91 GTA vs. BMW 335i I was heading to Pittsburgh over the weekend, and a 335i came on ahead of me from an on ramp. I was cruising at about 70 and sped up a little, and he just kept out of reach of me when I would speed up. Then, he boots it and takes off, so I follow suit. We end up swapping positions a few times and running hard for a few miles, and I was able to keep with him door to door up to about 90-100, then he pulled on me hard everytime. I pretty much expected it though, considering it runs low 13's stock and is made to have top end, which my stock head and cammed L98 is not. After spring though, it will be a different story. ;) |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429027)
I was heading to Pittsburgh over the weekend, and a 335i came on ahead of me from an on ramp. I was cruising at about 70 and sped up a little, and he just kept out of reach of me when I would speed up. Then, he boots it and takes off, so I follow suit. We end up swapping positions a few times and running hard for a few miles, and I was able to keep with him door to door up to about 90-100, then he pulled on me hard everytime. I pretty much expected it though, considering it runs low 13's stock and is made to have top end, which my stock head and cammed L98 is not. After spring though, it will be a different story. ;) |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429047)
Gee that's funny with my wife driving our bmw and me in the old thirdgen. She was ahead from start to finish. I couldn't pull on it at all. My thirdgen was a bolt on car too. Healthy condition. Ran mid to low 14's with bolt ons. How is your car running low 13's with the stock heads? And I didn't say I pulled, I said door to door until 90-100, then he pulled away pretty fast. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429050)
I ran a 1.91 60' and 13.54 1/4 on worn out, cheap street tires and at a DA of 1729 ft., so it definitely has low 13's in it with tires and weather. I am FULL bolt on, nothing left I can do without doing internals parts, or putting boost to it. And I didn't say I pulled, I said door to door until 90-100, then he pulled away pretty fast. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i when i raced my Bmw with my old thirdgen. I got left from start to finish , by the time i hit third gear the beamer was a bus length away and was still pulling away. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429051)
Noooo, he should of left you by a bus length. They are twin turbos |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i 335i is about equal to the c5 LS1 vette.LOL |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429052)
when i raced my Bmw with my old thirdgen. I got left from start to finish , by the time i hit third gear the beamer was a bus length away and was still pulling away. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429054)
335i is about equal to the c5 LS1 vette.LOL |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429055)
I am one second quicker than you were, do the math man. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i What mods do u have? |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i 13s out of stock heads aren't that uncommon. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i something just doesn't sound right. You only ran a trap speed of 98 mph but you pulled a 13.5 sec time? |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by PhoenixFirebird
(Post 5429062)
13s out of stock heads aren't that uncommon. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429058)
Dragtimes says the 335i run low 13's stock, and I do too plus had a pass., which he did not. We raced at highway speeds and beyond, which is his territory, considering I have a stock cam and heads. The race went just like it should have and I knew it would. Want to see my timeslip, or ask member cashmunson, who was there and watching when I went through the beams? If I was gonna get on here and lie, I would have just said I won lol. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i 1 Attachment(s) Obviously you were born last night, because you have no clue wtf your talking about, and are making a fool of yourself right now. Read it and weep, and if the evidence isn't good enough, shoot a message to cashmunson and ask him, since him and his whole family were there when I ran it. And mind you, I ran this 13.5 on ONE SINGLE RUN, the only one I got of the night. I could have tweeked it a little and got a bag of ice for my superram, and ran a low 13. You mightt want to click the link in my siggy too, for my cardomain to see my mods. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429067)
No, you need aftermarket heads to break into the 13's consistently with these cars. I wasn't born last night. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by PhoenixFirebird
(Post 5429073)
Absolutely not, although port work does work wonders for these heads. I have to call BS on needing aftermarket heads to run 13s lol. Just a stock L98 geared correctly could probably hit consistent 13.9s. Add a decent stall, port work, and a cam, and you're in the 12s. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by PhoenixFirebird
(Post 5429073)
Absolutely not, although port work does work wonders for these heads. I have to call BS on needing aftermarket heads to run 13s lol. Just a stock L98 geared correctly could probably hit consistent 13.9s. Add a decent stall, port work, and a cam, and you're in the 12s. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i I've shown the evidence man, just accept it and stop arguing a losing battle. Soon cashmunson will pop on here, and tell you what he watched me do. Then more members like phoenix will pop up, and tell you your wrong too. The hole only gets deeper if you don't put down the shovel. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i You can hit the 12's with AFR heads, ZZ9 cam and Stealth ram intake. That combo will get you in the ballpark. Even ported stock heads can't touch a set of aftermarket heads. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429082)
I've shown the evidence man, just accept it and stop arguing a losing battle. Soon cashmunson will pop on here, and tell you what he watched me do. Then more members like phoenix will pop up, and tell you your wrong too. The hole only gets deeper if you don't put down the shovel. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429081)
Just so you know, my L98 was "geared correctly" with a 342 and it wasn't a 13.9 second car by any means |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429084)
I bet a Toyota Rav 4 v6 SUV would smoke you. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429085)
Then your mods were mismatched, you suck at driving, or it wasn't running right. Plain and simple. List your mods please. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429088)
