Rocker Arm Identification
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Clarksburg,MA.
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 357 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Rocker Arm Identification
Along with the question of identification can anyone shed any light on the realiability of aluminum rockers. I'am building a 350 with about 300 to 330 horses. I want a realiable engine that will only see track time ocasionally.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I agree with ede, I will not put aluminum moving parts of any kind in anything that I want to run for any length of time. It fatigues and breaks in half suddenly without warning. That's why so many aircraft things are legally required to be replaced at specified intervals, not merely inspected; you can't tell when it's about to break.
Steel rockers can be (and are) designed so that their moment of inertia, i.e. the rotating equivalent of linear momentum, is lower than is possible with aluminum.
Run steel on the street. Just not those ones in the pic. I can't think of any criterion by which an aluminum rocker is superior, except for their price.
Steel rockers can be (and are) designed so that their moment of inertia, i.e. the rotating equivalent of linear momentum, is lower than is possible with aluminum.
Run steel on the street. Just not those ones in the pic. I can't think of any criterion by which an aluminum rocker is superior, except for their price.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
Oct 9, 2015 09:39 AM





