just got back from the track....
just got back from the track....
i still didnt break 13's
but i ran a 14.11 which is .01 faster than i ever ran before. i did bring up the mph from 93 to 98 which is a big jump. i also ran consistant 14.1's with consistant .550-.557 R/T. overall i am pleased however, the quest for 13's still continues.....
but i ran a 14.11 which is .01 faster than i ever ran before. i did bring up the mph from 93 to 98 which is a big jump. i also ran consistant 14.1's with consistant .550-.557 R/T. overall i am pleased however, the quest for 13's still continues..... Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 97 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 19WS6T/A91
1.92-1.97 is where most of my 60' times are. this is on dunlop sp 5000 radials!!
1.92-1.97 is where most of my 60' times are. this is on dunlop sp 5000 radials!!
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,271
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Don't forget, it's not just tires but track prep. A track that has no prep done to it will be slippery even when using slicks.
Buy some slicks and you should be in the 13's.
You're both running at different track elevations. Racing at a higher track will also slow a car down. Trust me. My racing at 5000 feet density altitude is very noticable when I go to a lower elevation track. My 1.5 60' time was at a lower track. Locally I usually only get 1.6's
Buy some slicks and you should be in the 13's.
You're both running at different track elevations. Racing at a higher track will also slow a car down. Trust me. My racing at 5000 feet density altitude is very noticable when I go to a lower elevation track. My 1.5 60' time was at a lower track. Locally I usually only get 1.6's
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fronzizzle
Suspension and Chassis
6
Mar 18, 2019 08:29 PM




