Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Rack and Pinion... worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #1  
chomp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 V8
Rack and Pinion... worth it?

I'm going to be getting a tub. k member and a-arms and I was considering getting the rack and pinion setup (pa racing). It's about $500.

Basically, is it worth the money?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #2  
nape's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: SW Chicago 'burbs
Car: American Iron Firebird
Engine: The little 305 that could.
Transmission: Richmond T-10
Axle/Gears: Floater 9" - 3.64 gears
Not sure if anyone has measured the weigh difference, but I'd guess it to be ~50lbs if you're going manual rack.

How appealing does it sound to spend $10/lb?

I'd go find an S10 manual box in the junkyard and ditch ~20lbs that way.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #3  
phoenix305's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Clearfield,Utah
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
How much harder is the steering with a manual steering box. Would it be practical for everyday use?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #4  
soulbounder's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 20
From: Tomball, TX
Car: 89 TTA
Engine: Turbo 3.8
Transmission: 200R4
The manual box wouldn't be that bad once you got the car rolling.

Are you just using this car for drag racing, autocross, or daily driving?

For autocross and daily driving I don't think it is worth it. The stock setup provides more than enough road feel, at least for me.

For drag racing, it would probably be benefical to go with the rack and pinion for the weight savings.

If your application is a street/strip car then do what you want. IMHO, building a street/strip car is one of the worst ideas ever known to the automotive world. That's just half-a$$ing two separate projects.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Judge on your own. In general, a rack is lighter while a steering gear/box gives better feedback/feels better. WRT to geometry, the stock geometry is incredibly good for an OEM setup and I’d be very surprised if any of the aftermarket setups have as little bump steer…
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
BMH95's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Car: 92 Camaro
I just put an S10 manual box in mine. I haven't driven it yet, but it turns very easily when moving it around the garage and driveway. The big difference is the wieght, and the number of turns. It is like 4.5 turns side to side, whereas the stock power steering box is 2.5. Good for drag racing, and light street duty. Not an option for road racing. You won't save that much weight between a manual box and a rack and pinion. The rack and pinion benefit is the number of turns side to side, but it won't be as easy to turn as the s10 box.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #7  
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, FL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73
also with big sticky tires a manual box would suck....
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #8  
contact's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Engine: sbc 350
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Judge on your own. In general, a rack is lighter while a steering gear/box gives better feedback/feels better. WRT to geometry, the stock geometry is incredibly good for an OEM setup and I’d be very surprised if any of the aftermarket setups have as little bump steer…
My understanding is, R+P is claimed to have better feedback
and feel, than a steering box. Is that not correct?
Is there a reason to add R+P, just for steering feel?
Has there ever been a comparson between RnP and
steering box, in similiar sporty cars, both in good shape?

OTOH, the claim that RnP is better, could be....
management wants to install RnP {for whatever reason},
so marketing says RnP is better.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #9  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by contact
My understanding is, R+P is claimed to have better feedback
and feel, than a steering box. Is that not correct?


No

Is there a reason to add R+P, just for steering feel?
Has there ever been a comparson between RnP and
steering box, in similiar sporty cars, both in good shape?

OTOH, the claim that RnP is better, could be....
management wants to install RnP {for whatever reason},
so marketing says RnP is better.
There’s a reason why most sports cars didn’t go to R&P until well after the rest of the car line did, and when they finally did it was when design constraints just didn’t leave enough room to run a real steering gear (look at vettes and f-bodies).

The reason that trucks still use them is that they are generally more durable then R&P.

R&P was sold to the public in advertising as an improvement, but really it was just smaller and cheaper then a real steering box
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2005 | 10:10 AM
  #10  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by contact
My understanding is, R+P is claimed to have better feedback
and feel, than a steering box. Is that not correct?


No

Is there a reason to add R+P, just for steering feel?
Has there ever been a comparson between RnP and
steering box, in similiar sporty cars, both in good shape?

OTOH, the claim that RnP is better, could be....
management wants to install RnP {for whatever reason},
so marketing says RnP is better.
There’s a reason why most sports cars didn’t go to R&P until well after the rest of the car line did, and when they finally did it was when design constraints just didn’t leave enough room to run a real steering gear (look at vettes and f-bodies).

Usually econo boxes got R&P first, then anything that they needed to cut costs in/fix packaging problems and finally sports cars, luxury cars and if forced to, trucks…

The reason that trucks still use real steering gears is that they are generally more durable then R&P.

R&P was sold to the public in advertising as an improvement, but really it was just smaller and cheaper then a real steering box
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
Oct 12, 2015 07:28 AM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Oct 3, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.