Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2012 | 03:34 PM
  #1  
mstacy1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

I've searched this and other forums for real world experience with the 5610 coils. I see them used on 2nd Gens as well as GBody cars but no feedback as to how they performed. I've seen the MOOG charts for spring rates, etc. for the 5610. 5660, 5662, 5664. I'm wanting a nice handling street car that won't beat the screws out of the dash on rough roads. I have a 92 RS convertible 305TPI 5/spd w/AC and GR-2 struts/shocks. The 424-lb rate on the 5610 should not be too harsh and I figure I can offset body roll with a 36/21 sway bar combo. What concerns me is that they have a 4+ inch difference between free and loaded height vs @2.5 inch for the 5660, 5662, 5664. Coupled with a 1700lb+ loaded pressure, I'm wondering if that will cause the front to "push up" on the rebound and result in a loose feel. Anyone acually used them? Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 01:13 PM
  #2  
kevinc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 3
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

I have a pair of Moog 5608 I never installed (got a pair of WS6 fronts cheap) if you're interested. $20 plus shipping if you want 'em, PM me.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 07:57 AM
  #3  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: state of confusion
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

The 5606/5608/5610 rates are only about where the OE F41 rate for the '79 Malibu was.

I eventually upgraded to 5660's with the car still being entirely daily-driveable. If 600-ish sounds too firm for you, the 5658's are something like 70 lb/in softer which still puts them 100 lb/in or so stiffer.

Ride comfort is going to be more tied to your shock choice than to the difference between 5610's and either of the stiffer springs. Bilsteins would be a good choice. Tokicos probably not.


Norm
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2012 | 10:36 PM
  #4  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

Originally Posted by mstacy1
I've searched this and other forums for real world experience with the 5610 coils. I see them used on 2nd Gens as well as GBody cars but no feedback as to how they performed.
Going to a low 400lb-in rate spring is less than a stock F41 F-body had, so skip the 5610 entirely.

I've seen the MOOG charts for spring rates, etc. for the 5610. 5660, 5662, 5664. I'm wanting a nice handling street car that won't beat the screws out of the dash on rough roads.
Budget for high end shocks and struts like adjustable Koni's. Springs can be obscenely high-rate and not kill ride.

I have a 92 RS convertible 305TPI 5/spd w/AC and GR-2 struts/shocks. The 424-lb rate on the 5610 should not be too harsh and I figure I can offset body roll with a 36/21 sway bar combo.
You can't, really. An over-swaybarred car can be grossly mis-balanced with regard to at-limit snap over-steer.

KYB has some good product and they have some bad product depending on the car. They have some non-f-body shocks that are absolutely horrendous for ride, but they have some products for other platforms that are great.

What concerns me is that they have a 4+ inch difference between free and loaded height vs @2.5 inch for the 5660, 5662, 5664. Coupled with a 1700lb+ loaded pressure, I'm wondering if that will cause the front to "push up" on the rebound and result in a loose feel.
A rebound rise like that is a shock with too little rebound control. That will show up a lot when going to a stiffer spring, or using a shock intended for a softer spring.

There's nothing wrong with the 600lb-in front stock springs in the F-chassis for someone who wants ride over handling. Better ride is going to come from shocks. Stock type rear springs (and not Moog CC635 f-body cargo coils) will give a good ride but if there are 3 or 4 part numbers, you may want to choose the middle range to accomodate the added weight of a `vert.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #5  
mstacy1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Re: Moog 5610......Anyone Using Them?

Thanks for the replies and info guys. I used the 5610's because they were in my hand and more than what the v6 springs were by a good bit (ex. V6 car). I'm going to replace the 30/18 bars with the F41 bars (34/21) and see how it works. Not a big deal or expense to swap the springs if I'm not happy. jmd.......thanks, I'll keep my 18mm rear bar in case the 21mm proves to be a little much.


BTW....maybe I'm getting old but this 305 runs a LOT stronger than I expected. Especially for a Hawks junkyard motor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
Aug 15, 2021 10:16 PM
87v6Bird
Suspension and Chassis
15
Jul 1, 2018 04:12 PM
starfinder
Suspension and Chassis
27
Oct 25, 2015 10:40 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
TA8487
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 11, 2015 09:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.