Taking your tbi to the next level, part two
if this is of any help?
i wanna say 7/2003 i swapped in my 7747 as my mods disallowed use of stock tune. i worked on getting the car drivable. it was a sad tune situation. choke function-idle speed-data logged when in closed loop, tip in, accelleration enrichment, etc. after about 60 days of logging(with Doms help TY) and burning(with Doms help TY) mutiple chips(20?) i took car to dyno. they logged HP/TQ and most importantly WOT A/F as i did not own WB. it so happens my PE was commanded to 12/1 and the WB showed 11.9 and 12.1 on two runs. that was 10/2003. very warm day and high humidity. some of that was luck. FP at 13 lbs BUT had 80 lbs injs. so lack of FP offset buy large injs? had i not optimized my underlying CL tune i would not have been able to hit the commanded PE. so if you have the bases covered and have a grasp as to fueling needs(FP/inj size)i will presume the PE may fall in line.
today(car stored nov) my tune is off on PE. 13.3/1 on WB. running 17.5 lbs FP. but general drivability is pretty good. and car moves out OK. underlying tune optimized yet PE off? so that just goes to show i can fuel Ok at lower rpms but not 6000. prior mods car spun 5000(phase 1). i need to up FP to 20 and start over. need to work on that PE in spring!
i wanna say 7/2003 i swapped in my 7747 as my mods disallowed use of stock tune. i worked on getting the car drivable. it was a sad tune situation. choke function-idle speed-data logged when in closed loop, tip in, accelleration enrichment, etc. after about 60 days of logging(with Doms help TY) and burning(with Doms help TY) mutiple chips(20?) i took car to dyno. they logged HP/TQ and most importantly WOT A/F as i did not own WB. it so happens my PE was commanded to 12/1 and the WB showed 11.9 and 12.1 on two runs. that was 10/2003. very warm day and high humidity. some of that was luck. FP at 13 lbs BUT had 80 lbs injs. so lack of FP offset buy large injs? had i not optimized my underlying CL tune i would not have been able to hit the commanded PE. so if you have the bases covered and have a grasp as to fueling needs(FP/inj size)i will presume the PE may fall in line.
today(car stored nov) my tune is off on PE. 13.3/1 on WB. running 17.5 lbs FP. but general drivability is pretty good. and car moves out OK. underlying tune optimized yet PE off? so that just goes to show i can fuel Ok at lower rpms but not 6000. prior mods car spun 5000(phase 1). i need to up FP to 20 and start over. need to work on that PE in spring!
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Ron,
Great point. I had a great tune using 10.5fp. But we put Grumpy's WB on the car at a PowWow and it showed over 14AFR starting at 4000rpm. Now the FP is at 20psi. Re-tuned the entire VE table and couldn't have done the WOT tuning without the WB and RBob's extended VE tables.
Great point. I had a great tune using 10.5fp. But we put Grumpy's WB on the car at a PowWow and it showed over 14AFR starting at 4000rpm. Now the FP is at 20psi. Re-tuned the entire VE table and couldn't have done the WOT tuning without the WB and RBob's extended VE tables.
it is difficult to tune WOT on xway. telephone poles look like a picket fence. for some of us anyway !!
cars get in way and all that. maybe the dyno or dragstrip is the safest route.
cars get in way and all that. maybe the dyno or dragstrip is the safest route.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Originally posted by Ronny
it is difficult to tune WOT on xway. telephone poles look like a picket fence. for some of us anyway !!
cars get in way and all that. maybe the dyno or dragstrip is the safest route.
it is difficult to tune WOT on xway. telephone poles look like a picket fence. for some of us anyway !!
cars get in way and all that. maybe the dyno or dragstrip is the safest route.
Ron,
I picked out a couple of straightaways, particularly following an on-ramp. Several have fairly long merge lanes. Make sure I'd be there in third gear at about 2000rpm and a steady TPS, then slammed it to redline.
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I knew I could get a close tune without a WB but I was talking a near perfect tune. I didn't know if a NB was just a slower WB or if it was something different I really don't know the difference between the two, can someone supply a good link that will get me up to speed on that? Right now I'm going to stick with a NB because WB's are expensive and I have a lot of other things I need to attend, besides I go WOT maybe 3 times a month so as long as everything else is good I'll be fine for a while, this is a daily driver WAGON not a sports car. WOT is not that important, unless of course I'm missing the importance of WOT tuning?
If I seem at all annoying it may be the fact that I'm 19 and you've all got years of experience on me and I'm trying to catch up so I can hold up on my own without looking stupid. Hopefully thats not that case, I don't want to offend/bother anyone here.
