Now this is odd....
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Now this is odd....
I've got my ZT-2 outputting the Narrowband Simulated O2 reading to my ECU, but it's reading over 1 volt, according to the datalog - but the ZT-2 datalog is showing that it's running a Lambda of .82?
Lamda = output voltage, correct?
Lamda = output voltage, correct?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Brains rather foggy from a lack of sleep at the moment but it sounds like your rich from the lambda value. I dont have a WB but the lambda should be a ratio of the actual afr to that of stoich. >1 is leaner then stoich, <1 is richer.
EDIT: think I had that back assward, or it was right the first time and now its backwards.
EDIT: think I had that back assward, or it was right the first time and now its backwards.
Last edited by dimented24x7; Apr 21, 2005 at 03:18 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Now this is odd....
Originally posted by Doward
Lamda = output voltage, correct?
Lamda = output voltage, correct?
If so, no.
If you mean that the simulated output is 0ver one, and the ZT is reading an actual of .82, then that maybe possible. The simulated output only needs to transistion across .5 to make the ecm happy, and the ZT might be interupting the voltages in a conversion from it's output.
Make sense?.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post