stock lt1 compression? 1996
02-02-2004, 10:34 PM
#4
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Vader
Static compression ratio is 10.4:1.
Static compression ratio is 10.4:1.
02-03-2004, 05:57 AM
#5
The blueprinted static compression ratio should be 10.44:1. You can round that off any way you want, I suppose. It's not a lot different than the LS1 engines being called "5.7L", while the actual displacement is only 345.6 CI, or 5.66L, and a "350" is only 349.8 CI, or a "396" is actually 402 CI.....
The LT4 engines had a static CR of 10.8:1.
The LT4 engines had a static CR of 10.8:1.
02-03-2004, 07:23 AM
#6
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 392 Likes
on
299 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Vader
The blueprinted static compression ratio should be 10.44:1. You can round that off any way you want, I suppose. It's not a lot different than the LS1 engines being called "5.7L", while the actual displacement is only 345.6 CI, or 5.66L, and a "350" is only 349.8 CI, or a "396" is actually 402 CI.....
The LT4 engines had a static CR of 10.8:1.
The blueprinted static compression ratio should be 10.44:1. You can round that off any way you want, I suppose. It's not a lot different than the LS1 engines being called "5.7L", while the actual displacement is only 345.6 CI, or 5.66L, and a "350" is only 349.8 CI, or a "396" is actually 402 CI.....
The LT4 engines had a static CR of 10.8:1.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
08-10-2015 08:27 PM
