Intrax or sportlines...which is lower
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga,ontario Canda
Car: 85 iroc-z
Engine: 350-headers,cam,3"catback
Intrax or sportlines...which is lower
hey wanted to lower my car and just wanted to kno which set of springs will lower my car more the sportlines or the intrax
if u got pic of ur car wit either spring plz post
thx
if u got pic of ur car wit either spring plz post
thx
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,770
Likes: 565
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Hg
Intrax is lower. All the intrax pics I've seen look VERY low.
Intrax is lower. All the intrax pics I've seen look VERY low.
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 22
From: Monroe,NC
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
I've seen cars with Sportlines that were lower than Intrax and I've seen cars with Intrax that were lower than Sportlines. I guess it all depends on the car. I have Sportlines and chose them over the Intrax due to several bad comments about them from users.
I have the intrax springs in the front, i having got around to installing the rear ones. I have no problems with them yet. They are pretty low though. My car is about 1/2 an inch lower than before.(Had 200,000 mile V-6 springs holding up a 350 so it was low.)I have stock size wheels and tires for a 91 RS and the front fender is just low enough that you can't see the top of the front tires. The car handles a lot better and seems to be a lot stiffer. I have very little body roll and I only have the little V-6 sway bars.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga,ontario Canda
Car: 85 iroc-z
Engine: 350-headers,cam,3"catback
ya iunno i have a iroc wit a 350 up front and i think my spring are worn cause it sit pretty low but i want it low enough to have almost no fender gap...does anyone now how high stock 85 iroc's are from the center of the fender to the floor?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
Well The sportlines are 1.75" right? and the Intrax are 2" drop so right out of the box the intrax are already lower then the eibachs. But the thing about intrax springs are that they like to sag...ALOT. Especially if you ever do competitive driving. I had them in my car and it gave me a 2" drop. I went to SCCA about every month for maybe about 4 or so months. After that my car was dropped about 3" if not more O_o if your thinking it could be my struts/shocks I changed them over to new stock replacements and it was the same. Those things really like to drop your car. So if you want looks intrax are okay but personally I think their crap.
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 22
From: Monroe,NC
Car: 90 Formula
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.27
The Sportlines front springs drop is 1.85-2.0" while the rears drop is 1.5" which is supposed to make the car sit level (Formulas and GTAs/TAs in particular) or give a slight rake.
here's a pic of mine with intrax, I don't suggest them I've had them for lil over a year now and they are beginning to sag, and the ride is gettin rougher and rougher, IMO the 2 inch drop was perfect but after about a year the sag is makin me think I wanna get some eibach's
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrPackstin
Interior Parts for Sale
11
Oct 25, 2017 08:09 PM








