another one trying to tune $59
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 10
From: CT
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi
another one trying to tune $59
hey guys i'm running the $59 32k bin with wideband, i have 30lb/hr injectors on my 305, i'm using the ads from nwstp.com the 2&3bar ads, the idle injector pw are around 5-6ms is something wrong with the ads? i thought i read that somewhere, i'm using a bpc of 111.00 right now, the mixture seems to be okay, i'm waiting to recieve my wideband o2, but 5-6ms doesnt sound right, also why does $58 have soo much IAC stuff, my idle is not smooth, i got it better but it's hunting about 75 RPM, i need to get this tuned for my procharger thats sitting in the box or it's back to $8D and an FMU
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
I'm pretty sure the bpc vs egr should be 138 for 30 lb injectors. it doesn't matter what the pulse width is as long as the AFR is good. you don't have the wideband yet, so... are you using the stock O2 with some sort of wideband patch? could that be messing up some readings? If your WB patch is the same I have, it doesn't change tuning, just the datalogging file includes the WB readings.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 10
From: CT
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi
the stock typhoon bin has a bpc of 130 which is for 30lb/hr injectors, i'm way rich with that setting, i used the bpc calc on moates to come up with my current value, i'm using the stock o2 sensor for the time being, i'm just focusing on my idle right now. i'm using the $59 bin off of moates, i guess it has the EGR fixed, it's upped from 16k to 32k and it has the flags to use wideband o2's which is just for the datalogs i would assume. i'll try the 130 bpc again, another question should i leave the ve vs rpm table alone and just change the values in the closed throttle ve table?
it seem to run alot better at idle by lowering the ve vs rpm from 30.86 to 20.50
it seem to run alot better at idle by lowering the ve vs rpm from 30.86 to 20.50
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
There is a bug in the ADS. I was whining about it a few months ago. The fix is to change the ADS file values. Do a search for my username and $58. The complete fix should come up.
I had a reported 5-6ms BPW at idle..that is really in the 1.5 to 2.0 ms range.
Is that $59 bin released to the public?
I had a reported 5-6ms BPW at idle..that is really in the 1.5 to 2.0 ms range.
Is that $59 bin released to the public?
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Car: 81 Turbo Trans Am
Engine: 301 T
Transmission: 200-4R
Re: another one trying to tune $59
Originally posted by 86Z
... why does $58 have soo much IAC stuff, my idle is not smooth, i got it better but it's hunting about 75 RPM...
... why does $58 have soo much IAC stuff, my idle is not smooth, i got it better but it's hunting about 75 RPM...
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Car: 81 Turbo Trans Am
Engine: 301 T
Transmission: 200-4R
Originally posted by junkcltr
Is that $59 bin released to the public?
Is that $59 bin released to the public?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 10
From: CT
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi
I don't know if this was fixed with your VE change. If not, have you tried zeroing out the idle RPM error spark tables? I know these tables have caused problems on other's vehicles, too.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 10
From: CT
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi
hey junkcltr, i found your post and got a headache from reading all that math
what exactly was the fix? i dont know how to go about adding that stuff to the ads or changing it, if we have a fixed ads file, someone should upload it to moates.net
what exactly was the fix? i dont know how to go about adding that stuff to the ads or changing it, if we have a fixed ads file, someone should upload it to moates.net Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
All the goofy math was posted because I was new to TP4.0 and didn't know what I was doing with it. I won't upload it because I didn't create the file so I don't feel I have the right to upload it. Send me a PM I will see what I can do.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Car: 81 Turbo Trans Am
Engine: 301 T
Transmission: 200-4R
Originally posted by 86Z
no the idle has not been fixed yet, are you referring to the F89 table?
no the idle has not been fixed yet, are you referring to the F89 table?
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Car: 93 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3L V6 Turbo Charged
Transmission: 4L80e
I am going through the ads and xdf on nwstp.com. I hopefully I will have those bugs worked out of them. If you see anymore like that.. please post it. We took the base one that came with Tunerpro and have been adding/fixing things that are in there. I am sure there are more. even when you put in the informachine from the ds definition file (think it is 160.ds) some of the values are still incorrect. I guess I will have to look at some logs in datamaster and compare them to what the ads says they are in tunerpro.






