1980 camaro
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL...for now
Car: 1987 F150...PAAARTY FOUL!
Engine: 300 I6 stump pullin sumbiscuit
Transmission: 4 speed grind box
Axle/Gears: 3.55 unlimited slip differential
first, a little education about Camaros in general...
1967-'69-1st Gen
1970-'81-2nd gen
1982-'92-3rd gen-thats us!!
find a second gen website, man!! most all of us here own and know most about 3rd gen Camaros and Firebirds. search the web and you will find out all you need to know. good luck with your search
Josh
1967-'69-1st Gen
1970-'81-2nd gen
1982-'92-3rd gen-thats us!!
find a second gen website, man!! most all of us here own and know most about 3rd gen Camaros and Firebirds. search the web and you will find out all you need to know. good luck with your search

Josh
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: 1980 camaro
Originally posted by Bennyb8323
I need to know everything about a 1980 Camaro
I need to know everything about a 1980 Camaro
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
OK here's what I remember from memory 
There were 4 different engine's availabe
cubic inch - horsepower rating
227 V-6 - 100
267 V-8 - 120
305 V-8 - 155
305 V-8 - 165
350 V-8 - 190
And there were 152005 camaros produced
Plus they were like really ugly and horsepower was .... well low (a V-8 with 120 horse ? and a 350 with 190??
)
Later, Garrett

There were 4 different engine's availabe
cubic inch - horsepower rating
227 V-6 - 100
267 V-8 - 120
305 V-8 - 155
305 V-8 - 165
350 V-8 - 190
And there were 152005 camaros produced
Plus they were like really ugly and horsepower was .... well low (a V-8 with 120 horse ? and a 350 with 190??
)Later, Garrett
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 3
From: La Crosse, WI USA
Car: 87 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I always thought 75-76 were the worst years for Camaro, no Z28, and whopping 165 horse 350
. I don't undstand why Carcraft voted for 1980.
. I don't undstand why Carcraft voted for 1980. Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
I agree with ya labrat that 75-76 were the worst but also all the ugly bumper cars (74-77) too with the exception of the '74Z28 with the big Z28 decal on the hood.I kinda like it.
Benny Try www.nastyz28.com for 2ndgens->1980
Benny Try www.nastyz28.com for 2ndgens->1980
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Prescott, AZ
Car: '86 Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 V8 (LB9)
Transmission: 700-R4
Originally posted by CamaroFreak406
Plus they were like really ugly
Plus they were like really ugly
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Waldoboro, ME
Car: '87 SC
Engine: 2.8L
Transmission: T5
I've always felt that the Camaros around 77 up to 82 looked badass... it's just too bad they were so weak, 175 hp from the 350? Although, I suppose, at the time maybe that wasn't so bad... I wouldn't know, I wasn't alive, heh
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
Originally posted by frmns87
I've always felt that the Camaros around 77 up to 82 looked badass... it's just too bad they were so weak, 175 hp from the 350? Although, I suppose, at the time maybe that wasn't so bad... I wouldn't know, I wasn't alive, heh
I've always felt that the Camaros around 77 up to 82 looked badass... it's just too bad they were so weak, 175 hp from the 350? Although, I suppose, at the time maybe that wasn't so bad... I wouldn't know, I wasn't alive, heh
I agree with going to Nasty's site, I used it when I considered a 2nd gen, 1980 350 4spd ..... fun to mod ... never a good keep it stock for orignal sakes !!!!
Besides at least the camaro kept a V8 till the bitter end, look what happened to other Muscles (Charger? duster? so on....)
Besides at least the camaro kept a V8 till the bitter end, look what happened to other Muscles (Charger? duster? so on....)
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Originally posted by labrat
I don't undstand why Carcraft voted for 1980.
I don't undstand why Carcraft voted for 1980.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM





