I want to swap out the engine in my 1986 sport coupe Camaro. Currently it has the 2.8 v6 in it, but I was looking around and might have an opportunity to put in a 3.6 v6 from a 2015 Camaro. I have never done an engine swap before but am willing to put in lots of work, but is this even a feasable idea? I can get the transmission and ecm and stuff too, and it seems like a good way to get 335 horsepower...
aliceempire
Supreme Member
close
- Join DateNov 2008
- LocationMilwaukee
- Posts:2,106
- iTrader Positive Feedback100
- iTrader Feedback Score(14)
- Car92 Firebird, 77 Trans Am SE, 86 Z28
- Engine5.7 HSR, T/A 6.6, empty
- TransmissionT-5, TH350, T-5
- Axle/Gears3.08 posi, 3.23 posi, 3.23
- Likes:138
- Liked:181 Times in 152 Posts
Feasible, sure. But it's very likely to require quite a bit of custom fabrication. Engine mounts and headers/exhaust are the big ones. I don't think anyone makes off the shelf stuff that works for it. Not to mention fueling requirements, wiring, custom tuning, oil pan options/fit. Doable but a lot of work even for someone who has custom fabrication skills.
Personally I'd pass on it. A whole lot of work for a maligned 6 cylinder.
Personally I'd pass on it. A whole lot of work for a maligned 6 cylinder.
QwkTrip
COTM Editor
close
- Join DateMar 2001
- Posts:10,438
- iTrader Positive Feedback100
- iTrader Feedback Score(22)
- Car'89 Firebird
- Engine7.0L
- TransmissionT56
- Likes:0
- Liked:2,093 Times in 1,434 Posts
In general, the V6 cars are more advanced and complex than the V8 cars making the V6 a much more difficult swap. Engines are getting more and more integrated into the cars than they used to be, meaning you need to take more stuff from the original car to make things work. And the little things that don't work stop the whole show because of the interdependencies between sub-systems.
Some things that could make it extra difficult that you maybe want to look into before you buy anything:
* How many different ECM's are needed for engine, trans, fuel pump to work?
* Is fuel pump a PWM type (pulse wave modulation), and can you get that into your fuel tank?
* Are gauges operated via CAN (connected area network)? Your original gauges are not.
* Will the diagnostics go berzerk if it doesn't see everything the way it ought to be, and is there programming software that will allow you to fix that?
* Will the transmission fit in your teeny tiny trans tunnel? (probably not)
Some things that could make it extra difficult that you maybe want to look into before you buy anything:
* How many different ECM's are needed for engine, trans, fuel pump to work?
* Is fuel pump a PWM type (pulse wave modulation), and can you get that into your fuel tank?
* Are gauges operated via CAN (connected area network)? Your original gauges are not.
* Will the diagnostics go berzerk if it doesn't see everything the way it ought to be, and is there programming software that will allow you to fix that?
* Will the transmission fit in your teeny tiny trans tunnel? (probably not)
Hmmm.. so it wouldn't be very easy then. I'll probably pass, seeing as I just scraped together enough money to get my car as the first car I've ever owned, and have never done an engine swap before. I'll have to find some other way to make more power...
vorteciroc
Supreme Member
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- Location212 is up in this Bit@#
- Posts:2,917
- iTrader Positive Feedback0
- iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- CarResto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
- EngineAlky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
- TransmissionMy own built/ design 4L80M
- Axle/GearsCustom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
- Likes:642
- Liked:803 Times in 615 Posts
Please stay away from the Suzuki/ GM 3.6L Engine Platform.
It was literally designed from the start as a "Throw Away" Engine (Lease Vehicle/ 50,000 Mile/ Min Life Expectancy).
GM never intended that Engine to receive a "2nd Owner" Life... It was supposed to get crushed after the Lease-Period...
And it should be.
It was literally designed from the start as a "Throw Away" Engine (Lease Vehicle/ 50,000 Mile/ Min Life Expectancy).
GM never intended that Engine to receive a "2nd Owner" Life... It was supposed to get crushed after the Lease-Period...
And it should be.
Quote:
It was literally designed from the start as a "Throw Away" Engine (Lease Vehicle/ 50,000 Mile/ Min Life Expectancy).
GM never intended that Engine to receive a "2nd Owner" Life... It was supposed to get crushed after the Lease-Period...
And it should be.
Really? It is in almost everyone of their vehicles. The ones I have seen are pretty reliable too.Originally Posted by vorteciroc
Please stay away from the Suzuki/ GM 3.6L Engine Platform.It was literally designed from the start as a "Throw Away" Engine (Lease Vehicle/ 50,000 Mile/ Min Life Expectancy).
GM never intended that Engine to receive a "2nd Owner" Life... It was supposed to get crushed after the Lease-Period...
And it should be.
vorteciroc
Supreme Member
close
- Join DateJul 2006
- Location212 is up in this Bit@#
- Posts:2,917
- iTrader Positive Feedback0
- iTrader Feedback Score(0)
- CarResto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
- EngineAlky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
- TransmissionMy own built/ design 4L80M
- Axle/GearsCustom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
- Likes:642
- Liked:803 Times in 615 Posts
Quote:
Sadly Yes Really.Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
Really? It is in almost everyone of their vehicles. The ones I have seen are pretty reliable too. Just look up Acadia/ Traverse Engine Failures.





