Mandrel-Bent Performance Advantage? Survey
Mandrel-Bent Performance Advantage? Survey
Any opinions on the performance advantages of Mandrel-Bent Tubing over OEM?
Take a minute to fill out a survey at: http://www.mcs-la.com/survey.html
The results will be shared with aftermarket manufacturers and installers in an exhaust industry pub.
If you have specific thoughts not covered by the survey, I'd like to here about them.
Thanks.
Pete
Take a minute to fill out a survey at: http://www.mcs-la.com/survey.html
The results will be shared with aftermarket manufacturers and installers in an exhaust industry pub.
If you have specific thoughts not covered by the survey, I'd like to here about them.
Thanks.
Pete
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 559
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
It's nots opinion its fact. I didn't read the survey but I don't see the need to even look at it. OEM tunbing has bends and crinkles in it that create turbulence and inconsistant tubing diameter. Just pick up any science book and look at mass flow rate.
Well I looked at that survey and it is pointless. You cannot accurately answer any of those questions. All types of vehicles perform better with it and the performance numbers are based on motor specs and size.
Well I looked at that survey and it is pointless. You cannot accurately answer any of those questions. All types of vehicles perform better with it and the performance numbers are based on motor specs and size.
Shifty, you're right about the survy being inherently flawed. I may have over-simplified it to make it work for the whole industry. I'm trying to uncover trends among groups such as:
Do mfg's and editors think alike, or are the mfg's overly optimistic?
Do installers refute all the published dyno results because they can only crimp-bend inhouse and they don't like cat-backs?
Do enthusiasts tend to share views with mfg's, editors or any other group?
I hope you'll reconsider taking the survey, and feel free to skip any part that seems pointless.
Thanks.
Pete
Do mfg's and editors think alike, or are the mfg's overly optimistic?
Do installers refute all the published dyno results because they can only crimp-bend inhouse and they don't like cat-backs?
Do enthusiasts tend to share views with mfg's, editors or any other group?
I hope you'll reconsider taking the survey, and feel free to skip any part that seems pointless.
Thanks.
Pete
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 559
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by mcsla
Shifty, you're right about the survy being inherently flawed. I may have over-simplified it to make it work for the whole industry. I'm trying to uncover trends among groups such as:
Do mfg's and editors think alike, or are the mfg's overly optimistic?
Do installers refute all the published dyno results because they can only crimp-bend inhouse and they don't like cat-backs?
Do enthusiasts tend to share views with mfg's, editors or any other group?
I hope you'll reconsider taking the survey, and feel free to skip any part that seems pointless.
Thanks.
Pete
Shifty, you're right about the survy being inherently flawed. I may have over-simplified it to make it work for the whole industry. I'm trying to uncover trends among groups such as:
Do mfg's and editors think alike, or are the mfg's overly optimistic?
Do installers refute all the published dyno results because they can only crimp-bend inhouse and they don't like cat-backs?
Do enthusiasts tend to share views with mfg's, editors or any other group?
I hope you'll reconsider taking the survey, and feel free to skip any part that seems pointless.
Thanks.
Pete
For anyone interested, I've posted a running results page for the survey at http://www.mcs-la.com/results.asp
Be sure to join the survey at http://www.mcs-la.com/survey.html
Thanks for any input.
Pete
Be sure to join the survey at http://www.mcs-la.com/survey.html
Thanks for any input.
Pete
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM






