6 pack
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ, used to be seattle, washington
Car: 1978 Chevrolet C10
Engine: 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
6 pack
on my new engine i was thinking of puting on the edelbrock intake and put on 3 2 barrel carbs, like 3 webbers or something of that sort, what do you guys think, or should i just go with the good ol 4 barrel holly street advenger??
Member



Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 15
From: Washington State
Car: '84 Berlinetta
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: BTOD stage 3
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi disc
6-packs are a little more difficult to tune, and is defenitly more expencive, but is very original, and you can't beat the looks of 3 weber 2 barrels sitting on top of your engine, or sticking out of the hood. I would, if I had the cash and time to keep tuning them. From a power perspective, you might see a gain using the 6-pack over the 4-bbl, because the fuel distribution will be more even (The whole idea behind dual-quad as opposed to a large CFM carb).
Originally posted by Berlinetta00
you might see a gain using the 6-pack over the 4-bbl, because the fuel distribution will be more even (The whole idea behind dual-quad as opposed to a large CFM carb).
you might see a gain using the 6-pack over the 4-bbl, because the fuel distribution will be more even (The whole idea behind dual-quad as opposed to a large CFM carb).
FWIW, that was not the original idea behind them. It wasn't even for more cfm. Back in the day high flow needle/seat assemblies and high pressure fuel pumps weren't available. By going to several carbs you had more fuel flow area.
Needless to say that hasn't been the case for many decades now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




