound if I try to get my 4X6s to produce anything lower, and the possibility of distortion(and subsequent speaker damage) is increased when trying to have the 4x6s reproduce lower frequencies.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 905
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
Thanks Zane M. That seemed like the safer answer.
Everyone agreeing with this?
Everyone agreeing with this?
Re: Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
Are you certain that's not a low pass crossover? In other words, it allows 60hz or 90hz AND BELOW. What's the brand and model of the amp?
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 905
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
http://www.crutchfield.com/p_020XC14...on-XC1410.html
It says high pass, but I appreciate your asking. As I mentioned at the start, while I understand the concepts, this is new territory for me.
It says high pass, but I appreciate your asking. As I mentioned at the start, while I understand the concepts, this is new territory for me.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 905
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Setting crossover...which is the lesser of two evils?
Super. Thanks guys. The switch is set, and once I bury this thing in the dash, there will be no changing it!








