belt routing for electric waterpump (solution)
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
belt routing for electric waterpump (solution)
well, ive wanted to run a electric waterpump for awhile, but i couldnt justify the cost.. esp when all of my waterpumps (including my extra backup ones) work perfectly...
i just came across one so im going to be putting it in.
now i know this belt routing will work, even without the idler pulley. ive run it from the PS pump to the crank before, and it doesnt slip at all.
my setup would be the last two.. from crank, past where the smog was, to the AC, then tensioner, then alt, then PS back to crank. by going around the waterpump area completely, i can stick a elec waterpump there.
i just came across one so im going to be putting it in.
now i know this belt routing will work, even without the idler pulley. ive run it from the PS pump to the crank before, and it doesnt slip at all.
my setup would be the last two.. from crank, past where the smog was, to the AC, then tensioner, then alt, then PS back to crank. by going around the waterpump area completely, i can stick a elec waterpump there.
DUDE 1,
When I first saw the topic line, I though this was another one of those "Radiator for Volkswagen Beetle" type threads. Then I remembered that some electric coolant pumps are simply an electric motor conversion. Then I realized that you might be talking about exactly what you are.
It seems you've already done your homework. I'd vote for the last example, but I'm not certain how/where you would mount that last idler, since the timing cover just isn't that substantial or robust. You'll also want to maintain a reaasonably large diameter on the idler, or you'll have ridiculously high RPMs on it and need a high-precision, partial compliment bearing for it.
When I first saw the topic line, I though this was another one of those "Radiator for Volkswagen Beetle" type threads. Then I remembered that some electric coolant pumps are simply an electric motor conversion. Then I realized that you might be talking about exactly what you are.
It seems you've already done your homework. I'd vote for the last example, but I'm not certain how/where you would mount that last idler, since the timing cover just isn't that substantial or robust. You'll also want to maintain a reaasonably large diameter on the idler, or you'll have ridiculously high RPMs on it and need a high-precision, partial compliment bearing for it.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Vader
DUDE 1,
When I first saw the topic line, I though this was another one of those "Radiator for Volkswagen Beetle" type threads. Then I remembered that some electric coolant pumps are simply an electric motor conversion. Then I realized that you might be talking about exactly what you are.
It seems you've already done your homework. I'd vote for the last example, but I'm not certain how/where you would mount that last idler, since the timing cover just isn't that substantial or robust. You'll also want to maintain a reaasonably large diameter on the idler, or you'll have ridiculously high RPMs on it and need a high-precision, partial compliment bearing for it.
DUDE 1,
When I first saw the topic line, I though this was another one of those "Radiator for Volkswagen Beetle" type threads. Then I remembered that some electric coolant pumps are simply an electric motor conversion. Then I realized that you might be talking about exactly what you are.
It seems you've already done your homework. I'd vote for the last example, but I'm not certain how/where you would mount that last idler, since the timing cover just isn't that substantial or robust. You'll also want to maintain a reaasonably large diameter on the idler, or you'll have ridiculously high RPMs on it and need a high-precision, partial compliment bearing for it.
however, i was thinking... why put the idler there? it would be packed and not wrap much more anyway.... so i came up with this idea:
now the idler isnt to scale, but basicly, its as large as it can get and as low as it can get without the belt hitting the pump or itself.
for mounting, it can use a very simple bracket thats bolted to where the smog pump was.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
You have deffinately done your HW and you are the first person I have seen to consider this. I have always wanted to do this myself but never got around to figuring it out. Anywhoo, I think you are going to need some sort of idler pully to get more pulley wrap. It seems if the last option you have drawn would be the best but I cannot see that running without any serious slip. Especially once the rpms go up and pump demands increase while cornering and such. What about going with a smog delete pulley and re routing the belt using that?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
It seems if the last option you have drawn would be the best but I cannot see that running without any serious slip. Especially once the rpms go up and pump demands increase while cornering and such.
It seems if the last option you have drawn would be the best but I cannot see that running without any serious slip. Especially once the rpms go up and pump demands increase while cornering and such.
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
What about going with a smog delete pulley and re routing the belt using that?
What about going with a smog delete pulley and re routing the belt using that?
ooooh, i did just get another idea based ont he last pic... i'll draw it up..
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
how about this?
it still has the large idler.
it could be made to retain the same belt im using now or even the stock one..
it has the same PS wrap as stock, more crank wrap, more AC wrap, and you dont have the long streach between the AC and crank that most !airpump belt routings have.
it still has the large idler.
it could be made to retain the same belt im using now or even the stock one..
it has the same PS wrap as stock, more crank wrap, more AC wrap, and you dont have the long streach between the AC and crank that most !airpump belt routings have.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
I goofed on which one I told you was best. Here is a pic I stole off your first post. I think this will be your best bet but isnce they is hardly anything loading the PS pump I think it will slip especially under hard cornering and high RPM's.
The super presice red arrow shows where i think slip will occour.
The super presice red arrow shows where i think slip will occour.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
I goofed on which one I told you was best. Here is a pic I stole off your first post. I think this will be your best bet but isnce they is hardly anything loading the PS pump I think it will slip especially under hard cornering and high RPM's.
The super presice red arrow shows where i think slip will occour.
I goofed on which one I told you was best. Here is a pic I stole off your first post. I think this will be your best bet but isnce they is hardly anything loading the PS pump I think it will slip especially under hard cornering and high RPM's.
The super presice red arrow shows where i think slip will occour.
ooh.... no worries there.
look at the first one at the top of the thread... thats the same wrap as the stock setup
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM








ignore this 
