Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

302 sbf in a 86 camaro no flames please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
bill88stang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
302 sbf in a 86 camaro no flames please

im just wondering if anyone has heard of this kind of swap. ive seen sbc in a mustang fox body but never heard of a sbf in a camaro. im just curious of what would need to be done to get one behind a 700r4 if its possible. please keep the flames to yourself wiht the ford ina ford and chevy in a chevy. i have both a 86 camaro and a 88 mustang gt . thanks for any info
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #2  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
it would probably be easier to get the trans behind the engine. But, it would definately be easier and cheaper to put a sbc instead of a ford.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #3  
bill88stang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Mrs

i realize that a 350 is easier but a 302 is different and i alwasy down for trying different things.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #4  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
You amy be able to fidn an adapter plate to put the 700 to the ford engine, I've never looked for such a thing before. I am guessing that you will need some custom mountwork of sorts. probably hjave to trial fit, mark, and drill new holes. I guess you could just weld them in. Beyond that, an engine is an engine. You will have to adapt everything that goes with it. Need the whole accesory setup from the ford would probably be easist.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #5  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,653
Likes: 309
You may be neglecting another option if you're really sold on a 302 - A SBC 302. It's been around since at least 1967, about as long as the 302 SBF. The dimensions are the same, with a 4" bore and 3" stroke.

One downside for either 302 is lack of low end torque, requiring a gear change to offset the loos. Since the 302 is more suited as an RPM engine, the taller rear end will suit the engine at higher road speeds as well.

Another failing is exactly what killed the SBF 302 in 1995. A 4x3 engine is not very fuel efficient, and not very emissions friendly.

While there are plenty of aftermarket go-fast parts for the SBF 302 (or 289-351), there are a lot more for the SBC. That usually makes the selection broader and costs lower.

The one advantage teh stock SBF had over the stocl SBC is the head/valve/port arrangement. The later stock and aftermarket SBC heads seemed to address that issue and eliminate and advantage that the SBF might have had.

Still, if you want something different, I suppose it could be done, provided you have access to whatever you might need to fabricate custom parts.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 12:02 AM
  #6  
DENN_SHAH's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 1
From: houston
Car: 83 POS monte carlo 2015 chevy P/U
Engine: 92 5.7 tpi 5.3
Transmission: 700r4 6L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.42 too high
if your really thinking about doing this,

http://www.transmissioncenter.net/highperf700r4.htm

about 3/4 way down the page you'll find an adapter to mate a SBF to a 700r4.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
BADNBLK
Auto Detailing and Appearance
15
Nov 16, 2016 09:12 AM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
Sep 4, 2015 03:42 AM
Golfvette
Interior
11
Aug 24, 2015 06:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.