Is this correct? 6E questions
Is this correct? 6E questions
Running a miniram on a 9.5 - 1 355, edlebrock 6039 heads and a crane 226/234 duration, around .500 lift flat tappet cam, injectors are 24# LT1's, chip is ARAP base
My IC is set to 24 in the chip and BLM's are right around 128 after 2k maybe a little lean but at idle and cruise below 2k they are 140ish at cruise and it stutters a bit, I'm guessing cause it's lean. Idle's great at 750 but BLM's are pegged at 160.
So I begin to study the MAF tables and diddle with them a bit. I read all the articles that I can find in my search and am still confused about a thing or 2. I fail to see in the 6E where the counts in the MAF tables are actually translated to a fuel value in any other table and what count's equal what fuel value. I'm assuming that the higher count means more fuel so lowering the gps to equal a higher count will give me more fuel for that given gps, correct?
My IC is set to 24 in the chip and BLM's are right around 128 after 2k maybe a little lean but at idle and cruise below 2k they are 140ish at cruise and it stutters a bit, I'm guessing cause it's lean. Idle's great at 750 but BLM's are pegged at 160.
So I begin to study the MAF tables and diddle with them a bit. I read all the articles that I can find in my search and am still confused about a thing or 2. I fail to see in the 6E where the counts in the MAF tables are actually translated to a fuel value in any other table and what count's equal what fuel value. I'm assuming that the higher count means more fuel so lowering the gps to equal a higher count will give me more fuel for that given gps, correct?
Ok, I guess I've just got this completely wrong here. I reread the rescaling the MAF article final answer. I get the math and scalers. It's labled as gps already in tunercat so I'm not getting what this info means to me because it seems it's a formula to convert to gps, but since i already have that as an entry? Am I making any sense
Need a bit of help understanding this. Maybe I'm just missing something. Definately confused
I lowered them a bit and the BLM's indicate leaner, so the logical thing would be to go back to what they were and raise them. I don't want to just start making changes without completely understanding the theory behind it
Need a bit of help understanding this. Maybe I'm just missing something. Definately confused
I lowered them a bit and the BLM's indicate leaner, so the logical thing would be to go back to what they were and raise them. I don't want to just start making changes without completely understanding the theory behind it
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
That's exactly what's holding me back from messing with the MAF tables. I'm still not 100% sure on the process or math.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM





