O2 in y pipe idea
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
From: Crestwood KY
Car: 86 Transmaro, yes I'm for real do a
Engine: 383, 4 bolt block, scat crank, PM r
Transmission: t5 NWC and its holding up behind my
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt aussie, 3.73s from yukon gea
O2 in y pipe idea
ok maybe this has been posted before so forgive me. Wouldn't it be more effective to have the O2 in the singe part of the y pipe instead of it just monitoring just one bank of the engine? If you run a extra length of wire would the extra resistance from that wire effect the reading that the computer sees from the O2? I know someone knows
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 1
From: Warrington, PA USA
Car: "02 z-28
Engine: LS-1
Transmission: 4L60E
The O2 is located there because that is the spot it will get hot enough, fast enough, to get into closed loop. The newer GM cars usually use 4 heated O2 sensors further back. With a non heated sensor it relies on exhaust gas heat to get hot enough to signal. Bosch makes a universal heated sensor that you could relocate furthur back in the exhaust stream. Adding proper wire slightly longer should not affect signal voltage too much.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
From: Crestwood KY
Car: 86 Transmaro, yes I'm for real do a
Engine: 383, 4 bolt block, scat crank, PM r
Transmission: t5 NWC and its holding up behind my
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt aussie, 3.73s from yukon gea
would relocating it be more effecient?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 1
From: Warrington, PA USA
Car: "02 z-28
Engine: LS-1
Transmission: 4L60E
No, it would be more likely to be less efficient unless you use a heated sensor as I said. I have an ' 02 Camaro and they use 2 off the exhaust maifold and a pre-cat and post-cat, and they are heated. My Blazer is the same, a total of 4 sensors. A single wire sensor has to be kept at a place where the exhaust gas stays the hottest all the time, remember they must be kept at least 550 degrees to provide proper signaling.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 1982 Trans Am & 1982 Corvette
Engine: L-98 with LO-3 induction. 350 CFI
Transmission: 5 speed and vette has 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373's in T/A .. vette unknown
NUBIRD
I dont think it will be a problem, as I recall the the 82 cfi f-bodies mounted it down in the Y-pipe .... my 82 corvette has it back by the cat converter and it get into closed loop no problem
I dont think it will be a problem, as I recall the the 82 cfi f-bodies mounted it down in the Y-pipe .... my 82 corvette has it back by the cat converter and it get into closed loop no problem
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 1
From: Warrington, PA USA
Car: "02 z-28
Engine: LS-1
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by Jproz1167
NUBIRD
I dont think it will be a problem, as I recall the the 82 cfi f-bodies mounted it down in the Y-pipe .... my 82 corvette has it back by the cat converter and it get into closed loop no problem
NUBIRD
I dont think it will be a problem, as I recall the the 82 cfi f-bodies mounted it down in the Y-pipe .... my 82 corvette has it back by the cat converter and it get into closed loop no problem
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
Sep 8, 2015 03:38 PM
transaero
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Aug 31, 2015 01:14 AM




