Dyno 2000 ? reliable or not ?

Subscribe
Sep 29, 2003 | 04:12 PM
  #1  
anyone have any idea how close this is supposed to be (real life ? ) just wondering
Reply 0
Oct 2, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
Engine Analyzer is a lot better if you can afford it... its like $100 or something like that...

but it was within 5 hp and 10 ft/lbs of my buddies LT1 setup...
:lala:
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
the major thing with dyno 2000 is....as with any other dyno program you have to have all the perameters set. I put all my motors specs and it was almost exact
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2003 | 04:34 PM
  #4  
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Engine Analyzer is a lot better if you can afford it... its like $100 or something like that...
You can get it here with a special rebate.

$100- $100 rebate = $0.00

http://www.themustangshop.com/ea30.zip
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2003 | 07:15 PM
  #5  
Its good for a rough estimate. I really wish they would incorporate cylinder head runner size into the equation.
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #6  
I used mine for comparison. I figured if it was calculating wrong, at least it calculated the same everytime. Therefore comparisons between heads and cams would at least give me an idea of the power curves. I did use the correct head flow numbers (from Chev High Performance magazine) and got the cam specs from the vendors web sites.
Reply 0
Oct 23, 2003 | 12:39 AM
  #7  
DD said 420HP fly. I put 336HP to the rear wheels with that combo.
Reply 0
Oct 23, 2003 | 02:38 PM
  #8  
its fairly accurate if you put in the exact specs for every part, Even the airflow of the heads.

Alot of people just choose "High Performance Camshaft" and "Fully ported heads" and expect it to be correct.

The more info you give it, the more accurate it will be.
Reply 0
Subscribe