Nope nothing was mismatched. Tune was probably the best i have seen too. That is just what these cars are capable of. They are not exactly light either. I have been tuning for a while now. There are plenty of satisfied members on this site for whom i have burned chips for. If anyone's combo is mismatched its yours. You are running a super ram intake which makes power in the upper rpms with a stock cam? and a 342 gear? and then you also claim to run a 13.5 at only 98 mph? |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429085)
Then your mods were mismatched, you suck at driving, or it wasn't running right. Plain and simple. List your mods please. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429090)
Argue all you want man, I posted my timeslip, video, and have witnesses, yet you continue to plead your case. I sure as hell wouldn't have crap tuned by you, because you don't even know what the car your tuning is capable of, obviously. I am just stunned by this ignorant conversation lol, its like being shown a video shot 3 ft. from your face of you killing someone and then saying you didn't do it. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i Those mods i listed are the only "worth while " mods for a thirdgen that is running stock heads,cam , and intake. That is that. I have been around these cars a loooong time. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429091)
mine was as follows: stock heads,cam, and intake. Edelbrock Tes headers, N10 dual cat ypipe, catback exhaust, CAI, underdrive crank pulley, Ford SVO 24 lb/hr inj,holley dial adustable fuel press reg, ported plenum, 1.6 comp cams roller tip rockers, shift kit, 342 gears, IAT relocation mod,custom chip with Moates G1 adapter , and all of the "free mods".:welcome: Sounds like your tune sucks, big surprise. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429094)
Oh now i don't know what it's capable of? I will give you a hint on tuning. ON a thirdgen, most of the "tuning" and power you can gain from a tune is in the fueling. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i Accel/Lingenfelter SuperRam intake 24 lb Bosch design III injectors Accel 58 MM throttle body Adjustable fuel pressure regulator PCMforLESS tuned chip 160 degree thermostat Hypertech 176 on/166 off fan switch Hedman headers Hedman Y pipe Flowmaster 80 series muffler Milodon high flow water pump March underdrive pulleys Goodyear hi miler hoses EGR deleted AIR pump deleted Cats deleted TB coolant bypass MSD streetfire ignition box NGK G power plugs Taylor 8MM wires Hypertech cap and rotor Hypertech 53K volt coil Poly. swaybar endlinks Poly. trans. mount KYB GR2 Struts Spohn tubular rear lower control arms Spohn tubular panhard bar '00 Camaro SS 3.42 posi rear diff Ram air II hood Ram Air intake box w/K&N air filter |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429098)
Ok, you had emissions equipment, which I do not. Stock TPI, which is junk and I do not have. IAT relocation = useless. Sounds like your tune sucks, big surprise. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i And BTW, I ran a 14.2@96 on nothing but the superram, 24 injectors, flowmaster muffler and tune. I was beating you before I even got started lol. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429103)
You have not the first clue how to tune do you? IAT relocation, also requires tuning to adjust and therefore benefit from it. That is the whole idea of getting your car tuned. There are lots of things that these mail order tuners don't do either. Everyone knows a mail order tune sucks. And yes, I obviously know more than you, since you can't get your car out of the 14's lol. You must be a horrible driver or a horrible tuner lol, maybe both. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i You shouldn't be running a 160 thermostat either. Your car would do much better with a 180 like mine. Fan on at 195. Why did you get rid of your emmisions? it does nothing for performance by getting rid of it either. 58 mm throttle body is not necessary either. It does nothing. The stock 48 mm is proven to be fine up to 350 hp. You would also be faster if you had your tuner change your torque converter lock up from 75 mph at WOT to 120 mph at WOT. There are lots of things these tuners don't know and can't do. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429106)
How does it suck, when I send them a 20 minute log file to tune off of? They aren't tuning blind, they are doing the same thing you or I would do. And yes, I obviously know more than you, since you can't get your car out of the 14's lol. You must be a horrible driver or a horrible tuner lol, maybe both. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i Tune doesn't really add any hp to any car |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i that is a guesstimate. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429104)
And BTW, I ran a 14.2@96 on nothing but the superram, 24 injectors, flowmaster muffler and tune. I was beating you before I even got started lol. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i Ha a 2012 Rav 4 SUV runs a 14.2 also! |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429115)
See , that sounds more realistic. A 14.2 with a super ram and all of your bolt ons. That is about right. I'll disregard your comment at the end. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429108)
You shouldn't be running a 160 thermostat either. Your car would do much better with a 180 like mine. Fan on at 195. Why did you get rid of your emmisions? it does nothing for performance by getting rid of it either. 58 mm throttle body is not necessary either. It does nothing. The stock 48 mm is proven to be fine up to 350 hp. You would also be faster if you had your tuner change your torque converter lock up from 75 mph at WOT to 120 mph at WOT. There are lots of things these tuners don't know and can't do. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429121)
Jesus christ, are you stupid. No, 14.2 with JUST A SUPERRAM, INJECTORS, AND TUNE, and it was 80+ degrees out. After the rest of what I did, 13.5. I can't believe your sitting here arguing with me and calling me a liar, when I have proof and witnesses. You would be a horrible juror, lol. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429125)
your calling me stupid and your spending time and money trying get an old 80's car into the 13's? |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429122)
And I'm gonna take your advice, when I am a second quicker than you? :lmao: |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by budfreak1
(Post 5429128)
Yep, I am. And not trying like you, doing it. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429111)
Tune doesn't really add any hp to any car |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by CashMunson
(Post 5429132)
A tune doesn't add any hp? that's the one of the stupidest comments i've ever read on this board. A tune adds hp all day long regardless of car make model etc etc. Budfreak's car has stock heads/cam along with working AC. I watched him run that pass at thompson. |
Re: 91 GTA vs. BMW 335i
Originally Posted by ninetyone
(Post 5429125)
your calling me stupid and your spending time and money trying get an old 80's car into the 13's? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands