Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Catalytic question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2004 | 07:03 AM
  #1  
ThraxXx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Fuel Injection
Transmission: Automatic 4speed /w OVerdrive
Catalytic question

Just wondering something here. I noticed that after I installed the Magnaflow Cat that I am getting a hell of a lot better gas milleage. I used to barely make it 2 weeks without having to re-fuel and now I am going on a 2 and a half weeks and still my tank sits at 1/4. I haven't installed my new o2 sensor yet but I plan on getting that done. I waswondering if a cat can somehow increase gas milleage?
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Certainly. A restrictive and/or plugged up cat will hurt power and efficiency.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 01:34 AM
  #3  
AlbertaFbody's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer AB Canada
Car: 86 z28
Engine: 305 carbed with 3" Y pipe back
Transmission: 700r4 that is breaking down
but yet wouldn't a more flowing cat (free flow) make it so the engine runs better thus causeing you to use more gas?? im tired and may be thinking crooked
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #4  
ThraxXx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Fuel Injection
Transmission: Automatic 4speed /w OVerdrive
Well I had no cat on there before. It was a straight pipe from the headers back to the trunk. Litterally no back preasure whatso ever.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
With non-feedback induction systems, a freer flowing exhaust leans out the mixture ratio. Feedback systems compensate for that (to some extent, anyway - MAF is better about that an SD).

If an exhaust system is restrictive, it takes engine power to "pump" the exhaust out the system. Therefore, if you remove some of that restriction, less power is required so more of the power produced by burning fuel goes towards moving the vehicle. Therefore, more net power and less net fuel consumption under cruise conditions.

Apply the same principles to WOT operation, and a free-flowing system will use more fuel - true.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #6  
Z28GEN3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye AZ
Originally posted by five7kid
If an exhaust system is restrictive, it takes engine power to "pump" the exhaust out the system. Therefore, if you remove some of that restriction, less power is required so more of the power produced by burning fuel goes towards moving the vehicle. Therefore, more net power and less net fuel consumption under cruise conditions.

That makes sense!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
Aug 31, 2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.