anyone have any idea how close this is supposed to be (real life ? ) just wondering
Supreme Member
Engine Analyzer is a lot better if you can afford it... its like $100 or something like that...
but it was within 5 hp and 10 ft/lbs of my buddies LT1 setup...
:lala:
but it was within 5 hp and 10 ft/lbs of my buddies LT1 setup...
:lala:
Junior Member
the major thing with dyno 2000 is....as with any other dyno program you have to have all the perameters set. I put all my motors specs and it was almost exact

Supreme Member
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Engine Analyzer is a lot better if you can afford it... its like $100 or something like that...
You can get it here with a special rebate.Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Engine Analyzer is a lot better if you can afford it... its like $100 or something like that...
$100- $100 rebate = $0.00
http://www.themustangshop.com/ea30.zip
Supreme Member
Its good for a rough estimate. I really wish they would incorporate cylinder head runner size into the equation.
I used mine for comparison. I figured if it was calculating wrong, at least it calculated the same everytime. Therefore comparisons between heads and cams would at least give me an idea of the power curves. I did use the correct head flow numbers (from Chev High Performance magazine) and got the cam specs from the vendors web sites.
DD said 420HP fly. I put 336HP to the rear wheels with that combo.
Banned
its fairly accurate if you put in the exact specs for every part, Even the airflow of the heads.
Alot of people just choose "High Performance Camshaft" and "Fully ported heads" and expect it to be correct.
The more info you give it, the more accurate it will be.
Alot of people just choose "High Performance Camshaft" and "Fully ported heads" and expect it to be correct.
The more info you give it, the more accurate it will be.