Thanks for clearing things up Dominic
If I seem at all annoying it may be the fact that I'm 19 and you've all got years of experience on me and I'm trying to catch up so I can hold up on my own without looking stupid. Hopefully thats not that case, I don't want to offend/bother anyone here.
Thanks for clearing things up Dominic
NB is engineered to provide A/F info(voltage) to ECU only at stoich or 14.7/1 for emishions and to work in harmony with cat convert. cat convert cannot tolerate anything but 14.7 on a regular basis.
WB is engineered to proovide to ECU or another onboard computer approx 8/1 and as far as 40/1 as far as i know.
someone will surely correct me
WB is engineered to proovide to ECU or another onboard computer approx 8/1 and as far as 40/1 as far as i know.
someone will surely correct me
Quote: WB's are expensive
why not build your own? search. the 02 sensor is about $50(bosch VW) and i bet there are cheaper from other manufacturers.
i dont have a clue as to how but i know of people your age that possibly do or have resources available to them.
why not build your own? search. the 02 sensor is about $50(bosch VW) and i bet there are cheaper from other manufacturers.
i dont have a clue as to how but i know of people your age that possibly do or have resources available to them.
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 78 Caprice Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Ronny
NB is engineered to provide A/F info(voltage) to ECU only at stoich or 14.7/1 for emishions and to work in harmony with cat convert. cat convert cannot tolerate anything but 14.7 on a regular basis.
NB is engineered to provide A/F info(voltage) to ECU only at stoich or 14.7/1 for emishions and to work in harmony with cat convert. cat convert cannot tolerate anything but 14.7 on a regular basis.
I'm ditching mine as soon as the headers come in. What all is the O2 sensor there for besides helping the cats, I know the engine runs like crap with a bad one but thats all I know about it
Do I need it? Can I hook up a WB in its place? I've got to get a new O2 sensor when the headers come in, getting a heated one as recommended by Brian at TBIchips.com Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
The O2 sensor is how you computer compensates for fueling. You do need it. A WBO2 is not swapable into the stock place, unless you made MAJOR code changes. The WB that we all use to tune, is suplementry, we use it while tuning and that is it. then when in closed-loop operation, the factory O2 operates as normal, to keep us at the proper AFR.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Car: 1989 Iroc Z
Engine: 496 BBC
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 4.11
can you guys give the direct links to the 3 programmers because the sites are too damn confusing
http://secure.transtronics.com/EPROM%20Programmer.html
http://secure.transtronics.com/EPROM%20Programmer.html
Last edited by M1tch; May 29, 2006 at 12:27 AM.
Re: Taking your tbi to the next level, part two
Dominic- i'm glad I was able to locate you. I remember you from the old Crossfire web site. I need some help on the heads on my 84 vette on which I'm installing an X-Ram. My mechanic wants to port match the heads and he said there a large dimple in the intake runners he wants to remove but we're not sure how much material is there so we're afraid to grind down the obstruction. I'm going to email you with an illustration. If you could cantact me @ robert.krafft@honeywell.com I would greatly appreciate it. I know you have lots of experience with these engines. Haven't the X-Rams been installed on stock heads with good results? Thanks Bob krafft
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Re: Taking your tbi to the next level, part two
Dominic- i'm glad I was able to locate you. I remember you from the old Crossfire web site. I need some help on the heads on my 84 vette on which I'm installing an X-Ram. My mechanic wants to port match the heads and he said there a large dimple in the intake runners he wants to remove but we're not sure how much material is there so we're afraid to grind down the obstruction. I'm going to email you with an illustration. If you could cantact me @ robert.krafft@honeywell.com I would greatly appreciate it. I know you have lots of experience with these engines. Haven't the X-Rams been installed on stock heads with good results? Thanks Bob krafft
I never did anything with the stock heads. Not worth bothering with IMO. I did port match the Xfire manifold to the original heads and then to the
TFS 23D heads I had. I don't think there's much diff between a ported Xfire and an Xram.
Re: Taking your tbi to the next level, part two
Exactly. Not worth the expense. Especially considering there are Vortec heads available from $500+ a pair. Granted you will need to be creative on intake choice. How about a Vortec 2 barrel intake with a GM 7.4L TBI on top!
Re: Taking your tbi to the next level, part two
[quote=Dewey316;1973987]your covering most of it.
Important points, again. WBO2, it will make things SO much easier.
I plan on getting started tuning in the near future. Which WB02 is recommended? Which sensor do I need for my '89 camaro? There are so many options that its driving me nuts.
Important points, again. WBO2, it will make things SO much easier.
I plan on getting started tuning in the near future. Which WB02 is recommended? Which sensor do I need for my '89 camaro? There are so many options that its driving me nuts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
121, 350, 88, air, at29c256, chip, fuel, hesitation, injection, operating, parameters, pe, ratio, tbi, temperature





