K&N's or Not???
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 2
From: Louisville, Ky
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
K&N's or Not???
ive read so much that showed k&n's rock and so much that said they dont flow any more than a paper filter when its new. well whats eveyones opnion. should i spend 60 bucks on k&n's or just keep my paper filters changed. this going on my 383 stealthram with the normal tpi intake system and a cold air mod. the more i think about it the more it doesnt seem worth it...
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Its a long term investment. Even if it doesn't make more power, in the long run you save money. The filter is reusable for ever so you don't have to pay for a replacement filter every year.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 2
From: Louisville, Ky
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
my first one had one on it...
and it wasent as performance oriented, i was 15
but i wont mind paying the extra money everytime to buy new paper filters if they flow just as good or better. since you have to recharge the k&n's anyway and that kit costs $$. but i guess its a sin not to have a k&n on here
just kiddin guys im probably going to order them anyway when i have to order my new valve springs but i wanted to get opinions!!
keep them coming
and it wasent as performance oriented, i was 15 but i wont mind paying the extra money everytime to buy new paper filters if they flow just as good or better. since you have to recharge the k&n's anyway and that kit costs $$. but i guess its a sin not to have a k&n on here
just kiddin guys im probably going to order them anyway when i have to order my new valve springs but i wanted to get opinions!! keep them coming
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
i think k&n also claims better filtering? While you do have to pay for the recharge kit i bet in the long run it comes out about equal in price so why not just get the k&n, plus they look cooler. But if you put the car on a dyno and made back to back runs one with a normal filter and one with a k&n i doubt there would be any difference worth noticing
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 2
From: Louisville, Ky
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
yea thats about what i thought but i do want the best filtering possible, cant mess up my new 383. besides, i dont have any K&N stickers yet :lala:
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
One of the best things about K&N or similar filters is that htey still flow as good as a new paper element when dirty. They don't lose flow as you use them like paper, and the filter better.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
K&N is better... they do flow better, and in the long run, they are cheaper than replacing your paper filter all the time. They also filter better than paper ones do.
The only expense after buying the filter is the cleaning/re-oiling kit, AKA "recharger kit". Its about $5-10, and will do the filter a few times, depending on the size of the filter.
K&N gets my vote.
The only expense after buying the filter is the cleaning/re-oiling kit, AKA "recharger kit". Its about $5-10, and will do the filter a few times, depending on the size of the filter.
K&N gets my vote.
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Goose Creek, SC
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC Z-28
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
I was out at the track, and wanted to test out the K&N's. I ran down the track with original paper filters, then with no filters. Got the same result with both. Then I put in the K&N's and it dropped a .1 off my 1/8th mile time. Just my experience




Why are you asking about them now???