< Fuel in $88: Inj. k v/s VE??
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Santiago, CHILE
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: The famous 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
< Fuel in $88: Inj. k v/s VE??
For larger injectors I try to reduce fuel in the $88 calibration via changes in the "Injector Flow Rate" (TunerCat) and nothing. BLM remains the same. What do I need move?
- At first: Are "Injector Constant" & "Injector Flow Rate" the same?-
- If I try with the complete VE table, it's the same?
- When I move the Inj. flow rate with TunerC, I check the EPROM and I see the cells 6BD and 007 moving (Inj. flow rate and checksum).
Thanks for a little help,
Denis V.
- At first: Are "Injector Constant" & "Injector Flow Rate" the same?-
- If I try with the complete VE table, it's the same?
- When I move the Inj. flow rate with TunerC, I check the EPROM and I see the cells 6BD and 007 moving (Inj. flow rate and checksum).
Thanks for a little help,
Denis V.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: < Fuel in $88: Inj. k v/s VE??
Originally posted by Denis.V
For larger injectors I try to reduce fuel in the $88 calibration via changes in the "Injector Flow Rate" (TunerCat) and nothing. BLM remains the same. What do I need move?
- At first: Are "Injector Constant" & "Injector Flow Rate" the same?-
- If I try with the complete VE table, it's the same?
- When I move the Inj. flow rate with TunerC, I check the EPROM and I see the cells 6BD and 007 moving (Inj. flow rate and checksum).
For larger injectors I try to reduce fuel in the $88 calibration via changes in the "Injector Flow Rate" (TunerCat) and nothing. BLM remains the same. What do I need move?
- At first: Are "Injector Constant" & "Injector Flow Rate" the same?-
- If I try with the complete VE table, it's the same?
- When I move the Inj. flow rate with TunerC, I check the EPROM and I see the cells 6BD and 007 moving (Inj. flow rate and checksum).
Different math, but both at the basis of the PW calculation.
Could do it that way, but it might fubar some other calulations.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Santiago, CHILE
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: The famous 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
O.K., thanks,
I did a search about this topic. "Injector k" doesn't exist at $88 calibration. For changes in injector size you must move "Idle fueling BPC" (2 byte value @ 6BA/6BB) + "BPC for N-alpha fueling" (2 byte value @ 71F/720) + "Inj k vs EGR airflow" (table from 754 to 764). All the same %, but in the oposite way than "injector k" (down is less fuel delivery, up is more fuel).
Others says: 0% EGR airflow in the last table mentioned is "inj. BPC @ idle" but I'm testing about this.
I did a search about this topic. "Injector k" doesn't exist at $88 calibration. For changes in injector size you must move "Idle fueling BPC" (2 byte value @ 6BA/6BB) + "BPC for N-alpha fueling" (2 byte value @ 71F/720) + "Inj k vs EGR airflow" (table from 754 to 764). All the same %, but in the oposite way than "injector k" (down is less fuel delivery, up is more fuel).
Others says: 0% EGR airflow in the last table mentioned is "inj. BPC @ idle" but I'm testing about this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 25, 2015 08:05 AM
92camaroJoe
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 13, 2015 06:07 AM




