6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
Title pretty much says it all. This flow rate is in the upper 5th MAF table.
I'm running an L98, pretty much stock with the exception of a ZZ4 cam.
Any ideas of how I can get into MAF table 6? Am I right to assume that there's still performance left on the table if I'm stuck in MAF 5?
I'm running an L98, pretty much stock with the exception of a ZZ4 cam.
Any ideas of how I can get into MAF table 6? Am I right to assume that there's still performance left on the table if I'm stuck in MAF 5?
Last edited by 2new2funny; Sep 12, 2007 at 09:28 PM. Reason: detail
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
200 gm/sec sounds about right for a near stock L98. With more mods you should see the airflow increase.
I'm flowing about 240 gm/sec now with SR/bigmouth/Comp 503/long tubes/stock 113 heads, etc.
The cam was worth about 20 gms/sec. The SR/bigmouth combination was worth another 20 gm/sec.
I'm flowing about 240 gm/sec now with SR/bigmouth/Comp 503/long tubes/stock 113 heads, etc.
The cam was worth about 20 gms/sec. The SR/bigmouth combination was worth another 20 gm/sec.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
It is possible to re-adjust the MAF Scalar Tables to set the maximum to lower than 201 g/s on the top of Table #5 and force it to go into Table 6 if you wish to cause it to go to Tabel 6.
But, you need to also adjust to address C5DF to make sure the table lookup knows to jump out of Table 5 and go into Table 6. As well, you will need to re-adjust the C5EC (the starting point in Table 6 to match the value you set in address C5DF.
Have fun
But, you need to also adjust to address C5DF to make sure the table lookup knows to jump out of Table 5 and go into Table 6. As well, you will need to re-adjust the C5EC (the starting point in Table 6 to match the value you set in address C5DF.
Have fun
Code:
;----------------------------------------------
; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #5
;
; ARG = GMS/SEC + (256/SCALAR)
;----------------------------------------------
LC5DF: FCB 207 ; TABLE SCALAR
;
LC5E0: FCB 8 ; 8 + 1 LINE TABLE
;
; gms/sec BIN VDC #/HR
;----------------------------------
LC5E1 FCB 166 ; 134.2 1280 3.66 1036
LC5E2 FCB 176 ; 142.3 1312 3.75 1098
LC5E3 FCB 186 ; 150.4 1344 3.84 1161
LC5E4 FCB 196 ; 158.5 1376 3.93 1223
LC5E5 FCB 207 ; 167.4 1408 4.02 1292
LC5E6 FCB 219 ; 177.1 1440 4.11 1367
LC5E7 FCB 230 ; 186.0 1472 4.21 1435
LC5E8 FCB 242 ; 195.7 1504 4.30 1510
LC5E9 FCB 255 ; 206.2 1536 4.39 1591
;----------------------------------------------
;----------------------------------------------
; MASS AIR FLOW TABLE #6
;
; ARG = GMS/SEC + (256/SCALAR)
;
;----------------------------------------------
FCB 255 ; TABLE SCALAR
;
LC5EB: FCB 16 ; 16 = 1 LINES IN TABLE
;
; gms/SeC BIN VDC #/HR
;----------------------------------
LC5EC FCB 207 ; 206.2 1536 4.39 1591
LC5ED FCB 213 ; 212.2 1552 4.43 1637
LC5EE FCB 219 ; 218.1 1568 4.48 1684
LC5EF FCB 226 ; 225.1 1584 4.53 1737
LC5F0 FCB 233 ; 232.1 1600 4.57 1791
LC5F1 FCB 240 ; 239.1 1616 4.62 1845
LC5F2 FCB 248 ; 247.0 1632 4.66 1906
LC5F3 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1648 4.71 1960
LC5F4 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1664 4.75 1960
LC5F5 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1680 4.80 1960
LC5F6 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1696 4.85 1960
LC5F7 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1712 4.89 1960
LC5F8 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1728 4.94 1960
LC5F9 FCB 255 ; 254.0 1744 4.98 1960
LC5FA FCB 255 ; 254.0 1760 5.03 1960
LC5FB FCB 255 ; 254.0 1776 5.07 1960
LC5FC FCB 255 ; 254.0 1792 5.12 1960 Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Charles County, Maryland
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
Yeah the stock L98 w/ super restrictive intake, and probably low shift points, is probably not strong enough to max out the MAF. Sounds normal for that combo. I ran 2.02/1.6 heads on my 327, with an old school 0.480/0.480 cam, and the MAF was maxed out at 255 by about 5800 (I was shifting at 6300 so I had to bump the PE above 5500ish). This was with a Stealth Ram intake.
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
Thanks for the replies.
Oddly enough I only broke the 200 mark when I richened up Table 5 by 5% to get better WOT.
Before this, I was running 187. Do I assume that the tune just wasn't quite right and the increase in the g/s reading is just a function of a better tune?
I may increase the table values another 5% and see what happens...
Oddly enough I only broke the 200 mark when I richened up Table 5 by 5% to get better WOT.
Before this, I was running 187. Do I assume that the tune just wasn't quite right and the increase in the g/s reading is just a function of a better tune?
I may increase the table values another 5% and see what happens...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Charles County, Maryland
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
When you "richen" MAF tables you are basically lying to the computer about the meter's readings. The readings went up because you told them to go up. The g/sec numbers are arbitrary, and only reflecting true flow rate when calibrated vs the voltage
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: 6E only seeing 201 g/s at WOT
Thanks for the replies.
Oddly enough I only broke the 200 mark when I richened up Table 5 by 5% to get better WOT.
Before this, I was running 187. Do I assume that the tune just wasn't quite right and the increase in the g/s reading is just a function of a better tune?
I may increase the table values another 5% and see what happens...
Oddly enough I only broke the 200 mark when I richened up Table 5 by 5% to get better WOT.
Before this, I was running 187. Do I assume that the tune just wasn't quite right and the increase in the g/s reading is just a function of a better tune?
I may increase the table values another 5% and see what happens...
And as the others have already said, a "basically" stock TPI won't max the MAF at all. That is why GM wasn't concerned about the 255 gm/sec limitation of the 3rd Gen's MAF system - none of their engines at that time were close to maxing the MAF.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM






