Highwaymode Load vs. AFR table....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Highwaymode Load vs. AFR table....
How lean is it safeto in this table without getting in trouble with the engine?
------------------
ZaphodB a.k.a Carl Andersson - zaphodb@faxancruisers.org
'89 Camaro IROC-Z 5.7L TPI - Mods under construction :-)
Custom ARAP Chip Under Development/180 t-stat, Edelbrock TES Headers,
SLP Airfoil, K&N Filters, Accel 8mm wires, Relocated MAT, AFPR @ 45 PSI
------------------
ZaphodB a.k.a Carl Andersson - zaphodb@faxancruisers.org
'89 Camaro IROC-Z 5.7L TPI - Mods under construction :-)
Custom ARAP Chip Under Development/180 t-stat, Edelbrock TES Headers,
SLP Airfoil, K&N Filters, Accel 8mm wires, Relocated MAT, AFPR @ 45 PSI
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ZaphodB:
How lean is it safeto in this table without getting in trouble with the engine?
</font>
How lean is it safeto in this table without getting in trouble with the engine?
</font>
You'll have to do plug checks.
FWIW, rarely can you run a V8 leaner then 15.8 at cruise. But even at that you can melt the motor.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Grumpy:
Depends on your exact combo..
You'll have to do plug checks.
FWIW, rarely can you run a V8 leaner then 15.8 at cruise. But even at that you can melt the motor.</font>
Depends on your exact combo..
You'll have to do plug checks.
FWIW, rarely can you run a V8 leaner then 15.8 at cruise. But even at that you can melt the motor.</font>
Have a chip with the Highway mode A/F table now varying between 15.3 and 16, and it seems to run stable with that (16:1 that is for the lowest load level in the A/F table), and I estimated the fuel consumtion to about 1 litre / 10 kilometres with the speed varying between 30-60 mph, highway mode enable set at 50 mph...
So my conclusion is that the highway mode is something good, but should be tuned with caution.... Now that there is a new version of the Winbin .ecu file maybe some more people will be interested in looking at this too!
------------------
ZaphodB a.k.a Carl Andersson - zaphodb@faxancruisers.org
'89 Camaro IROC-Z 5.7L TPI - Mods under construction :-)
Custom ARAP Chip Under Development/180 t-stat, Edelbrock TES Headers,
SLP Airfoil, K&N Filters, Accel 8mm wires, Relocated MAT, AFPR @ 45 PSI
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
I have been runing 17.6-17.2 for a few months now with no problems. I DO have a functioning EGR which dilutes the mixture and makes the mixture less volatile than you would expect. The only thing I've noticed so far is burning less gas.
Give me another year of running this combo and I will give you a long term result. I do agree that the general condition of your motor is a major factor, especially your injectors and the EGR.
I have tried as lean as 18:1, but it was too lean for the O2 sensor to properly monitor and I noticed that my injector pulse widths on a "known piece of road" actually increased when I went this lean. I obtained the lowest injector pulse widths with 17.6-17.2 (at various KPAs).
Give me another year of running this combo and I will give you a long term result. I do agree that the general condition of your motor is a major factor, especially your injectors and the EGR.
I have tried as lean as 18:1, but it was too lean for the O2 sensor to properly monitor and I noticed that my injector pulse widths on a "known piece of road" actually increased when I went this lean. I obtained the lowest injector pulse widths with 17.6-17.2 (at various KPAs).
Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, TX
Car: Used to be an '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7l TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:23?
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA:
...snip...
I have tried as lean as 18:1, but it was too lean for the O2 sensor to properly monitor and I noticed that my injector pulse widths on a "known piece of road" actually increased when I went this lean. I obtained the lowest injector pulse widths with 17.6-17.2 (at various KPAs).</font>
...snip...
I have tried as lean as 18:1, but it was too lean for the O2 sensor to properly monitor and I noticed that my injector pulse widths on a "known piece of road" actually increased when I went this lean. I obtained the lowest injector pulse widths with 17.6-17.2 (at various KPAs).</font>
------------------
'87 IROC 5.7l TPI - original owner!
PJ, you're not off track. Like you stated the ECM does not control the air/fuel mixture based on the output of the oxygen sensor in Highway mode. The sensor is still outputting a voltage, though, that corresponds to a lean mixture. Glenn is monitoring this output to get another window into the operating condition of the engine. After tweaking the MAF scalars I now see BLMs ranging from 124 to 130 across the board so I'm just starting to play with Highway mode fuel.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM





