Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 06:32 PM
  #1  
Z28/ZR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Thought I'd share my fabricated exhaust system.

All 2.5" mandrel bent stainless 304, including hangers and flanges.
Also incorporated a cross over in order to enhance the torque and achieve a mellow tone.

Mufflers are Magnaflow Polished Bullets.

Tips are 3" stainless.

Name:  2_zps89b2bcb1.jpg
Views: 190
Size:  61.3 KB

Name:  crossover_zps4a7423a5.jpg
Views: 233
Size:  62.0 KB

Name:  rearview_zps9a488aea.jpg
Views: 312
Size:  46.0 KB

Name:  overaxle_zps2d2b0125.jpg
Views: 446
Size:  56.2 KB

Name:  mufflers_zps26736273.jpg
Views: 175
Size:  62.8 KB

Name:  frontview_zpse8e191e7.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  55.4 KB

Name:  underrearview_zps0c652d3c.jpg
Views: 298
Size:  52.6 KB

Name:  rear_zps51023371.jpg
Views: 212
Size:  67.8 KB

Name:  side_zps3d6c068c.jpg
Views: 172
Size:  45.5 KB
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
IROCgiraffe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: SC
Car: '87 IROC-Z | '99 SS
Engine: LB9 | LS1
Transmission: 700R4 | T56
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Very cool!
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 07:17 PM
  #3  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Very very nice indeed
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 07:34 PM
  #4  
ghost91's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, New Jersey
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Very nice work from front to back!
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
Z28/ZR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Thanks guys.

It's still a 5.7 ltr. with lots of internal and external goodies.

Name:  engine3_zpsff86d083.jpg
Views: 240
Size:  85.9 KB
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 10:04 PM
  #6  
mjds's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Car: 86 sport coup
Engine: room for rent looking for ls power
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

very nice, looks like great ground clearance too!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 02:23 AM
  #7  
Dakota W.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

OMG, IT'S SO CLEAN UNDERNEATH! Needs LCAs though.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 08:08 AM
  #8  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

This IS nice work.
It's back to the shop for me. I assembled a y-pipe years back with stainless bends but didn't go so far as duals. Just a merge collector and an aftermarket cat-back setup.
What headers are you using?
Did you have to modify the cross member?
I don't suppose there might be a sound clip of the exhaust note?
Attached Thumbnails True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals-100_1843.jpg   True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals-100_1896.jpg  

Last edited by skinny z; Jul 10, 2013 at 08:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 08:13 AM
  #9  
redneckjoe's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 34
From: Spring Hill, Fl.
Car: 87 iroc-z
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

awesome work!!! great pics too!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 08:20 AM
  #10  
midias's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 238
From: Henrietta NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

That is beautiful. Nice job. Such a clean car.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #11  
Z28/ZR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Originally Posted by skinny z
This IS nice work.
It's back to the shop for me. I assembled a y-pipe years back with stainless bends but didn't go so far as duals. Just a merge collector and an aftermarket cat-back setup.
What headers are you using?
Did you have to modify the cross member?
I don't suppose there might be a sound clip of the exhaust note?
Headers are Hooker shorties. Yes, I did have to modify the tranny support. Welded a flat steel plate across the section where the material was removed.

Don't have a sound clip yet, as I have been working on her in stages. Engine, exhaust and now the interior. Being that quality and loudness of sound is a personal preference, I have to say that for me, the sound matches the car perfectly. I went with the LT4 hot cam, so the slight lope is distinctly noticeable, which is what I wanted.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:59 AM
  #12  
skinny z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 884
From: 53.0907° N, 113.4695° W
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

I think modifying the cross member is the only alternative if reasonable ground clearance is to be expected. (That's my cross member in the picture I posted) The automatic transmission doesn't make it any easier either. I know there are aftermarket alternatives too.
From a performance standpoint, unless you were to run a massive single bullet race muffler (spelled LOUD) duals are the way to go in order to achieve enough cfm.
Sound, or loudness, is a personal thing as you mentioned. I'm still looking for a combination of flow and something that doesn't wake the neighbors.
Again, excellent looking job. I wouldn't doubt that I'll follow it as a pattern for the next exhaust system that goes on my car.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 10:16 AM
  #13  
Z28/ZR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

My cross over served several purposes. 1. It balances the pulses for added torque. 2. It served to mellow the sound, as the same I.D pipe was used. 3. Also served as a structural re-enforcer for the Y pipe, which then connects to the dual pipes (minimizing any vibration)
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 10:24 AM
  #14  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

The exhaust looks great, but out of curiosity, why did you put the crossover where you did, instead of just incorporating an x a little farther back where the two pipes pair up? You would have been able to make a little more horsepower with the "x" instead of the "H" style pipe, plus it seems like it would have been a lot easier to incorporate it where the pipes are closer together.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 10:34 AM
  #15  
Z28/ZR1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Originally Posted by Jim85IROC
The exhaust looks great, but out of curiosity, why did you put the crossover where you did, instead of just incorporating an x a little farther back where the two pipes pair up? You would have been able to make a little more horsepower with the "x" instead of the "H" style pipe, plus it seems like it would have been a lot easier to incorporate it where the pipes are closer together.
Ideally, you want to put the crossover where the greatest amount of heat is generated. The reason I went with the "H" style verses the "X" had more to do with sound. I have tested both H and X styles and the gain differences haven't been that drastic, so, in this case sound tone was more important.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 09:24 PM
  #16  
roysatikas's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 3
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 4 bolt 350, .060 over
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: True 2.5" Mandrel Bent Duals

Nice job and thanks for sharing! Getting ready to instal the Dynomax kit #89009, true daul 2.25". I will try and get some photos etc and post them. Thanks for the motivation and nice work.
Roy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mattcanty
Firebirds for Sale
4
Oct 12, 2015 11:08 AM
paul_huryk
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
1
Oct 1, 2015 04:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.