Do I need LCA brackets?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Katherine, Australia
Car: 1990 Camaro IROC-T
Engine: L98 Turbo (GT40)
Transmission: THO400
Axle/Gears: Forged axles, 3.23 rear
Do I need LCA brackets?
I know the general answer is a resounding YES! But I'm not sure.
See, at the moment my car has been RAISED in the rear (due to much taller tyres than stock) and dropped in the front 1.5".
Now this in itself gave me huge traction gains after lowering the front. So my question is does my new geometry mean that LCA lowering brackets would actually be TOO low and cause more problems than they'd solve?
Thoughts?
See, at the moment my car has been RAISED in the rear (due to much taller tyres than stock) and dropped in the front 1.5".
Now this in itself gave me huge traction gains after lowering the front. So my question is does my new geometry mean that LCA lowering brackets would actually be TOO low and cause more problems than they'd solve?
Thoughts?
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
If your LCA are uphill going towards the rear of the car, then you need relo brackets for certain. But you don't have that. Using relo brackets can get additional bite so they're not a poor idea. I wouldn't bother, based on the first sentence, but would consider reinforced LCA a step to take before adding relo brackets.
Just remember to install the holes (usually 2 sets of holes in addition to stock) in an arc so that relocating the arm to a lower position does not change rear axle position. Installing them straight up and down is for lemmings.
Just remember to install the holes (usually 2 sets of holes in addition to stock) in an arc so that relocating the arm to a lower position does not change rear axle position. Installing them straight up and down is for lemmings.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









