adjustable suspension strenght?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 2putt8
Axle/Gears: 3.42
adjustable suspension strenght?
Maybe its just me, but it seems like the LCA's, torque arm's and panhard bars that are adjustabe would be weaker than the non-adjustable ones. is there any truth to this, or am i just parnoid? i ask cus i am starting to get all my suspension stuff together for this winters build. also, what does everyone think of BMR
The threads on a bolt are so close to being as strong as a solid piece it does not make a difference. If something were to break an adjustable piece it would break a solid piece too.
As for brands, it does not matter. Everyone builds pieces virtually the same. Go with what brand you like.
As for brands, it does not matter. Everyone builds pieces virtually the same. Go with what brand you like.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
The threads on a bolt are so close to being as strong as a solid piece it does not make a difference. If something were to break an adjustable piece it would break a solid piece too.
If adjustable lca's are weaker then how do you explain a drag-race 4-link on a 3000+hp Pro Mod?
You have to remember that the rod-ends are fine threaded, and that you would have to shear every thread off from inside the tube/nut to break one. 3/4 or 1" rod ends....nothing any of us have is that bad.
You have to remember that the rod-ends are fine threaded, and that you would have to shear every thread off from inside the tube/nut to break one. 3/4 or 1" rod ends....nothing any of us have is that bad.
Originally Posted by BMmonteSS
In the real world it doesn't matter because the pieces are (should) be overdesigned.
And I still stand by what I said. I think threaded is just as, or so close to being as strong as solid pieces. If you have enough power to strip threads clear out of an adj. torque arm, you have enough power to bend that torque arm, and bend a solid piece at that.
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 350, 4bbl
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GM, 3.23 posi
The adjustable stuff is not necessarily weaker (I'm sure there are companies that put out junk, adjustable or not), it just wears out faster due to the heim joints. If there are no heim joints, then the adjustable stuff should be very comparable to the non-adjustable stuuf (heck, most of the adjustable stuff is used by people who race). Side note: Heim joints make for a much rougher and louder ride. They are used for racing so that handling characteristics can be changed easily. They are also used on lowered cars to bring the suspension geometry/driveline angles back into 'alignment' (for lack of a better word).
If your car is stock height (or close) and you don't do any racing, either will be fine. You will just have to adjust the adjustable parts to get the suspension 'aligned' (there's that word again) where it needs to be.
If you daily drive the car and/or don't race, I would stick with the non-adjustable stuff. Then you won't have to worry about adjusting anything.
As for the discussion about the threads being weaker than a solid part, it's not the stripping (i.e. pulling the threads out) that you have to worry about, its having the shaft break in shear at the base of the threaded portion. In the case of the parts we are talking about, they are so overdesigned that it is not an issue unless you are making un-goddly amounts of power and/or are beating the snot out of the car on a race track.
FWIW: UMI makes some really nice stuff, and BMR has a bad reputation with hardcore road racers. I have never had BMR stuff, but I do have UMI parts and I'm really impressed with their quality. Spohn also makes good stuff from what I have read on some of the racing boards (I have no experience with spohn so I can't say from experience, just like I can't speak from experience with BMR, just passing along what I have heard).
If your car is stock height (or close) and you don't do any racing, either will be fine. You will just have to adjust the adjustable parts to get the suspension 'aligned' (there's that word again) where it needs to be.
If you daily drive the car and/or don't race, I would stick with the non-adjustable stuff. Then you won't have to worry about adjusting anything.
As for the discussion about the threads being weaker than a solid part, it's not the stripping (i.e. pulling the threads out) that you have to worry about, its having the shaft break in shear at the base of the threaded portion. In the case of the parts we are talking about, they are so overdesigned that it is not an issue unless you are making un-goddly amounts of power and/or are beating the snot out of the car on a race track.
FWIW: UMI makes some really nice stuff, and BMR has a bad reputation with hardcore road racers. I have never had BMR stuff, but I do have UMI parts and I'm really impressed with their quality. Spohn also makes good stuff from what I have read on some of the racing boards (I have no experience with spohn so I can't say from experience, just like I can't speak from experience with BMR, just passing along what I have heard).
Last edited by sjc115; Aug 1, 2006 at 12:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LiquidBlue
Wheels and Tires
32
Dec 10, 2019 04:06 PM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:35 PM





